Literature DB >> 23236164

DNA regions bound at low occupancy by transcription factors do not drive patterned reporter gene expression in Drosophila.

William W Fisher1, Jingyi Jessica Li, Ann S Hammonds, James B Brown, Barret D Pfeiffer, Richard Weiszmann, Stewart MacArthur, Sean Thomas, John A Stamatoyannopoulos, Michael B Eisen, Peter J Bickel, Mark D Biggin, Susan E Celniker.   

Abstract

In animals, each sequence-specific transcription factor typically binds to thousands of genomic regions in vivo. Our previous studies of 20 transcription factors show that most genomic regions bound at high levels in Drosophila blastoderm embryos are known or probable functional targets, but genomic regions occupied only at low levels have characteristics suggesting that most are not involved in the cis-regulation of transcription. Here we use transgenic reporter gene assays to directly test the transcriptional activity of 104 genomic regions bound at different levels by the 20 transcription factors. Fifteen genomic regions were selected based solely on the DNA occupancy level of the transcription factor Kruppel. Five of the six most highly bound regions drive blastoderm patterns of reporter transcription. In contrast, only one of the nine lowly bound regions drives transcription at this stage and four of them are not detectably active at any stage of embryogenesis. A larger set of 89 genomic regions chosen using criteria designed to identify functional cis-regulatory regions supports the same trend: genomic regions occupied at high levels by transcription factors in vivo drive patterned gene expression, whereas those occupied only at lower levels mostly do not. These results support studies that indicate that the high cellular concentrations of sequence-specific transcription factors drive extensive, low-occupancy, nonfunctional interactions within the accessible portions of the genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23236164      PMCID: PMC3535648          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1209589110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  How perfect can protein interactomes be?

Authors:  Emmanuel D Levy; Christian R Landry; Stephen W Michnick
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  Combinatorial binding predicts spatio-temporal cis-regulatory activity.

Authors:  Robert P Zinzen; Charles Girardot; Julien Gagneur; Martina Braun; Eileen E M Furlong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Coassembly of REST and its cofactors at sites of gene repression in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Hong-Bing Yu; Rory Johnson; Galih Kunarso; Lawrence W Stanton
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Genome-wide MyoD binding in skeletal muscle cells: a potential for broad cellular reprogramming.

Authors:  Yi Cao; Zizhen Yao; Deepayan Sarkar; Michael Lawrence; Gilson J Sanchez; Maura H Parker; Kyle L MacQuarrie; Jerry Davison; Martin T Morgan; Walter L Ruzzo; Robert C Gentleman; Stephen J Tapscott
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 12.270

5.  Different gene regulation strategies revealed by analysis of binding motifs.

Authors:  Zeba Wunderlich; Leonid A Mirny
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Quantitative models of the mechanisms that control genome-wide patterns of transcription factor binding during early Drosophila development.

Authors:  Tommy Kaplan; Xiao-Yong Li; Peter J Sabo; Sean Thomas; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Mark D Biggin; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Genome-wide and phase-specific DNA-binding rhythms of BMAL1 control circadian output functions in mouse liver.

Authors:  Guillaume Rey; François Cesbron; Jacques Rougemont; Hans Reinke; Michael Brunner; Felix Naef
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  What does biologically meaningful mean? A perspective on gene regulatory network validation.

Authors:  Albertha J M Walhout
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  The role of chromatin accessibility in directing the widespread, overlapping patterns of Drosophila transcription factor binding.

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Li; Sean Thomas; Peter J Sabo; Michael B Eisen; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Mark D Biggin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions.

Authors:  Stewart MacArthur; Xiao-Yong Li; Jingyi Li; James B Brown; Hou Cheng Chu; Lucy Zeng; Brandi P Grondona; Aaron Hechmer; Lisa Simirenko; Soile V E Keränen; David W Knowles; Mark Stapleton; Peter Bickel; Mark D Biggin; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  78 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic mechanisms and developmental choice hierarchies in T-lymphocyte development.

Authors:  Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 2.  Beyond the ENCODE project: using genomics and epigenomics strategies to study enhancer evolution.

Authors:  Noboru Jo Sakabe; Marcelo A Nobrega
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Evolution of transcriptional enhancers and animal diversity.

Authors:  Marcelo Rubinstein; Flávio S J de Souza
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Low-affinity transcription factor binding sites shape morphogen responses and enhancer evolution.

Authors:  Andrea I Ramos; Scott Barolo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Inducible protein traps with dominant phenotypes for functional analysis of the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Swetha Singari; Naureen Javeed; Nicholas J Tardi; Suresh Marada; Jeff C Carlson; Steven Kirk; Judith M Thorn; Kevin A Edwards
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Causal Gene Regulatory Network Modeling and Genomics: Second-Generation Challenges.

Authors:  Ellen V Rothenberg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 7.  Regulation of transcription factors via natural decoys in genomic DNA.

Authors:  Catherine A Kemme; Dan Nguyen; Abhijnan Chattopadhyay; Junji Iwahara
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2016-07-06

Review 8.  Characterization of noncoding regulatory DNA in the human genome.

Authors:  Ran Elkon; Reuven Agami
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  The Drosophila melanogaster tribbles pseudokinase is necessary for proper memory formation.

Authors:  Holly LaFerriere; Troy Zars
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 10.  Using the ENCODE Resource for Functional Annotation of Genetic Variants.

Authors:  Michael J Pazin
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2015-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.