Nan Tracy Zheng1, Dana B Mukamel, Thomas V Caprio, Helena Temkin-Greener. 1. *Address correspondence to Nan Tracy Zheng, Aging, Disability and Long-Term Care, RTI International-Waltham office, 1440 Main Street, Suite 310, Waltham, MA 02451-1623, USA. E-mail: ntzheng@rti.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Hospice care provided to nursing home (NH) residents has been shown to improve the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care. However, hospice utilization in NHs is typically low. This study examined the relationship between facility self-reported EOL practices and residents' hospice use and length of stay. DESIGN: The study was based on a retrospective cohort of NH residents. Medicare hospice claims, Minimum Data Set, Online Survey, Certification, and Reporting system and the Area Resource File were linked with a survey of directors of nursing (DON) regarding institutional EOL practice patterns (EOLC Survey). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 4,540 long-term-care residents who died in 2007 in 290 facilities which participated in the EOLC Survey were included in this study. MEASUREMENTS: We measured NHs' tendency to offer hospice to residents and to initiate aggressive treatments (hospital transfers and feeding tubes) for EOL residents based on DON's responses to survey items. Residents' hospice utilization was determined using Medicare hospice claims. RESULTS: The prevalence of hospice use was 18%. The average length of stay was 93 days. After controlling for individual risk factors, facilities' self-reported practice measures associated with residents' likelihood of using hospice were tendency to offer hospice (p = .048) and tendency to hospitalize (p = .002). Residents in NHs reporting higher tendency to hospitalize tended to enroll in hospice closer to death. CONCLUSION: Residents' hospice utilization is not only associated with individual and facility characteristics but also with NHs' self-reported EOL care practices. Potential interventions to effect greater use of hospice may need to focus on facility-level care processes and practices.
OBJECTIVES: Hospice care provided to nursing home (NH) residents has been shown to improve the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care. However, hospice utilization in NHs is typically low. This study examined the relationship between facility self-reported EOL practices and residents' hospice use and length of stay. DESIGN: The study was based on a retrospective cohort of NH residents. Medicare hospice claims, Minimum Data Set, Online Survey, Certification, and Reporting system and the Area Resource File were linked with a survey of directors of nursing (DON) regarding institutional EOL practice patterns (EOLC Survey). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In total, 4,540 long-term-care residents who died in 2007 in 290 facilities which participated in the EOLC Survey were included in this study. MEASUREMENTS: We measured NHs' tendency to offer hospice to residents and to initiate aggressive treatments (hospital transfers and feeding tubes) for EOL residents based on DON's responses to survey items. Residents' hospice utilization was determined using Medicare hospice claims. RESULTS: The prevalence of hospice use was 18%. The average length of stay was 93 days. After controlling for individual risk factors, facilities' self-reported practice measures associated with residents' likelihood of using hospice were tendency to offer hospice (p = .048) and tendency to hospitalize (p = .002). Residents in NHs reporting higher tendency to hospitalize tended to enroll in hospice closer to death. CONCLUSION: Residents' hospice utilization is not only associated with individual and facility characteristics but also with NHs' self-reported EOL care practices. Potential interventions to effect greater use of hospice may need to focus on facility-level care processes and practices.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hospice length of stay; Hospice referral; Hospice utilization; Nursing home end-of-life care practices; Quality of end-of-life care
Authors: Dana B Mukamel; Thomas Caprio; Richard Ahn; Nan Tracy Zheng; Sally Norton; Timothy Quill; Helena Temkin-Greener Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Haiden A Huskamp; David G Stevenson; David C Grabowski; Eric Brennan; Nancy L Keating Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Timothy R Holden; Maureen A Smith; Christie M Bartels; Toby C Campbell; Menggang Yu; Amy J H Kind Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Susan C Miller; Julie C Lima; Orna Intrator; Edward Martin; Janet Bull; Laura C Hanson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Laura A Petrillo; Siqi Gan; Bocheng Jing; Sean Lang-Brown; W John Boscardin; Sei J Lee Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Debra Parker Oliver; Karla Washington; Robin L Kruse; David L Albright; Alexandria Lewis; George Demiris Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Roberta I Jordan; Matthew J Allsop; Yousuf ElMokhallalati; Catriona E Jackson; Helen L Edwards; Emma J Chapman; Luc Deliens; Michael I Bennett Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 3.612