Literature DB >> 23239288

Effect of transgastric peritoneal access on peritoneal innate cellular immunity: experimental study in swine.

Rodrigo Rodrigues1, Marcelo Rezende, Gustavo Gomes, Fernando Souza, Maiara Blagitz, Alice Della Libera, Murched Taha, Angelo Ferrari, Ermelindo Della Libera.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the main concerns of natural orifice surgery is the local and systemic impact on physiology. Few studies have compared natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with other surgical modalities. Most studies are based on systemic variables such as postoperative serum cytokines, with conflicting results. Surgical trauma induces an early inflammatory response, release of cytokines, and local leukocyte activation and oxidative burst. Major surgical trauma is related to impairment of phagocytic function and an increase in production of active oxygen species by phagocytes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of transgastric peritoneoscopy on peritoneal innate immune response compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy in swine.
METHODS: Thirty-four male Sus scrofa domesticus swine were assigned to four groups: transgastric peritoneoscopy (13), laparoscopy (7), laparotomy (7), and sham procedure (7). Twenty-four hours after the procedure, peritoneal fluid cells were harvested by peritoneal washing after necropsy. Flow cytometry analysis of labeled S. aureus and E. coli phagocytosis by peritoneal neutrophils and macrophages was blindly performed. Oxidative burst activity measured by H(2)O(2) production under different challenges was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Total operative time varied between all groups. The transgastric, laparoscopy, and laparotomy groups required 56, 17.2, and 40.3 min of mean operative time, respectively (p < 0.05). Even though the mean percentage and intensity of phagocytosis by peritoneal phagocytes were higher in the sham, transgastric, and laparoscopy groups, there was no significant difference between these groups and laparotomy. Macrophage production of H(2)O(2) has been shown to be similar among the transgastric, laparoscopy, and sham groups, and smaller than that in laparotomy (p < 0.05), either under basal conditions, while performing E. coli phagocytosis, or challenged by the presence of E. coli membrane lipopolysaccharide.
CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, transgastric peritoneoscopy has been shown to have minimal impact on peritoneal innate immune response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23239288     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2541-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Effects of laparotomy on systemic macrophage function.

Authors:  H P Redmond; K Hofmann; J Shou; P Leon; C J Kelly; J M Daly
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response.

Authors:  F J Vittimberga; D P Foley; W C Meyers; M P Callery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Neutrophils, host defense, and inflammation: a double-edged sword.

Authors:  J A Smith
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.962

4.  Immunologic parameters during NOTES compared with laparoscopy in a randomized blinded porcine trial.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener; Naveen K Krishnegowda; Joel E Michalek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Phagocytosis by emigrated, intra-abdominal neutrophils is depressed during human secondary peritonitis.

Authors:  Katharina Holzer; P Konietzny; Kerstin Wilhelm; A Encke; D Henrich
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.745

6.  Comparison of peritoneal oxidative stress during laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Authors:  Angela M Bentes de Souza; Michael Scott Rogers; Chi Chiu Wang; Pong Mo Yuen; Pui Shan Ng
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2003-02

Review 7.  Surgical trauma: hyperinflammation versus immunosuppression?

Authors:  Michael D Menger; Brigitte Vollmar
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: Initial clinical trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Hazey; Vimal K Narula; David B Renton; Kevin M Reavis; Christopher M Paul; Kristen E Hinshaw; Peter Muscarella; E Christopher Ellison; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Submucosal tunneling using endoscopic submucosal dissection for peritoneal access and closure in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a porcine survival study.

Authors:  F Yoshizumi; K Yasuda; K Kawaguchi; K Suzuki; N Shiraishi; S Kitano
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Oxygen radicals, lipid peroxidation, and permeability changes after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion.

Authors:  J W Horton; P B Walker
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1993-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.