BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether dabigatran is as safe and effective as uninterrupted anticoagulation with warfarin during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of dabigatran by using a novel administration protocol and uninterrupted anticoagulation with warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing RFA of AF. METHODS: In this case-control analysis, 763 consecutive patients (mean age 61±10 years) underwent RFA of AF using dabigatran (N = 191) or uninterrupted warfarin (N = 572) for periprocedural anticoagulation. In all patients, anticoagulation was started≥4 weeks before RFA. Dabigatran was held after the morning dose on the day before the procedure and resumed 4 hours after vascular hemostasis was achieved. RESULTS: A transesophageal echocardiogram performed in all patients receiving dabigatran did not demonstrate an intracardiac thrombus. There were no thromboembolic complications in either group. The prevalence of major (4 of 191, 2.1%) and minor (5 of 191, 2.6%) bleeding complications in the dabigatran group were similar to those in the warfarin group (12 of 572, 2.1%; P = 1.0 and 19 of 572, 3.3%; P = .8, respectively). Pericardial tamponade occurred in 2 of 191 (1%) patients in the dabigatran group and in 7 of 572 (1.2%) patients in the warfarin group (P = 1.0). All patients who had a pericardial tamponade, including 2 in the dabigatran group, had uneventful recovery after perdicardiocentesis. On multivariate analysis, international normalized ratio (odds ratio [OR] 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-15.0; P = .04), clopidogrel use (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.5-12.3; P = .01), and CHA2DS2-VASc score (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8; P = .01) were the independent risk factors of bleeding complications only in the warfarin group. CONCLUSIONS: When held for approximately 24 hours before the procedure and resumed 4 hours after vascular hemostasis, dabigatran appears to be as safe and effective as uninterrupted warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing RFA of AF.
BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether dabigatran is as safe and effective as uninterrupted anticoagulation with warfarin during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of dabigatran by using a novel administration protocol and uninterrupted anticoagulation with warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing RFA of AF. METHODS: In this case-control analysis, 763 consecutive patients (mean age 61±10 years) underwent RFA of AF using dabigatran (N = 191) or uninterrupted warfarin (N = 572) for periprocedural anticoagulation. In all patients, anticoagulation was started≥4 weeks before RFA. Dabigatran was held after the morning dose on the day before the procedure and resumed 4 hours after vascular hemostasis was achieved. RESULTS: A transesophageal echocardiogram performed in all patients receiving dabigatran did not demonstrate an intracardiac thrombus. There were no thromboembolic complications in either group. The prevalence of major (4 of 191, 2.1%) and minor (5 of 191, 2.6%) bleeding complications in the dabigatran group were similar to those in the warfarin group (12 of 572, 2.1%; P = 1.0 and 19 of 572, 3.3%; P = .8, respectively). Pericardial tamponade occurred in 2 of 191 (1%) patients in the dabigatran group and in 7 of 572 (1.2%) patients in the warfarin group (P = 1.0). All patients who had a pericardial tamponade, including 2 in the dabigatran group, had uneventful recovery after perdicardiocentesis. On multivariate analysis, international normalized ratio (odds ratio [OR] 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-15.0; P = .04), clopidogrel use (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.5-12.3; P = .01), and CHA2DS2-VASc score (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8; P = .01) were the independent risk factors of bleeding complications only in the warfarin group. CONCLUSIONS: When held for approximately 24 hours before the procedure and resumed 4 hours after vascular hemostasis, dabigatran appears to be as safe and effective as uninterrupted warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing RFA of AF.
Authors: Benjamin A Steinberg; Vic Hasselblad; Brett D Atwater; Tristram D Bahnson; Jeffrey B Washam; John H Alexander; James P Daubert; Jonathan P Piccini Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Melanie Gunawardene; S Willems; B Schäffer; J Moser; R Ö Akbulak; M Jularic; C Eickholt; J Nührich; C Meyer; P Kuklik; S Sehner; V Czerner; B A Hoffmann Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2018-11-27