Literature DB >> 23233602

How to use new biology to guide therapy in multiple myeloma.

Gareth J Morgan1, Martin F Kaiser.   

Abstract

Recent advances in multiple myeloma (MM) therapy have led to significantly longer median survival rates and some patients being cured. At the same time, our understanding of MM biology and the molecular mechanisms driving the disease is constantly improving. Next-generation sequencing technologies now allow insights into the genetic aberrations in MM at a genome-wide scale and across different developmental stages in the course of an individual tumor. This improved knowledge about MM biology needs to be rapidly translated and transformed into diagnostic and therapeutic applications to finally achieve cure in a larger proportion of patients. As a part of these translational efforts, novel drugs that inhibit oncogenic proteins overexpressed in defined molecular subgroups of the disease, such as FGFR3 and MMSET in t(4;14) MM, are currently being developed. The potential of targeted next-generation diagnostic tests to rapidly identify clinically relevant molecular subgroups is being evaluated. The technical tools to detect and define tumor subclones may potentially become clinically relevant because intraclonal tumor heterogeneity has become apparent in many cancers. The emergence of different MM subclones under the selective pressure of treatment is important in MM, especially in the context of maintenance therapy and treatment for asymptomatic stages of the disease. Finally, novel diagnostic and therapeutic achievements have to be implemented into innovative clinical trial strategies with smaller trials for molecularly defined high-risk patients and large trials with a long follow-up for the patients most profiting from the current treatment protocols. These combined approaches will hopefully transform the current one-for-all care into a more tailored, individual therapeutic strategy for MM patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233602     DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program        ISSN: 1520-4383


  10 in total

1.  Progressive changes in chromatin structure and DNA damage response signals in bone marrow and peripheral blood during myelomagenesis.

Authors:  M Gkotzamanidou; E Terpos; C Bamia; S A Kyrtopoulos; P P Sfikakis; M A Dimopoulos; V L Souliotis
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Integrative network modeling approaches to personalized cancer medicine.

Authors:  Brian A Kidd; Ben P Readhead; Caroline Eden; Samir Parekh; Joel T Dudley
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 3.  Emerging options in multiple myeloma: targeted, immune, and epigenetic therapies.

Authors:  Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 4.  The role of pre-transplant induction regimens and autologous stem cell transplantation in the era of novel targeted agents.

Authors:  Francesca Gay; Federica Cavallo; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Opposite activation of the Hedgehog pathway in CD138+ plasma cells and CD138-CD19+ B cells identifies two subgroups of patients with multiple myeloma and different prognosis.

Authors:  M Martello; D Remondini; E Borsi; B Santacroce; M Procacci; A Pezzi; F A Dico; G Martinelli; E Zamagni; P Tacchetti; L Pantani; N Testoni; G Marzocchi; S Rocchi; B A Zannetti; K Mancuso; M Cavo; C Terragna
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Targeting paraprotein biosynthesis for non-invasive characterization of myeloma biology.

Authors:  Katharina Lückerath; Constantin Lapa; Annika Spahmann; Gerhard Jörg; Samuel Samnick; Andreas Rosenwald; Herrmann Einsele; Stefan Knop; Andreas K Buck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Promises and Pitfalls in the Use of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Stefania Oliva; Rossella Troia; Mattia D'Agostino; Mario Boccadoro; Francesca Gay
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Pharmacovigilance of patients with multiple myeloma being treated with bortezomib and/or thalidomide.

Authors:  T B M Castro; A E Hallack Neto; A Atalla; L C Ribeiro
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.590

9.  Transplant-Ineligible Symptomatic but Indolent Multiple Myeloma Shows Better Prognosis with Conventional Agents.

Authors:  Aya Nakaya; Shinya Fujita; Atsushi Satake; Takahisa Nakanishi; Yoshiko Azuma; Yukie Tsubokura; Akiko Konishi; Masaaki Hotta; Hideaki Yoshimura; Kazuyoshi Ishii; Tomoki Ito; Shosaku Nomura
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2017-10-05

10.  The Glasgow Prognostic Score at Diagnosis Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Hanno M Witte; Bastian Bonorden; Armin Riecke; Harald Biersack; Konrad Steinestel; Hartmut Merz; Alfred C Feller; Veronica Bernard; Sebastian Fetscher; Nikolas von Bubnoff; Niklas Gebauer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.