OBJECTIVE: To pursue the previously long-standing but formally untested clinical view that melancholia is preferentially responsive to antidepressant medication in comparison with psychotherapy [specifically Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)]. Second, to determine whether a broader action antidepressant medication sequencing regimen is superior to a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) alone. METHOD: We sought to recruit a large sample of participants with melancholic depression for a 12-week trial but inclusion criteria compromised recruitment and testing the second hypothesis. The first hypothesis was evaluated by comparing 18 participants receiving antidepressant medication to 11 receiving CBT. Primary study measures were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Hamilton Endogenous Subscale (HES), rated blindly, while several secondary measures also evaluated outcome. RESULTS: Participants receiving medication had a superior 12-week outcome to those receiving CBT, with significant differences present on primary measures as early as 4 weeks. At trial conclusion, the percentage improvement in HAM-D scores was 61.1% vs. 34.4%, respectively [Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 3.7] and with those in receipt of medication returning non-significantly higher HAM-D responder (66.6% vs. 36.4%, NNT = 2.8) and remission (66.7% vs. 45.4%, NNT = 4.7) rates. CONCLUSION: As the sample size was small and participants evidenced only moderate levels of depression severity, the study risked being underpowered and idiosyncratic. Despite the small sample, the superiority of antidepressant medication to CBT in those with a melancholic depression was distinctive in this pilot study.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To pursue the previously long-standing but formally untested clinical view that melancholia is preferentially responsive to antidepressant medication in comparison with psychotherapy [specifically Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)]. Second, to determine whether a broader action antidepressant medication sequencing regimen is superior to a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) alone. METHOD: We sought to recruit a large sample of participants with melancholic depression for a 12-week trial but inclusion criteria compromised recruitment and testing the second hypothesis. The first hypothesis was evaluated by comparing 18 participants receiving antidepressant medication to 11 receiving CBT. Primary study measures were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Hamilton Endogenous Subscale (HES), rated blindly, while several secondary measures also evaluated outcome. RESULTS:Participants receiving medication had a superior 12-week outcome to those receiving CBT, with significant differences present on primary measures as early as 4 weeks. At trial conclusion, the percentage improvement in HAM-D scores was 61.1% vs. 34.4%, respectively [Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 3.7] and with those in receipt of medication returning non-significantly higher HAM-D responder (66.6% vs. 36.4%, NNT = 2.8) and remission (66.7% vs. 45.4%, NNT = 4.7) rates. CONCLUSION: As the sample size was small and participants evidenced only moderate levels of depression severity, the study risked being underpowered and idiosyncratic. Despite the small sample, the superiority of antidepressant medication to CBT in those with a melancholic depression was distinctive in this pilot study.
Authors: Lynn Boschloo; Ella Bekhuis; Erica S Weitz; Mirjam Reijnders; Robert J DeRubeis; Sona Dimidjian; David L Dunner; Boadie W Dunlop; Ulrich Hegerl; Steven D Hollon; Robin B Jarrett; Sidney H Kennedy; Jeanne Miranda; David C Mohr; Anne D Simons; Gordon Parker; Frank Petrak; Stephan Herpertz; Lena C Quilty; A John Rush; Zindel V Segal; Jeffrey R Vittengl; Robert A Schoevers; Pim Cuijpers Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Nils Kappelmann; Martin Rein; Julia Fietz; Helen S Mayberg; W Edward Craighead; Boadie W Dunlop; Charles B Nemeroff; Martin Keller; Daniel N Klein; Bruce A Arnow; Nusrat Husain; Robin B Jarrett; Jeffrey R Vittengl; Marco Menchetti; Gordon Parker; Jacques P Barber; Andre G Bastos; Jack Dekker; Jaap Peen; Martin E Keck; Johannes Kopf-Beck Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Matthew P Hyett; Gordon B Parker; Christine C Guo; Andrew Zalesky; Vinh T Nguyen; Tamara Yuen; Michael Breakspear Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-10-24 Impact factor: 4.881