BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) is an essential tool for assessing the quality of chronic disease management. The optimal method for delivering a PREMs survey however is unknown. This study reports two methods for assessing PREMs in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: A bespoke online and postal survey delivered to community-based CHF patients in Scotland. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients (73 postal and 48 online) completed the survey. The online cohort were younger, had less contact with a CHF nurse, were more likely to see a CHF doctor and seemed less satisfied with the quality of clinical services. The postal cohort returned fewer negative comments (20 [27.4%] vs 28 [58.3%]; p<0.0001). Several recurring themes were identified. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in participation rates and responses between postal and online surveys; the accuracy of the feedback gathered using these methods is therefore difficult to determine. Clinicians should consider offering a range of options to enable patients to reflect and 'voice' their opinions regarding clinical services.
BACKGROUND:Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) is an essential tool for assessing the quality of chronic disease management. The optimal method for delivering a PREMs survey however is unknown. This study reports two methods for assessing PREMs in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: A bespoke online and postal survey delivered to community-based CHFpatients in Scotland. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients (73 postal and 48 online) completed the survey. The online cohort were younger, had less contact with a CHF nurse, were more likely to see a CHF doctor and seemed less satisfied with the quality of clinical services. The postal cohort returned fewer negative comments (20 [27.4%] vs 28 [58.3%]; p<0.0001). Several recurring themes were identified. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in participation rates and responses between postal and online surveys; the accuracy of the feedback gathered using these methods is therefore difficult to determine. Clinicians should consider offering a range of options to enable patients to reflect and 'voice' their opinions regarding clinical services.
Authors: Anne Louise Depla; Marije Lamain-de Ruiter; Lyzette T Laureij; Hiske E Ernst-Smelt; Jan A Hazelzet; Arie Franx; Mireille N Bekker Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 7.076