UNLABELLED: High-grade gliomas have a dismal prognosis, and prognostic factors are needed to optimize treatment algorithms. In this study we identified clinical prognostic factors as well as the prognostic value of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) status in a population-based group of patients with high-grade gliomas. Using the Danish Cancer Registry and the Danish Pathology Databank we identified 359 patients: 234 had WHO grade IV gliomas, 58 had WHO grade III gliomas, and 67 were diagnosed clinically. Mutated IDH1 was predominantly observed in oligodendroglial tumors (WHO grade III). Patients with mutated IDH1 had a significantly better outcome than patients with wildtype IDH1: 2-year OS 59% and 18%, respectively (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.68). However, when adjusting for other prognostic factors, IDH1 status was not a significant independent prognostic factor (HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.32-1.07). Young age, absence of neurological deficit, performance status 0-1, tumor not crossing the midline, and receiving post-surgical treatment were significant independent indicators of a good prognosis in multivariate analysis. IN CONCLUSION: This population-based study could not demonstrate IDH1 status to be an independent prognostic factor in high-grade gliomas when adjusting for the effect of classic prognostic factors.
UNLABELLED: High-grade gliomas have a dismal prognosis, and prognostic factors are needed to optimize treatment algorithms. In this study we identified clinical prognostic factors as well as the prognostic value of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) status in a population-based group of patients with high-grade gliomas. Using the Danish Cancer Registry and the Danish Pathology Databank we identified 359 patients: 234 had WHO grade IV gliomas, 58 had WHO grade III gliomas, and 67 were diagnosed clinically. Mutated IDH1 was predominantly observed in oligodendroglial tumors (WHO grade III). Patients with mutated IDH1 had a significantly better outcome than patients with wildtype IDH1: 2-year OS 59% and 18%, respectively (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.68). However, when adjusting for other prognostic factors, IDH1 status was not a significant independent prognostic factor (HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.32-1.07). Young age, absence of neurological deficit, performance status 0-1, tumor not crossing the midline, and receiving post-surgical treatment were significant independent indicators of a good prognosis in multivariate analysis. IN CONCLUSION: This population-based study could not demonstrate IDH1 status to be an independent prognostic factor in high-grade gliomas when adjusting for the effect of classic prognostic factors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Glioblastoma; high-grade gliomas; isocitrate dehydrogenase 1(IDH1); population characteristics; prognosis
Authors: M Lacroix; D Abi-Said; D R Fourney; Z L Gokaslan; W Shi; F DeMonte; F F Lang; I E McCutcheon; S J Hassenbusch; E Holland; K Hess; C Michael; D Miller; R Sawaya Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David N Louis; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Webster K Cavenee; Peter C Burger; Anne Jouvet; Bernd W Scheithauer; Paul Kleihues Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Rikke H Dahlrot; Steinbjørn Hansen; Stine S Jensen; Henrik D Schrøder; Jacob Hjelmborg; Bjarne W Kristensen Journal: Int J Clin Exp Pathol Date: 2014-06-15
Authors: Rikke H Dahlrot; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jørn Herrstedt; Henrik D Schrøder; Jacob Hjelmborg; Bjarne W Kristensen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Rikke H Dahlrot; Pia Larsen; Henning B Boldt; Melissa S Kreutzfeldt; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jacob B Hjelmborg; Bjarne Winther Kristensen Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Justin D Lathia; Meizhang Li; Maksim Sinyuk; Alvaro G Alvarado; William A Flavahan; Kevin Stoltz; Ann Mari Rosager; James Hale; Masahiro Hitomi; Joseph Gallagher; Qiulian Wu; Jody Martin; Jason G Vidal; Ichiro Nakano; Rikke H Dahlrot; Steinbjørn Hansen; Roger E McLendon; Andrew E Sloan; Shideng Bao; Anita B Hjelmeland; Christian T Carson; Ulhas P Naik; Bjarne Kristensen; Jeremy N Rich Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 9.423