Literature DB >> 23238338

Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production in China.

Sai Liang1, Ming Xu, Tianzhu Zhang.   

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate energy, economic, and environmental performances of seven categories of biodiesel feedstocks by using the mixed-unit input-output life cycle assessment method. Various feedstocks have different environmental performances, indicating potential environmental problem-shift. Jatropha seed, castor seed, waste cooking oil, and waste extraction oil are preferred feedstocks for biodiesel production in the short term. Positive net energy yields and positive net economic benefits of biodiesel from these four feedstocks are 2.3-52.0% of their life cycle energy demands and 74.1-448.4% of their economic costs, respectively. Algae are preferred in the long term mainly due to their less arable land demands. Special attention should be paid to potential environmental problems accompanying feedstock choice: freshwater use, ecotoxicity potentials, photochemical oxidation potential, acidification potential and eutrophication potential. Moreover, key processes are identified by sensitivity analysis to direct future technology improvements. Finally, supporting measures are proposed to optimize China's biodiesel development.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23238338     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  4 in total

1.  Mutagenicity emission factors of canola oil and waste vegetable oil biodiesel: Comparison to soy biodiesel.

Authors:  David M DeMarini; Esra Mutlu; Sarah H Warren; Charly King; M Ian Gilmour; William P Linak
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Manipulation of Auxin Response Factor 19 affects seed size in the woody perennial Jatropha curcas.

Authors:  Yanwei Sun; Chunming Wang; Ning Wang; Xiyuan Jiang; Huizhu Mao; Changxiang Zhu; Fujiang Wen; Xianghua Wang; Zhijun Lu; Genhua Yue; Zengfu Xu; Jian Ye
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparative analysis of carbon footprint between conventional smallholder operation and innovative largescale farming of urban agriculture in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yingjie Hu; Jin Sun; Ji Zheng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Utilization of over-ripened fruit (waste fruit) for the eco-friendly production of ethanol.

Authors:  Rishabh Chitranshi; Raj Kapoor
Journal:  Vegetos       Date:  2021-02-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.