| Literature DB >> 23237559 |
Tamara Alpermann1, Wolfgang Kern, Susanne Schnittger, Christoph Schmid, Karl-Anton Kreuzer, Hubert Serve, Hermann Josef Pielken, Norbert Schmitz, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Claudia Haferlach, Torsten Haferlach.
Abstract
Recommendations for classification in AML have been published by the European Leukemia Network (ELN). We evaluated these recommendations within an independent cohort of 954 adult de novo AML patients. No differences in outcome for subgroups intermediate I versus II were found. Therefore we renewed the reporting system and defined the subgroups as follows: favorable (CBF leukemias, or intermediate cytogenetics with NPM1mutation (mut) or biallelic CEBPAmut), intermediate I (intermediate cytogenetics), intermediate II (intermediate cytogenetics and at least one of the following: MLL-PTD, RUNX1mut, FLT3-ITD/wt ratio ≥ 0.5), and adverse (adverse cytogenetics). Significant differences in outcomes between all four subgroups were found.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23237559 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.11.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Res ISSN: 0145-2126 Impact factor: 3.156