UNLABELLED: We wondered if the inverse changes in airway conductance (Gaw) and functional residual capacity (FRC) during histamine (H) and acetylcholine (ACH) challenge are interrelated or occur at random. In 14 normal and 14 asthmatic subjects, we determined FRC and Gaw changes corresponding to changes in specific airway conductance (SGaw) around -40 percent produced by an aerosol of H or ACH inhaled quantitatively and with measured lung deposition. We also assessed the elastic recoil following H inhalation (5A). We found that in 11 normal and nine asthmatic subjects, after H or nine normal and 11 asthmatic subjects after ACH, Gaw and 1/FRC were linearly and directly related (p less than 0.05). The steepness of this slope was directly related to the resting Gaw values. A similar relation was uncovered in the literature for asthmatic patients at rest or during recovery from natural asthma. As the elastic recoil was normal and did not change after H, it could not explain delta FRC at delta SGaw of -40 percent. IN CONCLUSION: (1) during H or ACH challenge, Gaw-FRC relationship in normal or asthmatic subjects tends to be hyperbolic and dependent on resting Gaw; (2) such a relationship is seemingly present in other bronchoconstrictor responses with a different pathogenesis; and (3) during bronchoconstriction, as Gaw vs FRC is no longer linear, SGaw becomes volume dependent.
UNLABELLED: We wondered if the inverse changes in airway conductance (Gaw) and functional residual capacity (FRC) during histamine (H) and acetylcholine (ACH) challenge are interrelated or occur at random. In 14 normal and 14 asthmatic subjects, we determined FRC and Gaw changes corresponding to changes in specific airway conductance (SGaw) around -40 percent produced by an aerosol of H or ACH inhaled quantitatively and with measured lung deposition. We also assessed the elastic recoil following H inhalation (5A). We found that in 11 normal and nine asthmatic subjects, after H or nine normal and 11 asthmatic subjects after ACH, Gaw and 1/FRC were linearly and directly related (p less than 0.05). The steepness of this slope was directly related to the resting Gaw values. A similar relation was uncovered in the literature for asthmatic patients at rest or during recovery from natural asthma. As the elastic recoil was normal and did not change after H, it could not explain delta FRC at delta SGaw of -40 percent. IN CONCLUSION: (1) during H or ACH challenge, Gaw-FRC relationship in normal or asthmatic subjects tends to be hyperbolic and dependent on resting Gaw; (2) such a relationship is seemingly present in other bronchoconstrictor responses with a different pathogenesis; and (3) during bronchoconstriction, as Gaw vs FRC is no longer linear, SGaw becomes volume dependent.