Literature DB >> 23237226

The evolutionary ecology of dwarfism in three-spined sticklebacks.

Andrew D C MacColl1, Aliya El Nagar, Job de Roij.   

Abstract

1. Body size is a defining phenotypic trait, but the ecological causes of its evolution are poorly understood. Most studies have considered only a single putative causal agent and have failed to recognise that different environmental agents are often correlated. 2. Darwin suggested that although trait variation across populations is often associated with abiotic variation, evolution is more likely to be driven by biotic factors correlated with the abiotic variation. This hypothesis has received little explicit attention. 3. We use structural equation modelling to quantify the relative importance of abiotic (pH, metal concentrations) and biotic (competition, predation) factors in the evolution of body size in three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus on the island of North Uist, Scotland. We combine phenotypic data from multiple isolated populations, detailed characterisation of their environment and a common garden experiment that establishes the genetic basis of size differences. 4. Three-spined sticklebacks on North Uist show almost unprecedented intraspecific evolution of body size that has taken place rapidly (<16,000 years). The smallest fish mature at only 7% of the mass of ancestral, anadromous fish. Dwarfism is associated with reduced abundance of a smaller competitor species, the nine-spined stickleback Pungitius pungitius, and with low pH indicative of poor resource conditions. Dwarfism also tends to occur where an important predator, the brown trout Salmo trutta, is also small. The abundance of P. pungitius and the size of S. trutta are themselves related to underlying abiotic environmental variation. 5. Despite the close association between abiotic and biotic factors across populations, our results support Darwin's hypothesis that biotic factors, associated with variation in the abiotic environment, are more important in explaining evolution than is abiotic variation per se. This study demonstrates the importance of considering the relationships between environmental variables before conclusions can be drawn about the causes of (body size) evolution on islands.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  O matrix; calcium; island rule; nanism; selective agent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23237226     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  6 in total

1.  The role of calcium and predation on plate morph evolution in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Carl Smith; Rowena Spence; Iain Barber; Mirosław Przybylski; Robert J Wootton
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Inappropriate analysis does not reveal the ecological causes of evolution of stickleback armour: a critique of Spence et al. 2013.

Authors:  Andrew D C MacColl; Beth Aucott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Variation in age and size in Fennoscandian three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Jacquelin DeFaveri; Juha Merilä
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Parasites contribute to ecologically dependent postmating isolation in the adaptive radiation of three-spined stickleback.

Authors:  Aliya El Nagar; Andrew D C MacColl
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Measuring the immune system of the three-spined stickleback - investigating natural variation by quantifying immune expression in the laboratory and the wild.

Authors:  Shaun Robertson; Janette E Bradley; Andrew D C MacColl
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  The ecology of an adaptive radiation of three-spined stickleback from North Uist, Scotland.

Authors:  Isabel S Magalhaes; Daniele D'Agostino; Paul A Hohenlohe; Andrew D C MacColl
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.185

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.