Literature DB >> 23237356

Dietician-delivered intensive nutritional support is associated with a decrease in severe postoperative complications after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer.

G C Ligthart-Melis1, P J M Weijs, N D te Boveldt, S Buskermolen, C P Earthman, H M W Verheul, E S M de Lange-de Klerk, S J B van Weyenberg, D L van der Peet.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietician-delivered intensive nutritional support (INS) on postoperative outcome in patients with esophageal cancer. Approximately 50-80% of patients with esophageal cancer are malnourished at the time of diagnosis. Malnutrition enhances the risk of postoperative complications, resulting in delay of postoperative recovery and impairment of quality of life. Sixty-five patients with esophageal cancer were included. All patients who received surgery (n = 28) in the time frame between March 2009 and April 2010, the first year after the start of INS, were included in the INS intervention group. The control group (n = 37) consisted of patients who received surgery during the 3 years before the start of INS. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare differences in severity of postoperative complications using the Dindo classification. Linear regression was applied to evaluate differences in preoperative weight change. The adjusted odds ratio for developing serious complications after surgery of INS compared with the control group was 0.23 (95% confidence interval: 0.053-0.97; P = 0.045). Benefit was mainly observed in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy (n = 35). The INS program furthermore resulted in a relative preoperative weight gain in comparison with the control group of +4.8% (P = 0.009, adjusted) in these neoadjuvant-treated patients. This study shows that dietician-delivered INS preserves preoperative weight and decreases severe postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; dietician; esophageal cancer; nutrition; surgery; weight loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23237356     DOI: 10.1111/dote.12008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of the prognostic values of various nutritional parameters in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from Southern China.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Fei Zhang; Cui Chen; Xin An; Yu-Hong Li; Feng-Hua Wang; Zhi-Hua Zhu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Strategies to reduce pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Teus J Weijs; Jelle P Ruurda; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Misha D P Luyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Recent progress in perioperative management of patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Masayuki Watanabe; Akihiko Okamura; Tasuku Toihata; Kotaro Yamashita; Masami Yuda; Masaru Hayami; Ian Fukudome; Yu Imamura; Shinji Mine
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.230

Review 4.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  [Impact of perioperative nutritional therapy on risk and complication management in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer].

Authors:  A Weimann; I Gockel; A H Hölscher; H-J Meyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Esophageal cancer management controversies: Radiation oncology point of view.

Authors:  Patricia Tai; Edward Yu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-08-15

7.  Analysis on nutritional risk screening and influencing factors of hospitalized patients in central urban area.

Authors:  Su-Yun Li; Jiao-Hua Yu; Zhao-Feng Diao; Li Zeng; Min-Jie Zeng; Xiao-Fang Shen; Lin Zhang; Wen-Jia Shi; Hui Ke; Huan Wang; Xian-Na Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 8.  Cachexia in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Poorna Anandavadivelan; Pernilla Lagergren
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Different strategy of salvage esophagectomy between residual and recurrent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yusuke Taniyama; Tadashi Sakurai; Takahiro Heishi; Hiroshi Okamoto; Chiaki Sato; Shota Maruyama; Yu Onodera; Hirotaka Ishida; Michiaki Unno; Takashi Kamei
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Perioperative Predictive Markers for Recurrence of Esophageal Cancer after Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yoshinori Fujiwara; Masaharu Higashida; Hisako Kubota; Yuko Okamoto; Shumei Mineta; Shunji Endo; Tomio Ueno
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2021-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.