| Literature DB >> 23236371 |
Jonathan Stieglitz1, Aaron D Blackwell, Raúl Quispe Gutierrez, Edhitt Cortez Linares, Michael Gurven, Hillard Kaplan.
Abstract
Sexual risk-taking and reproductive morbidity are common among rapidly modernizing populations with little material wealth, limited schooling, minimal access to modern contraception and healthcare, and gendered inequalities in resource access that limit female autonomy in cohabiting relationships. Few studies have examined how modernization influences sexual risk-taking and reproductive health early in demographic transition. Tsimane are a natural fertility population of Bolivian forager-farmers; they are not urbanized, reside in small-scale villages, and lack public health infrastructure. We test whether modernization is associated with greater sexual risk-taking, report prevalence of gynecological morbidity (GM), and test whether modernization, sexual risk-taking and parity are associated with greater risk of GM. Data were collected from 2002-2010 using interviews, clinical exams, and laboratory analysis of cervical cells. We find opposing effects of modernization on both sexual risk-taking and risk of GM. Residential proximity to town and Spanish fluency are associated with greater likelihood of men's infidelity, and with number of lifetime sexual partners for men and women. However, for women, literacy is associated with delayed sexual debut after controlling for town proximity. Fifty-five percent of women present at least one clinical indicator of GM (n = 377); 48% present inflammation of cervical cells, and in 11% the inflammation results from sexually transmitted infection (trichomoniasis). Despite having easier access to modern healthcare, women residing near town experience greater likelihood of cervical inflammation and trichomoniasis relative to women in remote villages; women who are fluent in Spanish are also more likely to present trichomoniasis relative to women with moderate or no fluency. However, literate women experience lower likelihood of trichomoniasis. Parity has no effect on risk of GM. Our results suggest a net increase in risk of reproductive morbidity among rapidly modernizing, resource-stressed populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23236371 PMCID: PMC3516519 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050384
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
GEE analysis of effect of town proximity on likelihood of husband’s infidelity, controlling for wife’s age, presence of children
| Parameter | B | SE | p | OR |
| Intercept | 2.471 | 0.403 | <0.001 | |
| Proximity to town = close (ref: remote) | 0.524 | 0.262 | 0.045 | 1.69 |
| Wife’s age (years) | −0.082 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.921 |
| Children present (ref: absent) | −0.944 | 0.195 | <0.001 | 0.389 |
| Respondent sex = female | 1.911 | 0.264 | <0.001 | 6.76 |
Figure 1Probability of husband’s infidelity by town proximity and wife’s age.
Control variables in table 1 set to sample means (sample min. and max. for wife’s age = 12 and 77, respectively).
Figure 2Mean (±SE) number of husband’s other partners (n = 173, controlling for age and age at marriage with a town proximity-by-Spanish fluency interaction term).
Parameter estimates from OLS regressions of effects of town proximity, Spanish fluency, and literacy on sexual risk-taking.
| Dependent variable | Model | Distance toSan Borja(per 10 km) | Distance to Yucumo(per 10 km) | Distance to Rurre(per 10 km) | Husband fluent | Husbandliterate | Wifefluent | Wifeliterate |
| Husband’s # lifetime partners | Ind | −0.08 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.64 | 0.29 | –– | –– |
| STEP | −0.05t | 0.60 | –– | –– | ||||
| Wife’s age at first intercourse | Ind | 0.01 | −0.10 | −0.07 | –– | –– | 0.58 | 0.98 |
| STEP | –– | –– | 0.84 | |||||
| Wife’s # lifetime partners | Ind | −0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 | –– | –– | 0.29 | 0.32t |
| STEP | −0.05 | –– | –– | 0.26 |
Models are adjusted for age.
p≤0.001;
p≤0.01;
p≤0.05; t p≤0.15.
Wife’s report.
Each parameter was evaluated independently (Ind), controlling for age. Starting from a full model, parameters were removed in a stepwise fashion until all parameters were significant at p≤0.10 (STEP). To estimate effects on number of lifetime partners (for husband and wife), age at marriage was not controlled as inclusion of this term reduced the effective sample size substantially (given missing data); on a sub-sample where data were available, inclusion of an age at marriage term does not significantly affect results.
Figure 3Geographical distribution of risk factors for GM.
Distribution of wife’s age at first intercourse and number of lifetime partners for both spouses are based on the GM sample and weighted to adjust for sample bias (see text). To calculate mean risk, wife’s age at first intercourse and number of lifetime partners for both spouses were converted to z-scores and averaged, with age at first intercourse reverse coded. Distribution of Spanish fluency and literacy are based on the sample of women that received medical exams. Circles represent location of study villages, and circle size indicates number of women sampled per village. Estimates are derived from generalized additive models controlling for age. Regions between villages are simulated by the model. Refer to Supplementary Material for geographical distribution without sample weights (figure S3).
