Literature DB >> 23236979

Journey in evolution of nuclear cardiology: will there be another quantum leap with the F-18-labeled myocardial perfusion tracers?

Vasken Dilsizian1, Raymond Taillefer.   

Abstract

The field of nuclear cardiac imaging has evolved from being rather subjective, more "art than a science," to a more objective, digital-based quantitative technique, providing insight into the physiological processes of cardiovascular disorders and predicting patient outcome. In a mere 4 decades of its clinical use, the technology used to image myocardial perfusion has made quantum leaps from planar to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and now to a more contemporary rapid SPECT, positron emission tomography (PET), and hybrid SPECT-computed tomography (CT) and PET-CT techniques. Meanwhile, radiotracers have flourished from potassium-43 and red blood cell-tagged blood pool imaging to thallium-201 and technetium-99m-labeled SPECT perfusion tracers along with rubidium-82, ammonia N-13, and more recently F-18 fluorine-labeled PET perfusion tracers. Concurrent with this expansion is the introduction of new quantitative methods and software for image processing, evaluation, and data interpretation. Technical advances, particularly in obtaining quantitative data, have led to a better understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying cardiovascular diseases beyond discrete epicardial coronary artery disease to coronary vasomotor function in the early stages of the development of coronary atherosclerosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Progress in the areas of molecular and hybrid imaging are equally important areas of growth in nuclear cardiology. However, this paper focuses on the past and future of nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging and particularly perfusion tracers.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23236979     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  22 in total

Review 1.  Serious and potentially life threatening complications of cardiac stress testing: Physiological mechanisms and management strategies.

Authors:  Vasken Dilsizian; Henry Gewirtz; Nicholas Paivanas; Anastasia N Kitsiou; Fadi G Hage; Nathan E Crone; Ronald G Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Quantification of PET Myocardial Blood Flow.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Patrick Martineau; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Responsible growth of nuclear cardiology in Spain.

Authors:  Maria João Ferreira; Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) with positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT): clinical impact in diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Ziadi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

5.  Transition from SPECT to PET myocardial perfusion imaging: A desirable change in nuclear cardiology to approach perfection.

Authors:  Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Cardiac molecular imaging to track left ventricular remodeling in heart failure.

Authors:  Jamshid Shirani; Amitoj Singh; Sahil Agrawal; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Novel molecular angiotensin converting enzyme and angiotensin receptor imaging techniques.

Authors:  Jamshid Shirani; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Exploring the Pathophysiology of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Wengen Chen; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Prevalence, location, and extent of significant coronary artery disease in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Shu Yokota; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Mohamed Mouden; Jorik R Timmer; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Ran Heo; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.