Literature DB >> 23231697

An empirical assessment of driver motivation and emotional states in perceived safety margins under varied driving conditions.

Yu Zhang1, David B Kaber.   

Abstract

Motivation models in driving behaviour postulate that driver motives and emotional states dictate risk tolerance under various traffic conditions. The present study used time and driver performance-based payment systems to manipulate motivation and risk-taking behaviour. Ten participants drove to a predefined location in a simulated driving environment. Traffic patterns (density and velocity) were manipulated to cause driver behaviour adjustments due to the need to conform with the social norms of the roadway. The driving environment complexity was investigated as a mediating factor in risk tolerance. Results revealed the performance-based payment system to closely relate to risk-taking behaviour as compared with the time-based payment system. Drivers conformed with social norms associated with specific traffic patterns. Higher roadway complexity led to a more conservative safety margins and speeds. This research contributes to the further development of motivational models of driver behaviour. PRACTITIONER
SUMMARY: This study provides empirical justification for two motivation factors in driver risk-taking decisions, including compliance with social norm and emotions triggered by incentives. Environment complexity was identified as a mediating factor in motivational behaviour model. This study also recommended safety margin measures sensitive to changes in driver risk tolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231697     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2012.739208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Drivers who self-estimate lower blood alcohol concentrations are riskier drivers after drinking.

Authors:  Jennifer R Laude; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Laboratory analysis of risky driving at 0.05% and 0.08% blood alcohol concentration.

Authors:  Nicholas A Van Dyke; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Simulated driving performance under alcohol: Effects on driver-risk versus driver-skill.

Authors:  Jennifer R Laude; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.

Authors:  Sina Nordhoff; Jork Stapel; Xiaolin He; Alexandre Gentner; Riender Happee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.