Literature DB >> 23238423

Motion detection technology as a tool for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality training: a randomised crossover mannequin pilot study.

Federico Semeraro1, Antonio Frisoli, Claudio Loconsole, Filippo Bannò, Gaetano Tammaro, Guglielmo Imbriaco, Luca Marchetti, Erga L Cerchiari.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Outcome after cardiac arrest is dependent on the quality of chest compressions (CC). A great number of devices have been developed to provide guidance during CPR. The present study evaluates a new CPR feedback system (Mini-VREM: Mini-Virtual Reality Enhanced Mannequin) designed to improve CC during training.
METHODS: Mini-VREM system consists of a Kinect(®) (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) motion sensing device and specifically developed software to provide audio-visual feedback. Mini-VREM was connected to a commercially available mannequin (Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway). Eighty trainees (healthcare professionals and lay people) volunteered in this randomised crossover pilot study. All subjects performed a 2 min CC trial, 1h pause and a second 2 min CC trial. The first group (FB/NFB, n=40) performed CC with Mini-VREM feedback (FB) followed by CC without feedback (NFB). The second group (NFB/FB, n=40) performed vice versa. Primary endpoints: adequate compression (compression rate between 100 and 120 min(-1) and compression depth between 50 and 60mm); compressions rate within 100-120 min(-1); compressions depth within 50-60mm.
RESULTS: When compared to the performance without feedback, with Mini-VREM feedback compressions were more adequate (FB 35.78% vs. NFB 7.27%, p<0.001) and more compressions achieved target rate (FB 72.04% vs. 31.42%, p<0.001) and target depth (FB 47.34% vs. 24.87%, p=0.002). The participants perceived the system to be easy to use with effective feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-VREM system was able to improve significantly the CC performance by healthcare professionals and by lay people in a simulated CA scenario, in terms of compression rate and depth.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23238423     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  9 in total

Review 1.  Randomized controlled trials of simulation-based interventions in Emergency Medicine: a methodological review.

Authors:  Anthony Chauvin; Jennifer Truchot; Aida Bafeta; Dominique Pateron; Patrick Plaisance; Youri Yordanov
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Adherence to AHA Guidelines When Adapted for Augmented Reality Glasses for Assisted Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Johan N Siebert; Frederic Ehrler; Alain Gervaix; Kevin Haddad; Laurence Lacroix; Philippe Schrurs; Ayhan Sahin; Christian Lovis; Sergio Manzano
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Evaluation of skills acquisition using a new low-cost tool for CPR self-training.

Authors:  Carla Sá-Couto; Ana Margarida Ferreira; Diana Almeida; Abel Nicolau; Pedro Vieira-Marques
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2018-07-03

4.  Real-Time Visual Feedback Device Improves Quality Of Chest Compressions: A Manikin Study.

Authors:  João B Augusto; Miguel B Santos; Daniel Faria; Paulo Alves; David Roque; José Morais; Victor Gil; Carlos Morais
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2020-07

5.  Virtual reality as a teaching method for resuscitation training in undergraduate first year medical students: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Malte Issleib; Alina Kromer; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Christoph Süss-Havemann; Jens C Kubitz
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Optimal Combination of Chest Compression Depth and Rate in Virtual Reality Resuscitation Training: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized Lowlands Saves Lives Trial.

Authors:  Joris Nas; Jos Thannhauser; Robert-Jan M van Geuns; Niels van Royen; Judith L Bonnes; Marc A Brouwer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Comparison of extended reality and conventional methods of basic life support training: protocol for a multinational, pragmatic, noninferiority, randomised clinical trial (XR BLS trial).

Authors:  Dong Keon Lee; Chang Woo Im; You Hwan Jo; Todd Chang; Joo Lee Song; Cindy Luu; Ralph Mackinnon; Suresh Pillai; Chuen Neng Lee; Sanghoon Jheon; Soyeon Ahn; Seung Hyun Won
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Clinical instructors' perceptions of virtual reality in health professionals' cardiopulmonary resuscitation education.

Authors:  Marie Ann Mae En Wong; Shien Chue; Michelle Jong; Ho Wye Kei Benny; Nabil Zary
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-09-17

9.  A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills.

Authors:  Chris Wilson; Erin Furness; Leah Proctor; Greg Sweetman; Kathryn Hird
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.