RATIONALE: Identification of sites of protein SUMOylation is of great importance due its functional diversity within the cell. To date, most approaches to this problem rely on site-directed mutagenesis and/or highly specialised mass spectrometry approaches. We present a novel alternative approach to the site mapping of SUMOylation using trypsin and elastase digestion, routine mass spectrometry and an unbiased isotag database searching strategy. METHODS: SUMOylated protein samples were digested with a number of enzymes and the resulting peptides separated using liquid chromatography. Analysis was carried out on both linear ion trap Orbitrap and quadrupole-time-of-flight (Q-TOF)-based mass spectrometers equipped with electrospray ionisation. The data files were subsequently searched using the Mascot algorithm with multiple variable tag modifications corresponding to SUMO-derived fragments. The utility of this approach was demonstrated with di-SUMO 2, di-SUMO 3, SUMO 1-RanGap(418-587) 1 and an enriched population of SUMOylated proteins. RESULTS: Unbiased database searches led to the identification of a number of analytically useful isotags ranging in length from two to four residues. Isopeptide fragments were generated including QTGG (di-SUMO-2/3), TGG (di-SUMO-2/3) and GG (SUMO-1). The method was validated by successfully mapping a number of sites of SUMO modification on SUMO-modified proteins enriched from a cell lysate. CONCLUSIONS: This combination of relaxed enzyme specificity, shortened isotag generation and unbiased database searching enabled confident identification of novel analytically useful SUMOylated isopeptides without a requirement for mutagenesis.
RATIONALE: Identification of sites of protein SUMOylation is of great importance due its functional diversity within the cell. To date, most approaches to this problem rely on site-directed mutagenesis and/or highly specialised mass spectrometry approaches. We present a novel alternative approach to the site mapping of SUMOylation using trypsin and elastase digestion, routine mass spectrometry and an unbiased isotag database searching strategy. METHODS: SUMOylated protein samples were digested with a number of enzymes and the resulting peptides separated using liquid chromatography. Analysis was carried out on both linear ion trap Orbitrap and quadrupole-time-of-flight (Q-TOF)-based mass spectrometers equipped with electrospray ionisation. The data files were subsequently searched using the Mascot algorithm with multiple variable tag modifications corresponding to SUMO-derived fragments. The utility of this approach was demonstrated with di-SUMO 2, di-SUMO 3, SUMO 1-RanGap(418-587) 1 and an enriched population of SUMOylated proteins. RESULTS: Unbiased database searches led to the identification of a number of analytically useful isotags ranging in length from two to four residues. Isopeptide fragments were generated including QTGG (di-SUMO-2/3), TGG (di-SUMO-2/3) and GG (SUMO-1). The method was validated by successfully mapping a number of sites of SUMO modification on SUMO-modified proteins enriched from a cell lysate. CONCLUSIONS: This combination of relaxed enzyme specificity, shortened isotag generation and unbiased database searching enabled confident identification of novel analytically useful SUMOylated isopeptides without a requirement for mutagenesis.
Authors: John R Griffiths; Navin Chicooree; Yvonne Connolly; Milla Neffling; Catherine S Lane; Thomas Knapman; Duncan L Smith Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Jirapas Jongjitwimol; Min Feng; Lihong Zhou; Oliver Wilkinson; Lauren Small; Robert Baldock; Deborah L Taylor; Duncan Smith; Lucas D Bowler; Simon J Morley; Felicity Z Watts Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240