AIM: To develop a model to predict invasion and improve the indication of concurrent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on minimally invasive biopsy. METHODS: We evaluated the data of 205 patients with DCIS in minimally invasive biopsy specimens. Clinical, radiological and histological variables were assessed in order to identify predictors of invasive carcinoma in final pathology using logistic regression analyses. We developed and retrospectively tested an algorithm to indicate concurrent SLNB. RESULTS: Invasiveness was underestimated in 18.0% (37 of 205). Univariate analysis revealed the following significant risk factors: lesion palpability, a mass lesion on ultrasound, the presence of a mammographically detectable mass, architectural distortion or density, a BI-RADS score of 5, a lesion diameter ≥50 mm, and ≥50% of histologically affected ducts. With a palpable mass, which remained the only independent predictor of invasion after multivariate adjustment, and the presence of at least three of the remaining five risk factors, the probability of invasion was 56.0%. If the prediction model had been used to indicate SLNB 9.8% (20 of 205) of patients could have been benefited (i.e. spared unnecessary or correctly recommended concurrent SLNB) compared to the factual performed SLNB procedures. Those patients with pure DCIS treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) benefited most with a relative risk reduction of nearly 50% for unnecessary SLNB. CONCLUSION: The prediction model could rationally guide an informed discussion about risks and benefits of concurrent SLNB in patients with DCIS on minimally invasive biopsy.
AIM: To develop a model to predict invasion and improve the indication of concurrent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on minimally invasive biopsy. METHODS: We evaluated the data of 205 patients with DCIS in minimally invasive biopsy specimens. Clinical, radiological and histological variables were assessed in order to identify predictors of invasive carcinoma in final pathology using logistic regression analyses. We developed and retrospectively tested an algorithm to indicate concurrent SLNB. RESULTS: Invasiveness was underestimated in 18.0% (37 of 205). Univariate analysis revealed the following significant risk factors: lesion palpability, a mass lesion on ultrasound, the presence of a mammographically detectable mass, architectural distortion or density, a BI-RADS score of 5, a lesion diameter ≥50 mm, and ≥50% of histologically affected ducts. With a palpable mass, which remained the only independent predictor of invasion after multivariate adjustment, and the presence of at least three of the remaining five risk factors, the probability of invasion was 56.0%. If the prediction model had been used to indicate SLNB 9.8% (20 of 205) of patients could have been benefited (i.e. spared unnecessary or correctly recommended concurrent SLNB) compared to the factual performed SLNB procedures. Those patients with pure DCIS treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) benefited most with a relative risk reduction of nearly 50% for unnecessary SLNB. CONCLUSION: The prediction model could rationally guide an informed discussion about risks and benefits of concurrent SLNB in patients with DCIS on minimally invasive biopsy.
Authors: Carlos Chavez de Paz Villanueva; Valentina Bonev; Maheswari Senthil; Naveenraj Solomon; Mark E Reeves; Carlos A Garberoglio; Jukes P Namm; Sharon S Lum Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Rui Hou; Lars J Grimm; Maciej A Mazurowski; Jeffrey R Marks; Lorraine M King; Carlo C Maley; Thomas Lynch; Marja van Oirsouw; Keith Rogers; Nicholas Stone; Matthew Wallis; Jonas Teuwen; Jelle Wesseling; E Shelley Hwang; Joseph Y Lo Journal: Radiology Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: Tawakalitu O Oseni; Barbara L Smith; Constance D Lehman; Charmi A Vijapura; Niveditha Pinnamaneni; Manisha Bahl Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Oldřich Coufal; Iveta Selingerová; Pavlína Vrtělová; Petr Krsička; Lucie Gabrielová; Pavel Fabian; Kateřina Stískalová; Monika Schneiderová; Alexandr Poprach; Ivan Justan Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Suzanne C E Diepstraten; Stephanie M W Y van de Ven; Ruud M Pijnappel; Petra H M Peeters; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Helena M Verkooijen; Sjoerd G Elias Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 3.240