Literature DB >> 23237679

The risk of carotid artery stenting compared with carotid endarterectomy is greatest in patients treated within 7 days of symptoms.

Barbara Rantner1, Georg Goebel, Leo H Bonati, Peter A Ringleb, Jean-Louis Mas, Gustav Fraedrich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Among patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, carotid artery stenting (CAS) is associated with a higher risk of periprocedural stroke or death than carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Uncertainty remains whether the balance of risk changes with time since the most recent ischemic event.
METHODS: We investigated the association of time between the qualifying ischemic event and treatment (0-7 days, 8-14 days, and >14 days) with the risk of stroke or death within 30 days after CAS or CEA in a pooled analysis of data from individual patients randomized in the Endarterectomy vs Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial, the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) trial, and the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Data were analyzed with a fixed-effect binomial regression model adjusted for source trial.
RESULTS: Information on time of qualifying event was available for 2839 patients. In the first 30 days after intervention, any stroke or death occurred significantly more often in the CAS group (110/1434 [7.7%]) compared with the CEA group (54/1405 [3.8%]; crude risk ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.7). Patients undergoing CEA within the first 7 days of the qualifying event had the lowest periprocedural stroke or death rate (3/106 [2.8%]). Patients treated with CAS in the same period had a 9.4% risk of periprocedural stroke or death (13/138; risk ratio CAS vs CEA: 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-11.8; adjusted for age, sex, and type of qualifying event). Patients treated between 8 and 14 days showed a periprocedural stroke or death rate of 3.4% (7/208) and 8.1% (19/234), respectively, for CEA and CAS. The latest treatment group had 4% complications in the CEA group (44/1091) and 7.3% in the CAS group (78/1062).
CONCLUSIONS: The increase in risk of CAS compared with CEA appears to be greatest in patients treated within 7 days of symptoms. Early surgery might remain most effective in stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23237679     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  18 in total

1.  Demographic and Technical Risk Factors of 30-Day Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and/or Death in Standard- and High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.

Authors:  Afshin Borhani Haghighi; Samaneh Yousefi; Ehsan Bahramali; Safoora Kokabi; Seyed Taghi Heydari; Abdolhamid Shariat; Alireza Nikseresht; Nahid Ashjazadeh; Sadegh Izadi; Peyman Petramfar; Maryam Poursadegh; Abbas Rahimi Jaberi; Sajjad Emami; Hamid Agheli; Reza Nemati; Ehsan Yaghoubi; Mohammad Hosein Abdi; Majid Panahandeh; Moslem Heydari; Anahid Safari; Marziyeh Basir; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Randal Edgell
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-07

2.  [Neurology and carotid artery interventions. What has to be done first?].

Authors:  T Reiff; P A Ringleb
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Management of transient ischemic attack or nondisabling stroke related to extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Varun Kapila; Prasad Jetty; Vincenzo S Basile; Luc Dubois
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Interventions for Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Update.

Authors:  Josephine F Huang; James F Meschia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-05

5.  Associations of Perioperative Variables With the 30-Day Risk of Stroke or Death in Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Christoph Knappich; Andreas Kuehnl; Bernhard Haller; Michael Salvermoser; Ale Algra; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Leo H Bonati; Richard Bulbulia; David Calvet; Gustav Fraedrich; John Gregson; Alison Halliday; Jeroen Hendrikse; George Howard; Olav Jansen; Mahmoud B Malas; Peter A Ringleb; Martin M Brown; Jean-Louis Mas; Thomas G Brott; Dylan R Morris; Steff C Lewis; Hans-Henning Eckstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Outcome of carotid artery stenting in the hands of vascular surgeons.

Authors:  Carola Marie Wieker; S Demirel; N Attigah; M Hakimi; U Hinz; D Böckler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Carotid Revascularization: Current Practice and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jacob H Bagley; Ryan Priest
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Effects of timing on in-hospital and one-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization.

Authors:  Christina L Cui; Hanaa Dakour-Aridi; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Marc L Schermerhorn; Jeffrey J Siracuse; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Stroke due to large vessel atherosclerosis: Five new things.

Authors:  Erika Marulanda-Londoño; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2016-06

Review 10.  Immediate versus delayed treatment for recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nicolle Cassola; Edina Mk da Silva; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.