Literature DB >> 23233052

Biochemical cardiovascular risk factors after hypertensive pregnancy disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wietske Hermes1, Johannes C F Ket, Maria G van Pampus, Arie Franx, Marjolein V E Veenendaal, Clara Kolster, Jouke T Tamsma, Kitty W M Bloemenkamp, Gabrielle Ponjee, Evelien van der Hout, Hilde Ten Horn, Stéphanie Loix, Ben Willem Mol, Christianne J M de Groot.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing biochemical cardiovascular risk factors in women with previous hypertensive pregnancy disorders and women with previous normotensive pregnancies. Data were collected from PubMed and EMBASE (from inception to February 28, 2011) supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies. Included were cohort studies and case-control studies assessing biochemical cardiovascular risk factors in women with previous hypertensive pregnancy disorders compared with women with previous normotensive pregnancies. Of 2573 studies reviewed for eligibility, quality, and data extraction, 22 were included in the review, of which 15 could be meta-analyzed. The pooled mean differences for the outcomes of interest were 0.17 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.25 mmol/L) for glucose (10 studies), 3.46 mU/mL (95% CI, 2.34-4.58 mU/mL) for insulin (5 studies), 0.13 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.05-0.21) for triglycerides (10 studies), 0.22 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.11-0.33 mmol/L) for total cholesterol (11 studies), -0.11 mmol/L (95% CI, -0.18 to -0.04 mmol/L) for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (10 studies), and 0.21 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.10-0.32) for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (9 studies), all in the disadvantage in women with previous hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Analyses for preeclampsia alone showed similar results. CONTINUED LEARNING
OBJECTIVES: After completing this CME activity, physicians should be better able to assess the long-term cardiovascular consequences after hypertensive pregnancy disorders, evaluate and interpret the evidence regarding biochemical cardiovascular risk factor assessment after pregnancy, and counsel women with a history of hypertensive pregnancy disorders as to the effectiveness of cardiovascular risk factor assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with previous hypertensive pregnancy disorders have higher glucose, insulin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels measured after pregnancy compared with women with previous normotensive pregnancies. These biochemical cardiovascular risk factors may identify women who will benefit from primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23233052     DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31827682fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv        ISSN: 0029-7828            Impact factor:   2.347


  17 in total

Review 1.  Abnormal Placentation Associated with Infertility as a Marker of Overall Health.

Authors:  Lauren W Sundheimer; Margareta D Pisarska
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 2.  Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Across Races and Ethnicities: A Review.

Authors:  Renée J Burger; Hannelore Delagrange; Irene G M van Valkengoed; Christianne J M de Groot; Bert-Jan H van den Born; Sanne J Gordijn; Wessel Ganzevoort
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Cardiovascular risk factors one year after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy.

Authors:  Deborah B Ehrenthal; Stephanie Rogers; Neal D Goldstein; David G Edwards; William S Weintraub
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Risk factors of hypertensive disorders among Chinese pregnant women.

Authors:  Rong Hu; Ying-Xue Li; Hai-Hong Di; Zhi-Wei Li; Chun-Hua Zhang; Xian-Ping Shen; Jun-Feng Zhu; Wei-Rong Yan
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-16

Review 5.  Sex differences in cardiovascular disease - Impact on care and outcomes.

Authors:  K H Humphries; M Izadnegahdar; T Sedlak; J Saw; N Johnston; K Schenck-Gustafsson; R U Shah; V Regitz-Zagrosek; J Grewal; V Vaccarino; J Wei; C N Bairey Merz
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 8.333

6.  Subsequent risk of metabolic syndrome in women with a history of preeclampsia: data from the Health Examinees Study.

Authors:  Jae Jeong Yang; Sang-Ah Lee; Ji-Yeob Choi; Minkyo Song; Sohee Han; Hyung-Suk Yoon; Yunhee Lee; Juhwan Oh; Jong-Koo Lee; Daehee Kang
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.211

7.  Cardiovascular RiskprofilE - IMaging and gender-specific disOrders (CREw-IMAGO): rationale and design of a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Gerbrand A Zoet; Cindy Meun; Laura Benschop; Eric Boersma; Ricardo P J Budde; Bart C J M Fauser; Christianne J M de Groot; Aad van der Lugt; Angela H E M Maas; Karl G M Moons; Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Eric A P Steegers; Bas B van Rijn; Joop S E Laven; Arie Franx; Birgitta K Velthuis
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 8.  Shared biomarkers between female diastolic heart failure and pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa J Alma; Anouk Bokslag; Angela H E M Maas; Arie Franx; Walter J Paulus; Christianne J M de Groot
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-01-30

9.  Advice on healthy pregnancy, delivery, motherhood and information on non-communicable diseases in the maternal care programme in Myanmar: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sumiyo Okawa; Hla Hla Win; Keiko Nanishi; Akira Shibanuma; Phyu Phyu Aye; Thu Nandar Saw; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Life Course Trajectories of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Women With and Without Hypertensive Disorders in First Pregnancy: The HUNT Study in Norway.

Authors:  Eirin B Haug; Julie Horn; Amanda R Markovitz; Abigail Fraser; Lars J Vatten; Corrie Macdonald-Wallis; Kate Tilling; Pål R Romundstad; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Bjørn O Åsvold
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.