Literature DB >> 23233280

Mammal hip morphology and function: coxa recta and coxa rotunda.

Heinse W Bouma1, Stefan F De Boer, John De Vos, Paulien M Van Kampen, Tom Hogervorst.   

Abstract

Using 15 parameters, we provide a systematic description of mammal proximal femoral morphology. We established two types of proximal femoral morphology, termed coxa recta and coxa rotunda, characterized by low versus high concavity of the head-neck junction. Concavity is a measure of the sphericity of the femoral head as it meets the femoral neck that can be quantified by angular measurements. We asked whether the parameter of concavity corresponds with the classification of mammal proximal femoral morphology based on coalesced versus separate ossification patterns and locomotor patterns. Statistical analysis demonstrated a distinction between coxa recta and coxa rotunda with significant differences between the two groups in all but 3 of the 15 parameters examined. We found the most discriminating measurement between mammal hips to be the concavity of the posterior head-neck junction (beta angle). Coxa recta (small concavity) and coxa rotunda (large concavity) relate to the ossification pattern seen in proximal femoral development, and species-specific patterns of locomotion. We interpret the two hip types to reflect optimization for strength (recta) versus mobility (rotunda). Conceptually, both hip types can be recognized in humans, where coxa recta can be related to the development of osteoarthritis.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233280     DOI: 10.1002/ar.22634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  3 in total

1.  Comparative morphology and scaling of the femur in yangochiropteran bats.

Authors:  Nathália Siqueira Veríssimo Louzada; Marcelo Rodrigues Nogueira; Leila Maria Pessôa
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-06-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  What ape proximal femora tell us about femoroacetabular impingement: a comparison.

Authors:  Joost T Fikkers; Heinse W Bouma; Stefan F de Boer; Paul A Toogood; Paulien M van Kampen; Tom Hogervorst
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Evolution of the human hip. Part 1: the osseous framework.

Authors:  Tom Hogervorst; Evie E Vereecke
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2014-10-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.