Akram Al-Ibraheem 1 , Andreas K Buck , Matthias R Benz , Maximilian Rudert , Ambros J Beer , Asem Mansour , Kelsey L Pomykala , Bernhard Haller , Hendrik Juenger , Klemens Scheidhauer , Markus Schwaiger , Ken Herrmann Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of modern hybrid imaging modalities for detecting recurrent bone or soft tissue sarcoma remains to be determined. In this report, the authors present a clinical study on the diagnostic accuracy and incremental value of integrated (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18) F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with a history of sarcoma who have clinically suspected disease recurrence. METHODS: Forty-three patients who had a history of bone or soft tissue sarcoma and had documented complete remission underwent (18) F-FDG PET/CT. Image analysis was performed independently for (18) F-FDG PET (n = 43) and for contrast-enhanced spiral CT (CE-CT) (n = 30) by 2 separate readers, whereas combined (18) F-FDG PET/CT (n = 43) images were analyzed in consensus by both readers. Imaging findings were rated on a 5-point scale and finally were reported as malignant, benign, or equivocal. Imaging findings were validated either by histopathology (n = 24) or by clinical follow-up (n = 19). RESULTS: (18) F-FDG PET/CT had greater sensitivity and specificity compared with CE-CT alone (94% and 92% vs 78% and 67%, respectively), resulting in significantly greater accuracy (93% vs 73%; P = .03). (18) F-FDG PET/CT was particularly superior regarding detection of local recurrence or soft tissue lesions (sensitivity and specificity: 83% and 100% vs 50% and 100%, respectively) or bone metastases (100% and 100% vs 85% and 88%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: (18) F-FDG PET/CT had greater diagnostic accuracy in the detection of recurrent bone or soft tissue sarcoma compared with CE-CT alone. The detection of local recurrence was the most evident advantage of (18) F-FDG PET/CT over CE-CT. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of modern hybrid imaging modalities for detecting recurrent bone or soft tissue sarcoma remains to be determined. In this report, the authors present a clinical study on the diagnostic accuracy and incremental value of integrated (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18) F-FDG PET/CT ) in patients with a history of sarcoma who have clinically suspected disease recurrence. METHODS: Forty-three patients who had a history of bone or soft tissue sarcoma and had documented complete remission underwent (18) F-FDG PET/CT . Image analysis was performed independently for (18) F-FDG PET (n = 43) and for contrast-enhanced spiral CT (CE-CT ) (n = 30) by 2 separate readers, whereas combined (18) F-FDG PET/CT (n = 43) images were analyzed in consensus by both readers. Imaging findings were rated on a 5-point scale and finally were reported as malignant, benign, or equivocal. Imaging findings were validated either by histopathology (n = 24) or by clinical follow-up (n = 19). RESULTS: (18) F-FDG PET/CT had greater sensitivity and specificity compared with CE-CT alone (94% and 92% vs 78% and 67%, respectively), resulting in significantly greater accuracy (93% vs 73%; P = .03). (18) F-FDG PET/CT was particularly superior regarding detection of local recurrence or soft tissue lesions (sensitivity and specificity: 83% and 100% vs 50% and 100%, respectively) or bone metastases (100% and 100% vs 85% and 88%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: (18) F-FDG PET/CT had greater diagnostic accuracy in the detection of recurrent bone or soft tissue sarcoma compared with CE-CT alone. The detection of local recurrence was the most evident advantage of (18) F-FDG PET/CT over CE-CT . Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Mesh： See more »
Substances： See more »
Year: 2012
PMID： 23233156 DOI： 10.1002/cncr.27866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer ISSN： 0008-543X Impact factor: 6.860