Literature DB >> 23238383

A novel approach for the resection of low rectal cancer.

Pan Hua-Feng1, Jiang Zhi-Wei, Wang Gang, Liu Xin-Xin, Liu Feng-Tao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our novel approach is a hybrid between cylindrical abdominoperineal resection and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). We report the clinical application of this technique and present preliminary data that shows this approach to be an effective tool for resection of low rectal cancer.
METHODS: Twenty patients with endoscopy-considered and biopsy-proven malignant lesions were required to undergo abdominal computed tomography examination for determining tumor stage. In addition, all patients had taken in digital rectal examination again on the surgery day. Perioperative management of patients was executed according to management of patients in fast-track surgery. First, cylindrical abdominoperineal resection was performed with the patients in the prone jackknife position to peritoneal reflection, then we turned the patients to the supine position and SILS was performed with the homemade single-port device.
RESULTS: The average distance from the anal verge was 2.60±1.14 cm and the mean tumor diameter confirmed by pathology measured to be 3.00±1.08 cm, and the circumferential margin was negative in all the specimens. The mean fabrication and set-up time of the homemade SILS device was 7.75±1.21 minutes and the average operating time was 138.55±9.32 minutes with minimal blood loss (20.5±5.83 mL). There were no conversions from SILS to conventional laparoscopy. On average, oral intake can often be successfully initiated 7.35±1.35 h after surgery, with the first passage of flatus from the colostomy occurring 2.55±0.76 d postoperation. Function hospital stay was 4.25±0.97 d with no undue sequelae. During the 6-month-long follow-up stage, no morbidity or mortality was observed except in 2 patients with poor union in perineum incision.
CONCLUSIONS: Cylindrical abdominoperineal decection combined with SILS is a feasible alternative for low rectal cancer, providing benefits like leaving enough exposure for operation, reducing trauma to surrounding organs, almost completely avoiding circumferential involvement, and allowing fast postoperative recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23238383     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826d67e4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  6 in total

1.  Dual-port laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection using the intended stoma site as the multichannel port.

Authors:  Takahisa Ishikawa; Shigenori Homma; Susumu Shibasaki; Tadashi Yoshida; Nozomi Minagawa; Hideki Kawamura; Norihiko Takahashi; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: an overview.

Authors:  Ketao Jin; Jun Wang; Huanrong Lan; Ruili Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

3.  Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for a tumor-specific mesorectal excision in patients with colorectal cancer: initial experience with 20 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Sung Uk Bae; Se Jin Baek; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; Hyuk Hur
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-02-28

4.  Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections.

Authors:  Yoen Tk van der Linden; Doeke Boersma; Koop Bosscha; Daniel J Lips; Hubert A Prins
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Comparison of single-port and conventional laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Nikolaj Nerup; Steffen Rosenstock; Orhan Bulut
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Single-access laparoscopic rectal surgery is technically feasible.

Authors:  Siripong Sirikurnpiboon; Paiboon Jivapaisarnpong
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-03-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.