Literature DB >> 23237137

Comparative efficacy of 2 zotarolimus-eluting stent generations: resolute versus endeavor stents in patients with coronary artery disease.

Tomohisa Tada1, Robert A Byrne, Salvatore Cassese, Lamin King, Stefanie Schulz, Julinda Mehilli, Albert Schömig, Adnan Kastrati.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) utilizes the same metallic platform and anti-restenotic drug as the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) but is coated with a more biocompatible polymer with enhanced drug-release kinetics. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of 2 zotarolimus-eluting stent generations.
METHODS: In two randomized trials with broad inclusion criteria (ISAR-TEST 2 and ISAR-TEST 5), 1,000 patients were treated with R-ZES and 339 patients treated with E-ZES. In both trials follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 to 8 months. The efficacy endpoint of interest was target lesion revascularization and the safety endpoints were the combined incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction related to target vessel as well as the incidence of definite stent thrombosis at 2-year follow-up.
RESULTS: The incidence of target lesion revascularization at 2 years was 12.0% in the R-ZES group and 16.0% in the E-ZES (HR 0.72 [95% CI: 0.52-1.00], P = .052). The incidence of cardiac death or myocardial infarction was 5.5% vs. 4.8% (HR 1.15, [95% CI: 0.66-2.02], P = .62) and of definite stent thrombosis was 0.4% vs. 0.6% (HR 0.68, [95% CI: 0.12-3.72], P = .66), respectively. All measures of angiographic restenosis were in favor of the R-ZES; in-stent late lumen loss was 0.29 ± 0.56 with the R-ZES versus 0.58 ± 0.55 with the E-ZES (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the 2 Food and Drug Administration-approved zotarolimus-eluting stents suggested that the R-ZES as compared to the E-ZES displayed overall superior antirestenotic efficacy. Both devices were associated with a similar low risk of adverse safety events through 2 years.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23237137     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

Review 1.  Drug-eluting stents: the past, present, and future.

Authors:  Gregory Katz; Bhisham Harchandani; Binita Shah
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Long-term comparative effectiveness of Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in New York.

Authors:  Feng Qian; Ye Zhong; Edward L Hannan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Three-year major clinical outcomes of phosphorylcholine polymer- vs biolinx polymer-zotarolimus-eluting stents: A propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Yong Hoon Kim; Ae-Young Her; Seung-Woon Rha; Byoung Geol Choi; Se Yeon Choi; Jae Kyeong Byun; Yoonjee Park; Dong Oh Kang; Won Young Jang; Woohyeun Kim; Woong Gil Choi; Tae Soo Kang; Jihun Ahn; Sang-Ho Park; Ji Young Park; Min-Ho Lee; Cheol Ung Choi; Chang Gyu Park; Hong Seog Seo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Drug-Eluting Stents and Balloons-Materials, Structure Designs, and Coating Techniques: A Review.

Authors:  I Rykowska; I Nowak; R Nowak
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Drug-eluting stents for acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lishan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Safety and efficacy outcomes of first and second generation durable polymer drug eluting stents and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents in clinical practice: comprehensive network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eliano P Navarese; Kenneth Tandjung; Bimmer Claessen; Felicita Andreotti; Mariusz Kowalewski; David E Kandzari; Dean J Kereiakes; Ron Waksman; Laura Mauri; Ian T Meredith; Aloke V Finn; Hyo-Soo Kim; Jacek Kubica; Harry Suryapranata; Toni Mustahsani Aprami; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Clemens von Birgelen; Elvin Kedhi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-11-06

7.  Safety and Efficacy of the Endeavor Resolute® Stent in Patients with Multivessel Disease: The HEART (Honam EndeAvor ResoluTe) Prospective, Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Doo Sun Sim; Myung Ho Jeong; Young Joon Hong; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Keun Ho Park; Sun Ho Hwang; Dong Goo Kang; Seung Uk Lee; Joon Woo Kim; Jong Pil Park; Jay Young Rhew; Sang Rok Lee; Jei Keon Chae; Kyeong Ho Yun; Seok Kyu Oh; Won You Kang; Su Hyun Kim; Jang Hyun Cho
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2018-01-25

8.  Comparison of the Major Clinical Outcomes for the Use of Endeavor® and Resolute Integrity® Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents During a Three-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Yong Hoon Kim; Ae-Young Her; Seung-Woon Rha; Byoung Geol Choi; Se Yeon Choi; Jae Kyeong Byun; Yoonjee Park; Dong Oh Kang; Won Young Jang; Woohyeun Kim; Cheol Ung Choi; Chang Gyu Park; Hong Seog Seo
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2020-02-06

9.  High Bleeding Risk Patients Treated with Very Thin-Strut Biodegradable Polymer or Thin-Strut Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in the BIO-RESORT Trial.

Authors:  Paolo Zocca; Marlies M Kok; Liefke C van der Heijden; Peter W Danse; Carl E Schotborgh; Martijn Scholte; Marc Hartmann; Gerard C M Linssen; Carine J M Doggen; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.727

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.