Literature DB >> 23239856

Cytotoxicity of dental compounds towards human oral squamous cell carcinoma and normal oral cells.

Teho Koh1, Mamoru Machino, Yukio Murakami, Naoki Umemura, Hiroshi Sakagami.   

Abstract

AIM: The cytotoxicity of four dental compounds, hydroquinone, benzoquinone, eugenol and phtharal towards human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines, normal human oral cells (gingival fibroblast, pulp cell, periodontal ligament fibroblast) and skin keratinocytes was investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Viable cell number was determined by the 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) method. The concentration that reduced the viable cells by 50% (CC(50)) and the concentration that increased the viability of UV-irradiated cells to 50% (EC(50)) were determined from the dose-response curves. The tumor-specificity index (TS) was determined by the ratio of the mean CC(50) for normal cells to the one for tumor cells. Apoptosis induction was monitored by assay of internucleosomal DNA fragmentation and caspase-3/-7 activation.
RESULTS: When both oral OSCC and normal oral cells were incubated for 4 h with any of hydroquinone, benzoquinone, eugenol and phtharal, irreversible cell growth inhibition, accompanied by cell death occurred without induction of apoptotic markers, although caspase-3/-7 activation was observed at 6 h or later. These compounds exhibited very low tumor-specificity (TS=0.4-1.3), as compared with anticancer drugs (5-fluorouracil, melphalan, peplomycin) (TS=4.1-9.7). Human skin keratinocytes were the most resistant to these drugs, and a long incubation time was required to induce irreversible growth inhibition. However, all dental compounds exhibited very low tumor-specificity (TS=0.4-2.4), compared to human skin keratinocytes and OSCC cell lines. None of the dental compounds exhibited any hormetic growth stimulation, nor protected the cells from UV-induced damage.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that apoptosis is not involved in the early stage of growth inhibition induced by dental compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23239856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of UVC Sensitivity and Dectin-2 Expression Between Malignant and Non-malignant Cells.

Authors:  Ayaka Shindo; Midori Kusano; Hiroshi Sakagami; Shigeru Amano; Megumi Inomata; Masayo Abe; Masashi Okazawa; Takafumi Ooka
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  The Dual Antioxidant/Prooxidant Effect of Eugenol and Its Action in Cancer Development and Treatment.

Authors:  Daniel Pereira Bezerra; Gardenia Carmen Gadelha Militão; Mayara Castro de Morais; Damião Pergentino de Sousa
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-12-17       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 3.  Pleiotropic Effects of Eugenol: The Good, the Bad, and the Unknown.

Authors:  Oana M Aburel; Ioana Z Pavel; Maria D Dănilă; Theia Lelcu; Alexandra Roi; Rodica Lighezan; Danina M Muntean; Laura C Rusu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.543

4.  In Vitro Assessment of the Cytotoxic and Antiproliferative Profile of Natural Preparations Containing Bergamot, Orange and Clove Essential Oils.

Authors:  Vlad Tiberiu Alexa; Atena Galuscan; Codruța M Soica; Antoanela Cozma; Dorina Coricovac; Florin Borcan; Iuliana Popescu; Alexandra Mioc; Camelia Szuhanek; Cristina Adriana Dehelean; Daniela Jumanca
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.