Literature DB >> 23238844

Cancer family history triage: a key step in the decision to offer screening and genetic testing.

Paul Brennan1, Oonagh Claber, Tracey Brennan.   

Abstract

The Macmillan Cancer Family History Service in Teesside has provided genetic risk assessment for individuals with a personal or family history of cancer since 2004. We sought to examine the effect of risk assessment on patient management, with particular emphasis on referral for clinical screening and selection of families for tertiary genetics assessment. The degree of concordance between the initial risk assignment (using diagnoses reported by the family) and final risk assignment (using confirmed diagnoses) was no greater than 72.3 % in 1,363 breast cancer families; a similar effect was seen in 764 colorectal cancer families (77.3 %). Clinically important risk reassignment occurred at the three key stages in the risk assessment pathway. Overall, genetic risk was reassigned in almost 30 % of colorectal families and 20 % of breast cancer families, resulting in a change in screening recommendation and/or referral for tertiary genetic assessment. Careful, detailed family history assessment, with confirmation of reported diagnoses where it may affect risk assignment, is an important process for the point of view of patient management and resource allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23238844     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9589-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  18 in total

1.  The accuracy of diagnoses as reported in families with cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  F S Douglas; L C O'Dair; M Robinson; D G Evans; S A Lynch
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Clinically relevant changes in family history of cancer over time.

Authors:  Argyrios Ziogas; Nora K Horick; Anita Y Kinney; Jan T Lowery; Susan M Domchek; Claudine Isaacs; Constance A Griffin; Patricia G Moorman; Karen L Edwards; Deirdre A Hill; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Tomlinson; Hoda Anton-Culver; Louise C Strong; Carol H Kasten; Dianne M Finkelstein; Sharon E Plon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Using tumour pathology to identify people at high genetic risk of breast and colorectal cancers.

Authors:  J L Hopper; M A Jenkins; J G Dowty; G S Dite; C Apicella; L Keogh; A K Win; J P Young; D Buchanan; M D Walsh; C Rosty; L Baglietto; G Severi; K A Phillips; E M Wong; A Dobrovic; P Waring; I Winship; S J Ramus; G G Giles; M C Southey
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.306

4.  Psychological and genetic counseling implications for adolescent daughters of mothers with breast cancer.

Authors:  M Cappelli; S Verma; Y Korneluk; A Hunter; E Tomiak; J Allanson; C DeGrasse; L Corsini; L Humphreys
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Factors influencing patients' decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services.

Authors:  K P Geer; M E Ropka; W F Cohn; S M Jones; S Miesfeldt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Accuracy of reporting of family history of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Mitchell; D Brewster; H Campbell; M E M Porteous; A H Wyllie; C C Bird; M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  The effectiveness of family history questionnaires in cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Susan Randall Armel; Jeanna McCuaig; Amy Finch; Rochelle Demsky; Tony Panzarella; Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  The prevalence of a family history of cancer in general practice.

Authors:  N Johnson; T Lancaster; A Fuller; S V Hodgson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 9.  The current state of cancer family history collection tools in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nadeem Qureshi; June C Carroll; Brenda Wilson; Pasqualina Santaguida; Judith Allanson; Melissa Brouwers; Parminder Raina
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Cancer family history reporting: impact of method and psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Randi Shedlosky-Shoemaker; Kyle Porter; Amber Remy; Philip DeSimone; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.717

View more
  4 in total

1.  Matrix metalloproteinase 9 gene polymorphisms are associated with a multiple family history of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Rieko Okada; Mariko Naito; Yuta Hattori; Toshio Seiki; Kenji Wakai; Hinako Nanri; Miki Watanabe; Sadao Suzuki; Tara Sefanya Kairupan; Naoyuki Takashima; Haruo Mikami; Keizo Ohnaka; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Sakurako Katsuura-Kamano; Michiaki Kubo; Nobuyuki Hamajima; Hideo Tanaka
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Why do women not return family history forms when referred to breast cancer genetics services? A mixed-method study.

Authors:  Kirstie A Hanning; Michael Steel; David Goudie; Lorna McLeish; Jackie Dunlop; Jessica Myring; Frank Sullivan; Jonathan Berg; Gerry Humphris; Gozde Ozakinci
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Clinically relevant lessons from Family HealthLink: a cancer and coronary heart disease familial risk assessment tool.

Authors:  Kevin Sweet; Amy C Sturm; Amy Rettig; Joseph McElroy; Doreen Agnese
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 4.  Gender differences in self-reported family history of cancer: A review and secondary data analysis.

Authors:  Monika Sieverding; Anna Lisa Arbogast; Stephanie Zintel; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.