Gerhard Prenner1. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Jodrell Laboratory, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The inflorescence structure determines the spatiotemporal arrangement of the flowers during anthesis and is therefore vital for reproductive success. The Leguminosae are among the largest angiosperm plant families and they include some important crop plants. In papilionoid legumes, the raceme is the most common type of inflorescence. However, a range of other inflorescence types have evolved via various developmental processes. A (re-)investigation of inflorescences in Swainsona formosa, Cicer arietinum, Abrus precatorius, Hardenbergia violacea and Kennedia nigricans leads to new insights into reduction mechanisms and to a new hypothesis on the evolution of the papilionoid pseudoraceme. METHODS: Inflorescence morphology and ontogeny were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). KEY RESULTS: The inflorescence in S. formosa is an umbel with a rare type of pendulum symmetry which may be triggered by the subtending leaf. Inflorescences in C. arietinum are reduced to a single flower. An early formed adaxial bulge is the sterile apex of the inflorescence (i.e. the inflorescence is open and not terminated by a flower). In partial inflorescences of A. precatorius, the axis is reduced and its meristem is relocated towards the main inflorescence. Flower initiation follows a peculiar pendulum pattern. Partial inflorescences in H. violacea and in K. nigricans show reduction tendencies. In both taxa, initiated but early reduced bracteoles are present. CONCLUSIONS: Pendulum symmetry in S. formosa is probably associated with distichous phyllotaxis. In C. arietinum, strong reduction tendencies are revealed. Based on studies of A. precatorius, the papilionoid pseudoraceme is reinterpreted as a compound raceme with condensed lateral axes. From an Abrus-like inflorescence, other types can be derived via reduction of flower number and synchronization of flower development. A plea is made for uniform usage of inflorescence terminology.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The inflorescence structure determines the spatiotemporal arrangement of the flowers during anthesis and is therefore vital for reproductive success. The Leguminosae are among the largest angiosperm plant families and they include some important crop plants. In papilionoid legumes, the raceme is the most common type of inflorescence. However, a range of other inflorescence types have evolved via various developmental processes. A (re-)investigation of inflorescences in Swainsona formosa, Cicer arietinum, Abrus precatorius, Hardenbergia violacea and Kennedia nigricans leads to new insights into reduction mechanisms and to a new hypothesis on the evolution of the papilionoid pseudoraceme. METHODS: Inflorescence morphology and ontogeny were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). KEY RESULTS: The inflorescence in S. formosa is an umbel with a rare type of pendulum symmetry which may be triggered by the subtending leaf. Inflorescences in C. arietinum are reduced to a single flower. An early formed adaxial bulge is the sterile apex of the inflorescence (i.e. the inflorescence is open and not terminated by a flower). In partial inflorescences of A. precatorius, the axis is reduced and its meristem is relocated towards the main inflorescence. Flower initiation follows a peculiar pendulum pattern. Partial inflorescences in H. violacea and in K. nigricans show reduction tendencies. In both taxa, initiated but early reduced bracteoles are present. CONCLUSIONS: Pendulum symmetry in S. formosa is probably associated with distichous phyllotaxis. In C. arietinum, strong reduction tendencies are revealed. Based on studies of A. precatorius, the papilionoid pseudoraceme is reinterpreted as a compound raceme with condensed lateral axes. From an Abrus-like inflorescence, other types can be derived via reduction of flower number and synchronization of flower development. A plea is made for uniform usage of inflorescence terminology.
Authors: James W Horn; Benjamin W van Ee; Jeffery J Morawetz; Ricarda Riina; Victor W Steinmann; Paul E Berry; Kenneth J Wurdack Journal: Mol Phylogenet Evol Date: 2012-01-21 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: Dmitry D Sokoloff; Margarita V Remizowa; Matthew D Barrett; John G Conran; Paula J Rudall Journal: Am J Bot Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 3.844
Authors: Cristina Caballo; Ana Berbel; Raúl Ortega; Juan Gil; Teresa Millán; Josefa Rubio; Francisco Madueño Journal: New Phytol Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 10.323
Authors: Kester Bull-Hereñu; Patricia Dos Santos; João Felipe Ginefra Toni; Juliana Hanna Leite El Ottra; Pakkapol Thaowetsuwan; Julius Jeiter; Louis Philippe Ronse De Craene; Akitoshi Iwamoto Journal: Plants (Basel) Date: 2022-02-28