BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pancreatic head resection is performed with low mortality, but morbidity remains high. Extensive preparation, long operating times, intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusions are risk factors for postoperative morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the ultrasonic dissection device in pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy (PPPD). METHODS:Fifty consecutive patients who underwent PPPD with anultrasonic dissection device (group 1) were compared with a match-controlled group of 50 consecutive patients who underwentPPPD with conventional dissection techniques (group 2). Duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, blood units, complications, mortality and duration of hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gender or BMI between groups. In group 1, mean blood loss (446 ± 281.8 ml, p = 0.008) and number of blood units (0.32 ± 0.86, p = 0.001) were significantly lower than in group 2 (819 ± 915.4 ml; 1.36 ± 2.83 units). Duration of surgery was shorter in group 1 (345.6 vs. 373 min, p = 0.28). The rate of postoperative complications, mortality and hospital stay were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an ultrasonic dissection device in PPPD might significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusions. These results should be verified in a prospective randomized controlled trial.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pancreatic head resection is performed with low mortality, but morbidity remains high. Extensive preparation, long operating times, intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusions are risk factors for postoperative morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the ultrasonic dissection device in pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy (PPPD). METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients who underwent PPPD with an ultrasonic dissection device (group 1) were compared with a match-controlled group of 50 consecutive patients who underwent PPPD with conventional dissection techniques (group 2). Duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, blood units, complications, mortality and duration of hospital stay were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gender or BMI between groups. In group 1, mean blood loss (446 ± 281.8 ml, p = 0.008) and number of blood units (0.32 ± 0.86, p = 0.001) were significantly lower than in group 2 (819 ± 915.4 ml; 1.36 ± 2.83 units). Duration of surgery was shorter in group 1 (345.6 vs. 373 min, p = 0.28). The rate of postoperative complications, mortality and hospital stay were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an ultrasonic dissection device in PPPD might significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusions. These results should be verified in a prospective randomized controlled trial.