OBJECTIVES: To determine whether percutaneous tenotomy of the Achilles tendon in infants with idiopathic clubfeet can be safely performed under propofol sedation. BACKGROUND: Many orthopaedic surgeons prefer to do a tenotomy under general anesthesia. At our institution, we have been using 2 different methods of induction and maintenance of anesthesia: one method using combined propofol and sevoflurane and various types of airway management, and the other using only propofol with facemask. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients less than 1 year of age with idiopathic clubfoot who underwent a percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy under anesthesia. Collected data included: chronological age, earlier apneic events, medical risk factors, time from operating room entry to surgery, and surgical-related and anesthesia-related complications. RESULTS: The study group comprised 114 patients who underwent 162 tenotomies. Sixty-five patients were in group 1 (sevoflurane/propofol) and 49 patients were in group 2 (propofol). The 2 groups did not differ with respect to sex, bilaterality, chronological age, number of preterm infants, ASA class, or associated risk factors. The average time from operating room entry to surgery was approximately 5 minutes longer with group 1, which included 14 cases taking longer than 20 minutes. However, there were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy in infants with idiopathic clubfeet may be safely performed under anesthesia. Propofol sedation was safe and effective without the need for airway instrumentation for this short procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (retrospective).
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether percutaneous tenotomy of the Achilles tendon in infants with idiopathic clubfeet can be safely performed under propofol sedation. BACKGROUND: Many orthopaedic surgeons prefer to do a tenotomy under general anesthesia. At our institution, we have been using 2 different methods of induction and maintenance of anesthesia: one method using combined propofol and sevoflurane and various types of airway management, and the other using only propofol with facemask. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients less than 1 year of age with idiopathic clubfoot who underwent a percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy under anesthesia. Collected data included: chronological age, earlier apneic events, medical risk factors, time from operating room entry to surgery, and surgical-related and anesthesia-related complications. RESULTS: The study group comprised 114 patients who underwent 162 tenotomies. Sixty-five patients were in group 1 (sevoflurane/propofol) and 49 patients were in group 2 (propofol). The 2 groups did not differ with respect to sex, bilaterality, chronological age, number of preterm infants, ASA class, or associated risk factors. The average time from operating room entry to surgery was approximately 5 minutes longer with group 1, which included 14 cases taking longer than 20 minutes. However, there were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous tendoachilles tenotomy in infants with idiopathic clubfeet may be safely performed under anesthesia. Propofol sedation was safe and effective without the need for airway instrumentation for this short procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (retrospective).
Authors: Ümit Tuhanioğlu; Hasan U Oğur; Fırat Seyfettinoğlu; Hakan Çiçek; Volkan T Tekbaş; Ahmet Kapukaya Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 2.359