Literature DB >> 23237921

Prediction of underestimated invasiveness in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on percutaneous biopsy as rationale for recommending concurrent sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sophie Schulz1, Peter Sinn, Michael Golatta, Geraldine Rauch, Hans Junkermann, Florian Schuetz, Christof Sohn, Joerg Heil.   

Abstract

AIM: To develop a model to predict invasion and improve the indication of concurrent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on minimally invasive biopsy.
METHODS: We evaluated the data of 205 patients with DCIS in minimally invasive biopsy specimens. Clinical, radiological and histological variables were assessed in order to identify predictors of invasive carcinoma in final pathology using logistic regression analyses. We developed and retrospectively tested an algorithm to indicate concurrent SLNB.
RESULTS: Invasiveness was underestimated in 18.0% (37 of 205). Univariate analysis revealed the following significant risk factors: lesion palpability, a mass lesion on ultrasound, the presence of a mammographically detectable mass, architectural distortion or density, a BI-RADS score of 5, a lesion diameter ≥50 mm, and ≥50% of histologically affected ducts. With a palpable mass, which remained the only independent predictor of invasion after multivariate adjustment, and the presence of at least three of the remaining five risk factors, the probability of invasion was 56.0%. If the prediction model had been used to indicate SLNB 9.8% (20 of 205) of patients could have been benefited (i.e. spared unnecessary or correctly recommended concurrent SLNB) compared to the factual performed SLNB procedures. Those patients with pure DCIS treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) benefited most with a relative risk reduction of nearly 50% for unnecessary SLNB.
CONCLUSION: The prediction model could rationally guide an informed discussion about risks and benefits of concurrent SLNB in patients with DCIS on minimally invasive biopsy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23237921     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  15 in total

1.  Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.

Authors:  Geunwon Kim; Peter G Mikhael; Tawakalitu O Oseni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prediction of invasive breast cancer using shear-wave elastography in patients with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Jae Seok Bae; Jung Min Chang; Su Hyun Lee; Sung Ui Shin; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Chinese experiences.

Authors:  Xiao Sun; Hao Li; Yan-Bing Liu; Zheng-Bo Zhou; Peng Chen; Tong Zhao; Chun-Jian Wang; Zhao-Peng Zhang; Peng-Fei Qiu; Yong-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Factors Associated With Underestimation of Invasive Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Precautions for Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Carlos Chavez de Paz Villanueva; Valentina Bonev; Maheswari Senthil; Naveenraj Solomon; Mark E Reeves; Carlos A Garberoglio; Jukes P Namm; Sharon S Lum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Prediction of Upstaging in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Based on Mammographic Radiomic Features.

Authors:  Rui Hou; Lars J Grimm; Maciej A Mazurowski; Jeffrey R Marks; Lorraine M King; Carlo C Maley; Thomas Lynch; Marja van Oirsouw; Keith Rogers; Nicholas Stone; Matthew Wallis; Jonas Teuwen; Jelle Wesseling; E Shelley Hwang; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 29.146

6.  Do Eligibility Criteria for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Active Surveillance Trials Identify Patients at Low Risk for Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?

Authors:  Tawakalitu O Oseni; Barbara L Smith; Constance D Lehman; Charmi A Vijapura; Niveditha Pinnamaneni; Manisha Bahl
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Preoperatively diagnosed ductal cancers in situ of the breast presenting as even small masses are of high risk for the invasive cancer foci in postoperative specimen.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Szynglarewicz; Piotr Kasprzak; Agnieszka Halon; Rafal Matkowski
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  A simple model to assess the probability of invasion in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast diagnosed by needle biopsy.

Authors:  Oldřich Coufal; Iveta Selingerová; Pavlína Vrtělová; Petr Krsička; Lucie Gabrielová; Pavel Fabian; Kateřina Stískalová; Monika Schneiderová; Alexandr Poprach; Ivan Justan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ found on stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications without mass: radiological-histological correlation.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Szynglarewicz; Piotr Kasprzak; Przemyslaw Biecek; Agnieszka Halon; Rafal Matkowski
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Development and evaluation of a prediction model for underestimated invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ at stereotactic large core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Suzanne C E Diepstraten; Stephanie M W Y van de Ven; Ruud M Pijnappel; Petra H M Peeters; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Helena M Verkooijen; Sjoerd G Elias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.