INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is a major cause of significant morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients. Blood culture remains the gold standard in the microbiological diagnosis of bacterial or fungal bloodstream infections, but it has clear limits of rapidity and sensitivity. The objective of the study was to compare the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with automated blood cultures (BC) method in detection in whole blood of pathogens in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS: A total of 166 consecutive febrile neutropenic patients were enrolled. Blood samples for cultures and SeptiFast testing were obtained at the onset of fever, before the implementation of empirical antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Forty (24.1%) samples out of the 166 blood samples tested, were positive by at least one method. Twenty-three (13.9%) samples were positive by blood culture and 38 (22.9%) by multiplex real-time PCR. The analysis of concordance evidenced a low correlation between the two methods (n = 21; 52.5%), mainly due to samples found negative by culture but positive with the Septi-Fast assay. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of RT-PCR were 91.3%, 88.1%, 55.3%, and 98.4%, respectively, compared with BC. DISCUSSION: Multiplex real-time PCR assay improved detection of the most bacteria associated with febrile neutropenia episodes. Further studies are needed to assess the real advantages and clinical benefits that molecular biology tests can add in diagnosis of sepsis.
INTRODUCTION:Sepsis is a major cause of significant morbidity and mortality in neutropenicpatients. Blood culture remains the gold standard in the microbiological diagnosis of bacterial or fungal bloodstream infections, but it has clear limits of rapidity and sensitivity. The objective of the study was to compare the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with automated blood cultures (BC) method in detection in whole blood of pathogens in febrile neutropenicpatients with hematological malignancies. METHODS: A total of 166 consecutive febrile neutropenicpatients were enrolled. Blood samples for cultures and SeptiFast testing were obtained at the onset of fever, before the implementation of empirical antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Forty (24.1%) samples out of the 166 blood samples tested, were positive by at least one method. Twenty-three (13.9%) samples were positive by blood culture and 38 (22.9%) by multiplex real-time PCR. The analysis of concordance evidenced a low correlation between the two methods (n = 21; 52.5%), mainly due to samples found negative by culture but positive with the Septi-Fast assay. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of RT-PCR were 91.3%, 88.1%, 55.3%, and 98.4%, respectively, compared with BC. DISCUSSION: Multiplex real-time PCR assay improved detection of the most bacteria associated with febrile neutropenia episodes. Further studies are needed to assess the real advantages and clinical benefits that molecular biology tests can add in diagnosis of sepsis.
Authors: Paul Dark; Bronagh Blackwood; Simon Gates; Danny McAuley; Gavin D Perkins; Ronan McMullan; Claire Wilson; Daniel Graham; Kate Timms; Geoffrey Warhurst Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-11-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ngo Tat Trung; Tran Thi Thu Hien; Tran Thi Thanh Huyen; Dao Thanh Quyen; Trinh Van Son; Phan Quoc Hoan; Nguyen Thi Kim Phuong; Tran Thi Lien; Mai Thanh Binh; Hoang Van Tong; Christian G Meyer; Thirumalaisamy P Velavan; Le Huu Song Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: W J Heinz; D Buchheidt; M Christopeit; M von Lilienfeld-Toal; O A Cornely; H Einsele; M Karthaus; H Link; R Mahlberg; S Neumann; H Ostermann; O Penack; M Ruhnke; M Sandherr; X Schiel; J J Vehreschild; F Weissinger; G Maschmeyer Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 3.673