Literature DB >> 23238845

The neurological and ophthalmological manifestations of SPG4-related hereditary spastic paraplegia.

Grant Guthrie, Gerald Pfeffer, Maura Bailie, Karen Bradshaw, Andrew C Browning, Rita Horvath, Patrick F Chinnery, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23238845      PMCID: PMC3590400          DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6780-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Sirs, The hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a genetically heterogeneous group of disorders characterised by progressive corticospinal tract degeneration and the development of lower limb spasticity [1, 2]. Autosomal-dominant HSP is the most commonly inherited form of the disease and in this group, SPG4 mutations account for ~40 % of cases [1]. The SPG4 gene codes for spastin, a critical neuronal protein that maintains organelle axonal transport by severing and rearranging the microtubule network [3, 4]. Dysfunctional mutant proteins or insufficient quantities of the wild-type protein inhibit this dynamic shuttling process resulting in axonal swelling and progressive retrograde degeneration that preferentially affects the long corticospinal axons [3, 4]. There is mounting evidence that the microtubule and mitochondrial networks are intrinsically linked at the cellular level [5]. This intriguing association has recently been highlighted by the clinical observation that autosomal-dominant optic atrophy (DOA)—a classical mitochondrial optic neuropathy caused by pathogenic OPA1 mutations—can result in complicated neurological phenotypes (DOA+) with features indistinguishable from HSP [6]. Furthermore, subclinical corticospinal tract dysfunction also seems to be a prevalent feature among OPA1 mutation carriers presenting with isolated visual failure, suggesting a wider disease spectrum than originally considered [7]. Interestingly, these overlapping genotype-phenotype manifestations have been reported previously in families with a rarer, autosomal-recessive form of HSP caused by pathogenic SPG7 mutations, in which bilateral optic atrophy was a prominent feature segregating with spastic paraplegia [8-10]. Given the emerging disease mechanisms linking corticospinal tract dysfunction with optic nerve degeneration, the aim of this study was to determine the neurological and ophthalmological manifestations of SPG4-related HSP, looking specifically for evidence of clinical or subclinical optic neuropathy among affected patients. The overall neurological disability, including cognitive function, was also evaluated to provide a comprehensive assessment of the burden of disease in this group of patients. A comprehensive neurological (GP, RH, PFC) and ophthalmological (PYWM) assessment (Supplementary Method) was carried out on ten white patients from the North of England harbouring confirmed pathogenic SPG4 mutations (Table 1). A broad spectrum of neurological disability was observed among affected patients with scores ranging from one to nine on the modified EDSS scale (Table 2). Importantly, four patients had abnormal MOCA scores of less than 26 points. Seven patients performed poorly on the memory component of the MOCA test protocol and one patient had abnormal visuospatial/executive performance. The association between SPG4 mutations and progressive cognitive decline remains controversial [11-13] and our study of a well-characterised patient cohort provides further evidence favouring a true causal link. Two of the patients with abnormal MOCA scores were younger than the age of 30 years, clearly highlighting the need for clinical vigilance to detect early signs of cognitive impairment and to provide adequate level of support, especially to carers.
Table 1

Molecular genetic and ophthalmological features of the SPG4 patient cohort

PatientSexAge (years)SPG4 mutationBCVA RE-LEOptic discs/OCT measurementsEye movementsVisual electrophysiology
ExoncDNA change/consequence
1F315c.743C>G/p.S245X20/20-20/20Normal/no RNFL thinningNormalNormal
2M535c.743C>G/p.S245X20/20-20/20Normal/no RNFL thinningHorizontal SWJ/saccadic pursuitNormal
3F506c.937delG/p.D313fsX120/20-20/20Normal/no RNFL thinningNormalNormal
4F554–17del exon 4-17/large-scale deletion20/20-20/20Normal/no RNFL thinningNormalNormal
5F2910c.1253_1255delAAG/p.E418fsX19820/20-20/20Normal/no RNFL thinningHorizontal SWJ/saccadic pursuitNormal
6F2511c.1442_1443insA/p.V482fsX520/20-20/20Normal/no RNFL thinningNormalNormal
7F5511c.1442_1443insA/p.V482fsX520/20-20/20Normal/no RNFL thinningHorizontal SWJ/saccadic pursuitNormal
8F4911c.1414G>A/p.V472I20/20-20/20Normal/no RNFL thinningNormalNormal
9F7211c.1384A>G/p.K462E20/60-20/30Normal/no RNFL thinningNormalNormal
10M6511c.1081C>A; c.1082T>A/p.L361N20/20-20/20Normal/no RNFL thinningNormalNormal

