Literature DB >> 23233566

A look into the future: can minimal residual disease guide therapy and predict prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Paolo Ghia1.   

Abstract

Over the past 2 decades, dramatic improvements in the efficacy of treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia have led to progressively higher percentages of clinical complete remissions. A molecular eradication of the leukemia has become not only a desirable, but also an achievable, end point that needs to be evaluated within clinical trials. The assessment of complete remission only at the clinical and morphological level is insufficient, at least for physically fit patients. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia has become feasible using PCR-based or flow cytometric techniques that reproducibly allow reaching the detection level of less than 1 leukemic cell per 10 000 leukocytes (10(-4)), the level currently defined as MRD(-) status. Emerging data indicate that the MRD status during and at the end of treatment is one of the most powerful predictors of progression-free and overall survival. This predictor appears to be independent of clinical response, type or line of therapy, and known biological markers. For these reasons, the time is ripe to test the use of MRD as a surrogate marker of clinical end points and as a real-time marker of efficacy and/or resistance to the administered therapies. In the near future, clinical trials will determine whether MRD assessment can be used for guiding therapy, either to improve quality of responses through consolidation or to prevent relapses through preemptive therapies based on the reappearance of MRD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233566     DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program        ISSN: 1520-4383


  5 in total

1.  The prognostic impact of minimal residual disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia requiring first-line therapy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Santacruz; Neus Villamor; Marta Aymerich; Alejandra Martínez-Trillos; Cristina López; Alba Navarro; María Rozman; Sílvia Beà; Cristina Royo; Maite Cazorla; Dolors Colomer; Eva Giné; Magda Pinyol; Xose S Puente; Carlos López-Otín; Elías Campo; Armando López-Guillermo; Julio Delgado
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Dual-action CXCR4-targeting liposomes in leukemia: function blocking and drug delivery.

Authors:  Catriona McCallion; Anna D Peters; Andrew Booth; Karen Rees-Unwin; Julie Adams; Raisa Rahi; Alain Pluen; Claire V Hutchinson; Simon J Webb; John Burthem
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-07-23

Review 3.  Personalized medicine in CLL: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Uri Rozovski; Inbal Hazan-Halevy; Michael J Keating; Zeev Estrov
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: recommendations from the Brazilian Group of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Celso Arrais Rodrigues; Matheus Vescovi Gonçalves; Maura Rosane Valério Ikoma; Irene Lorand-Metze; André Domingues Pereira; Danielle Leão Cordeiro de Farias; Maria de Lourdes Lopes Ferrari Chauffaille; Rony Schaffel; Eduardo Flávio Oliveira Ribeiro; Talita Silveira da Rocha; Valeria Buccheri; Yuri Vasconcelos; Vera Lúcia de Piratininga Figueiredo; Carlos Sérgio Chiattone; Mihoko Yamamoto
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2016-08-20

Review 5.  The Minimal Residual Disease Using Liquid Biopsies in Hematological Malignancies.

Authors:  Rafael Colmenares; Noemí Álvarez; Santiago Barrio; Joaquín Martínez-López; Rosa Ayala
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.