Bevin Cohen1, Sandra Hyman, Lauren Rosenberg, Elaine Larson. 1. Center for Interdisciplinary Research to Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York City, USA. BAC2116@columbia.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contact with health care workers may be an important means of infection transmission between patients, yet little is known about patterns of patient contact with staff and visitors in hospitals. In a cross-sectional study, the frequency, type, and duration of contacts made by health care workers, other hospital staff, and visitors to patients in acute care settings were documented. METHODS: Patients were observed in seven units of three academic hospitals, with recording of each occurrence of someone's entry into the patient's room. The health care worker's role, the duration of the visit, and the highest level of patient contact made were noted. Staff were also surveyed to determine their perception of how many patients per hour they come into contact with, how long they spend with patients, and the level of patient contact that occurs. FINDINGS: Hourly room entries ranged from 0 to 28 per patient (median, 5.5), and patients received visits from 0 to 18 different persons per hour (median, 3.5). Nurses made the most visits (45%), followed by personal visitors (23%), medical staff (17%), nonclinical staff (7%), and other clinical staff (4%). Visits lasted 1 to 124 minutes (median, 3 minutes for all groups). Persons entering patients' rooms touched nothing inside the room, only the environment, the patient's intact skin, or the patient's blood/body fluids 22%, 33%, 27%, and 18% of the time, respectively. Medical staff estimated visiting an average of 2.8 different patients per hour (range, 0.5-7.0), and nursing staff estimated visiting an average of 4.5 different patients per hour (range, 0.5-18.0). CONCLUSIONS: Examining patterns of patient contact may improve understanding of transmission dynamics in hospitals. New transmission models should consider the roles of health care workers beyond patients' assigned nurses and physicians.
BACKGROUND: Contact with health care workers may be an important means of infection transmission between patients, yet little is known about patterns of patient contact with staff and visitors in hospitals. In a cross-sectional study, the frequency, type, and duration of contacts made by health care workers, other hospital staff, and visitors to patients in acute care settings were documented. METHODS:Patients were observed in seven units of three academic hospitals, with recording of each occurrence of someone's entry into the patient's room. The health care worker's role, the duration of the visit, and the highest level of patient contact made were noted. Staff were also surveyed to determine their perception of how many patients per hour they come into contact with, how long they spend with patients, and the level of patient contact that occurs. FINDINGS: Hourly room entries ranged from 0 to 28 per patient (median, 5.5), and patients received visits from 0 to 18 different persons per hour (median, 3.5). Nurses made the most visits (45%), followed by personal visitors (23%), medical staff (17%), nonclinical staff (7%), and other clinical staff (4%). Visits lasted 1 to 124 minutes (median, 3 minutes for all groups). Persons entering patients' rooms touched nothing inside the room, only the environment, the patient's intact skin, or the patient's blood/body fluids 22%, 33%, 27%, and 18% of the time, respectively. Medical staff estimated visiting an average of 2.8 different patients per hour (range, 0.5-7.0), and nursing staff estimated visiting an average of 4.5 different patients per hour (range, 0.5-18.0). CONCLUSIONS: Examining patterns of patient contact may improve understanding of transmission dynamics in hospitals. New transmission models should consider the roles of health care workers beyond patients' assigned nurses and physicians.
Authors: M Delgado-Rodríguez; A Bueno-Cavanillas; R López-Gigosos; J de Dios Luna-Castillo; J Guillén-Solvas; O Moreno-Abril; B Rodríguez-Tuñas; A Cueto-Espinar; R Rodríguez-Contreras; R Gálvez-Vargas Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 1990-03 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Heather L Evans; Mary M Shaffer; Michael G Hughes; Robert L Smith; Tae W Chong; Daniel P Raymond; Shawn J Pelletier; Timothy L Pruett; Robert G Sawyer Journal: Surgery Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Richard E Nelson; Vanessa W Stevens; Karim Khader; Makoto Jones; Matthew H Samore; Martin E Evans; R Douglas Scott; Rachel B Slayton; Marin L Schweizer; Eli L Perencevich; Michael A Rubin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Fabrizio Spagnolo; Pierre Cristofari; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Lev R Ginzburg; Daniel E Dykhuizen Journal: ISME J Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Michael G Schmidt; Hubert H Attaway; Sarah E Fairey; Jayna Howard; Denise Mohr; Stephanie Craig Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Joy Uwemedimo; Deirdre Fitzgerald-Hughes; Peter Kinnevey; Anna Shore; David Coleman; Hilary Humphreys; Toney Thomas Poovelikunnel Journal: J Infect Prev Date: 2020-06-13
Authors: Christian R Kahlert; Raphael Persi; Sabine Güsewell; Thomas Egger; Onicio B Leal-Neto; Johannes Sumer; Domenica Flury; Angela Brucher; Eva Lemmenmeier; J Carsten Möller; Philip Rieder; Reto Stocker; Danielle Vuichard-Gysin; Benedikt Wiggli; Werner C Albrich; Baharak Babouee Flury; Ulrike Besold; Jan Fehr; Stefan P Kuster; Allison McGeer; Lorenz Risch; Matthias Schlegel; Andrée Friedl; Pietro Vernazza; Philipp Kohler Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 8.067