PURPOSE: To estimate the local thermal conductivity of porcine thigh muscle at temperatures required for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) surgery (60-90°C). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using MRgHIFU, we performed 40 volumetric ablations in the thigh muscles of four pigs. Thirty-five of the sonications were successful. We used MRI to monitor the resulting temperature increase. We then determined local thermal conductivity by analyzing the spatiotemporal spread of temperature during the cooling period. RESULTS: The thermal conductivity of MRgHIFU-treated porcine thigh muscle fell within a narrow range (0.52 ± 0.05 W/[m*K]), which is within the range reported for porcine thigh muscle at temperatures of <40°C (0.52 to 0.62 W/[m*K]). Thus, there was little change in the thermal conductivity of porcine thigh muscle at temperatures required for MRgHIFU surgery compared to lower temperatures. CONCLUSION: Our MRgHIFU-based approach allowed us to estimate, with good reproducibility, the local thermal conductivity of in vivo deep tissue in real time at temperatures of 60°C to 90°C. Therefore, our method provides a valuable tool for quantifying the influence of thermal conductivity on temperature distribution in tissues and for optimizing thermal dose delivery during thermal ablation with clinical MRgHIFU.
PURPOSE: To estimate the local thermal conductivity of porcine thigh muscle at temperatures required for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) surgery (60-90°C). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using MRgHIFU, we performed 40 volumetric ablations in the thigh muscles of four pigs. Thirty-five of the sonications were successful. We used MRI to monitor the resulting temperature increase. We then determined local thermal conductivity by analyzing the spatiotemporal spread of temperature during the cooling period. RESULTS: The thermal conductivity of MRgHIFU-treated porcine thigh muscle fell within a narrow range (0.52 ± 0.05 W/[m*K]), which is within the range reported for porcine thigh muscle at temperatures of <40°C (0.52 to 0.62 W/[m*K]). Thus, there was little change in the thermal conductivity of porcine thigh muscle at temperatures required for MRgHIFU surgery compared to lower temperatures. CONCLUSION: Our MRgHIFU-based approach allowed us to estimate, with good reproducibility, the local thermal conductivity of in vivo deep tissue in real time at temperatures of 60°C to 90°C. Therefore, our method provides a valuable tool for quantifying the influence of thermal conductivity on temperature distribution in tissues and for optimizing thermal dose delivery during thermal ablation with clinical MRgHIFU.
Authors: Sara L Johnson; Christopher Dillon; Henrik Odéen; Dennis Parker; Douglas Christensen; Allison Payne Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 3.914