BCVA best-corrected visual acuities, cDNA complementary DNA, LE left eye, OCT optical coherence tomography, RE right eye, RNFL retinal nerve fibre layer, SWJ square wave jerks

Table 2

Neurological and cognitive features of the SPG4 patient cohort

PatientCognitive assessment (MOCA)Motor examinationVibration senseOther findingsDisability measurements
Modified Ashworth spasticity scoreDeep tendon reflexesPower (MRC scale)Coordination
ScoreCommentsL/R EL/R KL/R BRL/R BL/R TL/R PL/R APRUL ex/flLL fl/ex10 m walkModified EDSS
127/303 points from memory0, 03, 33, 33, 33, 34, 42, 2Ex5, 54, 5ATAnkles19.1 s6.5
227/304 points from memory0, 01, 12, 22, 22, 23, 32, 2Fl5, 55, 5NN8.2 s1
327/302 points each from visuospatial/executive and attention0, 01, 12, 22, 22, 23, 32, 2Ex5, 54, 4NKnees10.1 s2
427/303 points from memory0, 02, 23, 33, 32, 23, 32, 2Ex5, 54, 3–4NKneesMarked LL oedemaWC7
523/303 points from memory3, 34, 43, 33, 33, 33, 34, 4Ex4, 40, 0NKneesSpastic dysarthriaWC9
625/303 points from memory0, 01, 12, 22, 22, 23, 33, 3Fl5, 55, 5NN8.9 s1
725/305 points from memory0, 03, 32, 23, 33, 34, 43, 3Ex5, 54, 5NAnkles13.4 s4
829/300, 03, 32, 22, 22, 24, 44, 4Ex5, 54, 4NN11.3 s2
1025/304 points from memory1, 12, 22, 22, 22, 23, 33, 3Ex5, 54, 4NAnklesTwo canes needed for walking36.6 s6.5

Patient nine was not available for this portion of the assessment. A total MOCA score of 26 or higher is considered normal. For subjects with 12 years of total education or less, an additional point is added. MOCA scores lower than 26 are suggestive of cognitive impairment [14]. Vibration sense has been reported as the lowest normal testing location. Published normative range for the 10 m walk test protocol: mean 6.7 s, 95 % confidence interval 5.6–7.9 s [15]

A Achilles, AT action tremor, B biceps, BR brachioradialis, E elbow, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale, Ex extensor, Fl flexor, K knee, L left, LL lower limbs, m metres, MOCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, MRC Medical Research Council, N normal, PR plantar responses, R right, s seconds, T triceps, UL upper limbs, WC wheelchair-bound

Molecular genetic and ophthalmological features of the SPG4 patient cohort BCVA best-corrected visual acuities, cDNA complementary DNA, LE left eye, OCT optical coherence tomography, RE right eye, RNFL retinal nerve fibre layer, SWJ square wave jerks Neurological and cognitive features of the SPG4 patient cohort Patient nine was not available for this portion of the assessment. A total MOCA score of 26 or higher is considered normal. For subjects with 12 years of total education or less, an additional point is added. MOCA scores lower than 26 are suggestive of cognitive impairment [14]. Vibration sense has been reported as the lowest normal testing location. Published normative range for the 10 m walk test protocol: mean 6.7 s, 95 % confidence interval 5.6–7.9 s [15] A Achilles, AT action tremor, B biceps, BR brachioradialis, E elbow, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale, Ex extensor, Fl flexor, K knee, L left, LL lower limbs, m metres, MOCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, MRC Medical Research Council, N normal, PR plantar responses, R right, s seconds, T triceps, UL upper limbs, WC wheelchair-bound Except for one patient who had bilateral nuclear sclerotic cataracts, all patients had best-corrected visual acuities of 20/20 bilaterally (Table 1). The ophthalmological examination was normal with full colour discrimination and no detectable optic disc or retinal abnormalities. Visual fields, RNFL thickness measurements and visual electrophysiology were within the normal range for the entire HSP patient cohort. Three patients had abnormal eye movements with horizontal square wave jerks and saccadic smooth pursuits. No significant ptosis or limitation of eye movements was noted on orthoptic assessment. Based on our comprehensive clinical and electrophysiological evaluation, visual loss secondary to optic nerve or retinal degeneration is unlikely to be a major phenotypic manifestation of SPG4-related disease. Affected patients and at-risk family members can therefore be reassured that unlike other genetically-determined forms of HSP [6-10], SPG4 mutations are not associated with the development of significant ophthalmological complications, in particular visual failure. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (DOC 80 kb)
  14 in total

