OBJECTIVE: To assess the robustness of socio-economic inequalities in tuberculosis (TB) prevalence surveys. DESIGN: Data were drawn from the TB prevalence survey conducted in Lusaka Province, Zambia, in 2005-2006. We compared TB socio-economic inequalities measured through an asset-based index (Index 0) using principal component analysis (PCA) with those observed using three alternative indices: Index 1 and Index 2 accounted respectively for the biases resulting from the inclusion of urban assets and food-related variables in Index 0. Index 3 was built using regression-based analysis instead of PCA to account for the effect of using a different assets weighting strategy. RESULTS: Household socio-economic position (SEP) was significantly associated with prevalent TB, regardless of the index used; however, the magnitude of inequalities did vary across indices. A strong association was found for Index 2, suggesting that the exclusion of food-related variables did not reduce the extent of association between SEP and prevalent TB. The weakest association was found for Index 1, indicating that the exclusion of urban assets did not lead to higher extent of TB inequalities. CONCLUSION: TB socio-economic inequalities seem to be robust to the choice of SEP indicator. The epidemiological meaning of the different extent of TB inequalities is unclear. Further studies are needed to confirm our conclusions.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the robustness of socio-economic inequalities in tuberculosis (TB) prevalence surveys. DESIGN: Data were drawn from the TB prevalence survey conducted in Lusaka Province, Zambia, in 2005-2006. We compared TB socio-economic inequalities measured through an asset-based index (Index 0) using principal component analysis (PCA) with those observed using three alternative indices: Index 1 and Index 2 accounted respectively for the biases resulting from the inclusion of urban assets and food-related variables in Index 0. Index 3 was built using regression-based analysis instead of PCA to account for the effect of using a different assets weighting strategy. RESULTS: Household socio-economic position (SEP) was significantly associated with prevalent TB, regardless of the index used; however, the magnitude of inequalities did vary across indices. A strong association was found for Index 2, suggesting that the exclusion of food-related variables did not reduce the extent of association between SEP and prevalent TB. The weakest association was found for Index 1, indicating that the exclusion of urban assets did not lead to higher extent of TB inequalities. CONCLUSION: TB socio-economic inequalities seem to be robust to the choice of SEP indicator. The epidemiological meaning of the different extent of TB inequalities is unclear. Further studies are needed to confirm our conclusions.
Authors: R F O'Toole; S Jackson; A Hanway; J O'Donnell; C M Comiskey; T R Rogers; D O'Flanagan Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Anne Lia Cremers; René Gerrets; Nathan Kapata; Austin Kabika; Emma Birnie; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Martin P Grobusch Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Tom A Yates; Helen Ayles; Finbarr P Leacy; A Schaap; Delia Boccia; Nulda Beyers; Peter Godfrey-Faussett; Sian Floyd Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Lucy S Tusting; John C Rek; Emmanuel Arinaitwe; Sarah G Staedke; Moses R Kamya; Christian Bottomley; Deborah Johnston; Jo Lines; Grant Dorsey; Steve W Lindsay Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 2.345