OBJECTIVE: To test whether brain activity predicts the response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Since clinical and laboratory parameters have proven unsuccessful in predicting response, we followed a radically different concept, hypothesizing that response to TNFi depends on central nervous system activity rather than the clinical signs of disease. METHODS: Sequential testing by functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, anatomic MRI of the hand, and clinical assessment of arthritis were carried out in 10 patients with active RA before and 3, 7, and 28 days after the start of TNFi treatment. RESULTS: Baseline demographic and disease-specific parameters were identical in TNFi responders and nonresponders. The mean ± SEM decrease in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints after 28 days was -1.8 ± 0.3 in TNFi responders (n = 5) and -0.2 ± 0.1 in nonresponders (n = 5). Responders showed significantly higher baseline activation in thalamic, limbic, and associative areas of the brain than nonresponders. Moreover, brain activity decreased within 3 days after TNFi exposure in the responders, preceding clinical responses (day 7) and responses observed on the anatomic hand MRI (day 28). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that response to TNFi depends on brain activity in RA patients, reflecting the subjective perception of disease.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether brain activity predicts the response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Since clinical and laboratory parameters have proven unsuccessful in predicting response, we followed a radically different concept, hypothesizing that response to TNFi depends on central nervous system activity rather than the clinical signs of disease. METHODS: Sequential testing by functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, anatomic MRI of the hand, and clinical assessment of arthritis were carried out in 10 patients with active RA before and 3, 7, and 28 days after the start of TNFi treatment. RESULTS: Baseline demographic and disease-specific parameters were identical in TNFi responders and nonresponders. The mean ± SEM decrease in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints after 28 days was -1.8 ± 0.3 in TNFi responders (n = 5) and -0.2 ± 0.1 in nonresponders (n = 5). Responders showed significantly higher baseline activation in thalamic, limbic, and associative areas of the brain than nonresponders. Moreover, brain activity decreased within 3 days after TNFi exposure in the responders, preceding clinical responses (day 7) and responses observed on the anatomic hand MRI (day 28). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that response to TNFi depends on brain activity in RApatients, reflecting the subjective perception of disease.
Authors: Csaba Oláh; Zsófia Kardos; Mónika Andrejkovics; Enikő Szarka; Katalin Hodosi; Andrea Domján; Mariann Sepsi; Attila Sas; László Kostyál; Katalin Fazekas; Ágnes Flórián; Katalin Lukács; Ágnes Miksi; Zsuzsanna Baráth; György Kerekes; Márta Péntek; Attila Valikovics; László Tamási; Dániel Bereczki; Zoltán Szekanecz Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: H-G Schaible; H-D Chang; S Grässel; H Haibel; A Hess; T Kamradt; A Radbruch; G Schett; C Stein; R H Straub Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 1.372
Authors: Jaymin Upadhyay; Christian Geber; Richard Hargreaves; Frank Birklein; David Borsook Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2017-08-12 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Pamela F Weiss; Nancy A Chauvin; Andrew J Klink; Russell Localio; Chris Feudtner; Diego Jaramillo; Robert A Colbert; David D Sherry; Ron Keren Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Owen Carmichael; Adam J Schwarz; Christopher H Chatham; David Scott; Jessica A Turner; Jaymin Upadhyay; Alexandre Coimbra; James A Goodman; Richard Baumgartner; Brett A English; John W Apolzan; Preetham Shankapal; Keely R Hawkins Journal: Drug Discov Today Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 7.851
Authors: H M Schenker; K Tascilar; L Konerth; M Sergeeva; J Prade; S Strobelt; A Kleyer; D Simon; L Mendez; M Hagen; V Schönau; A Hueber; J Roesch; A Dörfler; A Hess; G Schett; J Rech Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2021-05-04