Jimi Adams1, James Moody, Martina Morris. 1. School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA. jadams@american.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined how risk behaviors differentially connect a population at high risk for sexually transmitted infections. METHODS: Starting from observed networks representing the full risk network and the risk network among respondents only, we constructed a series of edge-deleted counterfactual networks that selectively remove sex ties, drug ties, and ties involving both sex and drugs and a comparison random set. With these edge-deleted networks, we have demonstrated how each tie type differentially contributes to the connectivity of the observed networks on a series of standard network connectivity measures (component and bicomponent size, distance, and transitivity ratio) and the observed network racial segregation. RESULTS: Sex ties are unique from the other tie types in the network, providing wider reach in the network in relatively nonredundant ways. In this population, sex ties are more likely to bridge races than are other tie types. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions derived from only 1 mode of transmission at a time (e.g., condom promotion or needle exchange) would have different potential for curtailing sexually transmitted infection spread through the population than would attempts that simultaneously address all risk-relevant behaviors.
OBJECTIVES: We examined how risk behaviors differentially connect a population at high risk for sexually transmitted infections. METHODS: Starting from observed networks representing the full risk network and the risk network among respondents only, we constructed a series of edge-deleted counterfactual networks that selectively remove sex ties, drug ties, and ties involving both sex and drugs and a comparison random set. With these edge-deleted networks, we have demonstrated how each tie type differentially contributes to the connectivity of the observed networks on a series of standard network connectivity measures (component and bicomponent size, distance, and transitivity ratio) and the observed network racial segregation. RESULTS: Sex ties are unique from the other tie types in the network, providing wider reach in the network in relatively nonredundant ways. In this population, sex ties are more likely to bridge races than are other tie types. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions derived from only 1 mode of transmission at a time (e.g., condom promotion or needle exchange) would have different potential for curtailing sexually transmitted infection spread through the population than would attempts that simultaneously address all risk-relevant behaviors.
Authors: J J Potterat; S Q Muth; R B Rothenberg; H Zimmerman-Rogers; D L Green; J E Taylor; M S Bonney; H A White Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: D E Woodhouse; R B Rothenberg; J J Potterat; W W Darrow; S Q Muth; A S Klovdahl; H P Zimmerman; H L Rogers; T S Maldonado; J B Muth Journal: AIDS Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Daniel J Feaster; Carrigan L Parish; Lauren Gooden; Tim Matheson; Pedro C Castellon; Rui Duan; Yue Pan; Louise F Haynes; Bruce R Schackman; C Kevin Malotte; Raul N Mandler; Grant N Colfax; Lisa R Metsch Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Andrea K Knittel; Jacqueline E Rudolph; Bonnie E Shook-Sa; Andrew Edmonds; Catalina Ramirez; Mardge Cohen; Tonya Taylor; Adebola Adedimeji; Katherine G Michel; Joel Milam; Jennifer Cohen; Jessica D Donohue; Antonina Foster; Margaret A Fischl; Dustin M Long; Adaora A Adimora Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Susan J Little; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Christy M Anderson; Jason A Young; Joel O Wertheim; Sanjay R Mehta; Susanne May; Davey M Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240