Prevalence of GM from: A) gynecological exams and B) PAP tests.
| % women presenting at least once | |
|
| |
| Any GM (421 | 55 |
| Vaginitis (476) | 51 |
| Abnormal discharge (476) | 25 |
| Pelvic pain (433 | 18 |
| Dyspareunia (476) | 16 |
| Genital itching (476) | 12 |
| Genital ulcer (426 | 3 |
|
| |
| Any inflammation (467 | 48 |
|
| |
| Bacterial (464) | 35 |
| Trichomonal (464) | 11 |
| Fungal (464) | 2 |
Sample size varies due to non-systematic missing data.
Three women with inflammation of unknown etiology were omitted. The PAP test of one woman revealed inflammation of multiple etiologies (bacterial/trichomonal) and was included.
Figure 4Geographical distribution of GM from PAP tests.
Circles represent location of study villages, and circle size indicates relative sample size. Estimates are derived from generalized additive models controlling for age and weighted to adjust for sample bias (see text). Regions between villages are simulated by the model. Refer to Supplementary Material for geographical distribution of gynecological exams (figure S4), and geographical distribution of GM without sample weights (figure S5).
Odds ratios (ORs) from GEE analyses of effects of sexual risk-taking, town proximity, and wife’s Spanish fluency and literacy on likelihood of GM.
| Dependent variable | Model | Husband’s #lifetime partners | Wife’s age at firstintercourse | Wife’s # lifetime partners | Distance toSan Borja(per 10 km) | Distance to Yucumo(per 10 km) | Distance toRurre(per 10 km) | Wife fluent | Wife literate |
|
| |||||||||
| Any GM | Ind | 1.48 | 0.89 | 1.33 | 0.90t | 1.03 | 0.92 | 1.22 | 1.43 |
| STEP | 0.90 | ||||||||
| Vaginitis | Ind | 1.67t | 0.85t | 1.49 | 0.91t | 1.04 | 0.93 | 1.42 | 1.62 |
| STEP | 0.85t | 1.42 | 0.90t | ||||||
| Abnormal discharge | Ind | 1.88 | 0.94 | 1.26 | 1.05 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.55 |
| STEP | 2.24 | 1.12 | 0.81t | ||||||
| Pelvic pain | Ind | 2.73 | 1.09 | 0.91 | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.02 | 0.70 | 0.45 |
| STEP | 2.68 | ||||||||
| Dyspareunia | Ind | 1.58 | 1.08 | 1.17 | 1.15 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.36 | 0.23 |
| STEP | 1.59 | 1.15t | 0.24 | ||||||
| Genital itching | Ind | 2.60 | 1.24 | 1.40t | 1.11 | 1.02 | 1.04 | 0.59 | 0.51 |
| STEP | 3.38 | 1.38 | 1.51t | 0.25t | |||||
| Genital ulcer | Ind | 0.26 | 1.06 | 0.42t | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.45 | –– |
| STEP | 0.05 | 0.62 | 24.31 | –– | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| Any inflammation | Ind | 1.34 | 1.04 | 1.16 | 0.84 | 1.11 | 0.95 | 1.35 | 1.31 |
| STEP | 0.82 | 1.18t | |||||||
| Etiology | |||||||||
| Bacterial | Ind | 1.74t | 1.09 | 1.27t | 0.79 | 1.30 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 1.28 |
| STEP | 0.75 | 1.36 | |||||||
| Trichomonal | Ind | 0.51 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 1.11 | 0.70 | 1.09 | 2.85t | 0.96 |
| STEP | 0.27 | 0.73 | 1.36t | 8.93 | 0.04 | ||||
| Fungal | Ind | 5.27 | 1.43 | 0.30 | 1.23t | 0.68t | 1.07 | 3.03 | –– |
| STEP | 9.63 | 0.22 | 2.28 | –– |
Models are weighted to adjust for sample bias (see text). OR’s are adjusted for age. Refer to table S1 for ORs from unweighted models.
p≤0.001;
p≤0.01;
p≤0.05; t p≤0.10.
Each parameter was evaluated independently (Ind), controlling for age and age2 if applicable. Starting from a full model, parameters were removed in a stepwise fashion until all parameters were significant at p≤0.10 (STEP).
Wife’s report; due to skewed distribution and potential for reporting error, husband’s number of partners was coded as: ≤2, >2, or missing. Values represent OR for >2.
vs. ≤2. We cannot test whether husband’s infidelity is associated with greater likelihood of GM due to non-overlapping datasets.
No literate woman presented genital ulcer or inflammatory PAP of fungal etiology.