1.  Hereditary spastic paraparesis: disrupted intracellular transport associated with spastin mutation.

Authors:  Christopher J McDermott; Andrew J Grierson; Jonathan D Wood; Megan Bingley; Stephen B Wharton; Katharine M D Bushby; Pamela J Shaw
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 2.  Hereditary spastic paraplegia: clinical features and pathogenetic mechanisms.

Authors:  Sara Salinas; Christos Proukakis; Andrew Crosby; Thomas T Warner
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 3.  Mitochondria: the next (neurode)generation.

Authors:  Eric A Schon; Serge Przedborski
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Subclinical multisystem neurologic disease in "pure" OPA1 autosomal dominant optic atrophy.

Authors:  M R Baker; K M Fisher; R G Whittaker; P G Griffiths; P Yu-Wai-Man; P F Chinnery
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Classification of the hereditary ataxias and paraplegias.

Authors:  A E Harding
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-05-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  The AAA ATPase spastin links microtubule severing to membrane modelling.

Authors:  Jennifer H Lumb; James W Connell; Rachel Allison; Evan Reid
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-08-25

7.  Genotype-phenotype correlations in spastic paraplegia type 7: a study in a large Dutch cohort.

Authors:  Koen L I van Gassen; Charlotte D C C van der Heijden; Susanne T de Bot; Wilfred F A den Dunnen; Leonard H van den Berg; Corien C Verschuuren-Bemelmans; H P H Kremer; Jan H Veldink; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg; Hans Scheffer; Bart P van de Warrenburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Dementia in SPG4 hereditary spastic paraplegia: clinical, genetic, and neuropathologic evidence.

Authors:  S Murphy; G Gorman; C Beetz; P Byrne; M Dytko; P McMonagle; K Kinsella; M Farrell; M Hutchinson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Subtle cognitive impairment but no dementia in patients with spastin mutations.

Authors:  Chantal M E Tallaksen; Elodie Guichart-Gomez; Patrice Verpillat; Valerie Hahn-Barma; Merle Ruberg; Bertrand Fontaine; Alexis Brice; Bruno Dubois; Alexandra Durr
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2003-08

10.  Spastic paraplegia and OXPHOS impairment caused by mutations in paraplegin, a nuclear-encoded mitochondrial metalloprotease.

Authors:  G Casari; M De Fusco; S Ciarmatori; M Zeviani; M Mora; P Fernandez; G De Michele; A Filla; S Cocozza; R Marconi; A Dürr; B Fontaine; A Ballabio
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-06-12       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Tau missorting and spastin-induced microtubule disruption in neurodegeneration: Alzheimer Disease and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

Authors:  Hans Zempel; Eva-Maria Mandelkow
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 14.195

2.  Abnormal retinal thickening is a common feature among patients with ARSACS-related phenotypes.

Authors:  Patrick Yu-Wai-Man; Angela Pyle; Helen Griffin; Mauro Santibanez-Korev; Rita Horvath; Patrick F Chinnery
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Usefulness of comprehensive targeted multigene panel sequencing for neuromuscular disorders in Korean patients.

Authors:  Jihye Park; Hyun Mi Oh; Hye Jung Park; Ah-Ra Cho; Dong-Woo Lee; Ja-Hyun Jang; Dae-Hyun Jang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  Clinical Characterization of 2 Siblings with a Homozygous SPAST Variant.

Authors:  Héctor Cruz-Camino; Mercedes Vázquez-Cantú; Diana Laura Vázquez-Cantú; Jesús Santos-Guzmán; Antonio Bandala-Jacques; René Gómez-Gutiérrez; Consuelo Cantú-Reyna
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-11

5.  Genetic testing in individuals with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Halie J May; Jennifer A Fasheun; Jennifer M Bain; Evan H Baugh; Louise E Bier; Anya Revah-Politi; David P Roye; David B Goldstein; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.864

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.