Literature DB >> 23240629

Dynamic conservation of forest genetic resources in 33 European countries.

François Lefèvre1, Jarkko Koskela, Jason Hubert, Hojka Kraigher, Roman Longauer, Ditte C Olrik, Silvio Schüler, Michele Bozzano, Paraskevi Alizoti, Remigijus Bakys, Cathleen Baldwin, Dalibor Ballian, Sanna Black-Samuelsson, Dagmar Bednarova, Sándor Bordács, Eric Collin, Bart de Cuyper, Sven M G de Vries, Thröstur Eysteinsson, Josef Frýdl, Michaela Haverkamp, Mladen Ivankovic, Heino Konrad, Czesław Koziol, Tiit Maaten, Eduardo Notivol Paino, Hikmet Oztürk, Ivanova Denitsa Pandeva, Gheorghe Parnuta, Andrej Pilipovič, Dragos Postolache, Cathal Ryan, Arne Steffenrem, Maria Carolina Varela, Federico Vessella, Roman T Volosyanchuk, Marjana Westergren, Frank Wolter, Leena Yrjänä, Inga Zariŋa.   

Abstract

Dynamic conservation of forest genetic resources (FGR) means maintaining the genetic diversity of trees within an evolutionary process and allowing generation turnover in the forest. We assessed the network of forests areas managed for the dynamic conservation of FGR (conservation units) across Europe (33 countries). On the basis of information available in the European Information System on FGR (EUFGIS Portal), species distribution maps, and environmental stratification of the continent, we developed ecogeographic indicators, a marginality index, and demographic indicators to assess and monitor forest conservation efforts. The pan-European network has 1967 conservation units, 2737 populations of target trees, and 86 species of target trees. We detected a poor coincidence between FGR conservation and other biodiversity conservation objectives within this network. We identified 2 complementary strategies: a species-oriented strategy in which national conservation networks are specifically designed for key target species and a site-oriented strategy in which multiple-target units include so-called secondary species conserved within a few sites. The network is highly unbalanced in terms of species representation, and 7 key target species are conserved in 60% of the conservation units. We performed specific gap analyses for 11 tree species, including assessment of ecogeographic, demographic, and genetic criteria. For each species, we identified gaps, particularly in the marginal parts of their distribution range, and found multiple redundant conservation units in other areas. The Mediterranean forests and to a lesser extent the boreal forests are underrepresented. Monitoring the conservation efficiency of each unit remains challenging; however, <2% of the conserved populations seem to be at risk of extinction. On the basis of our results, we recommend combining species-oriented and site-oriented strategies.
© 2012 Society for Conservation Biology.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23240629     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01961.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  8 in total

1.  Challenges in cardiac device innovation: is neuroimaging an appropriate endpoint? Consensus from the 2013 Yale-UCL Cardiac Device Innovation Summit.

Authors:  Stephanie M Meller; Andreas Baumbach; Szilard Voros; Michael Mullen; Alexandra J Lansky
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Dynamic Gene-Resource Landscape Management of Norway Spruce: Combining Utilization and Conservation.

Authors:  Milan Lstibůrek; Yousry A El-Kassaby; Tore Skrøppa; Gary R Hodge; Jørn H Sønstebø; Arne Steffenrem
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Recent Fragmentation May Not Alter Genetic Patterns in Endangered Long-Lived Species: Evidence From Taxus cuspidata.

Authors:  Jinyuan Su; Yu Yan; Jia Song; Junqing Li; Jianfeng Mao; Nian Wang; Wenting Wang; Fang K Du
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 4.  Landscape Genomics in Tree Conservation Under a Changing Environment.

Authors:  Li Feng; Fang K Du
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Novel Insights Into Refugia at the Southern Margin of the Distribution Range of the Endangered Species Ulmus laevis.

Authors:  Sara Torre; Federico Sebastiani; Guia Burbui; Francesco Pecori; Alessia L Pepori; Iacopo Passeri; Luisa Ghelardini; Alberto Selvaggi; Alberto Santini
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Genomics and adaptation in forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Charalambos Neophytou; Katrin Heer; Pascal Milesi; Martina Peter; Tanja Pyhäjärvi; Marjana Westergren; Christian Rellstab; Felix Gugerli
Journal:  Tree Genet Genomes       Date:  2022-02-09

7.  Losing your edge: climate change and the conservation value of range-edge populations.

Authors:  Evan M Rehm; Paulo Olivas; James Stroud; Kenneth J Feeley
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Substantial variation in the timing of pollen production reduces reproductive synchrony between distant populations of Pinus sylvestris L. in Scotland.

Authors:  Richard Whittet; Stephen Cavers; Joan Cottrell; Cristina Rosique-Esplugas; Richard Ennos
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.