Literature DB >> 23231358

Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.

Owoicho Adogwa1, Ryan Owens, Isaac Karikari, Vijay Agarwal, Oren N Gottfried, Carlos A Bagley, Robert E Isaacs, Joseph S Cheng.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Despite advances in technology and understanding in spinal physiology, reoperation for symptomatic adjacent-segment disease (ASD), same-level recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis in elderly patients continues to occur. While revision lumbar surgery is effective, attention has turned to questions on the utility and value of the revision decompression and fusion procedure. To date, an analysis of the cost and health state gain associated with revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, ASD, or same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis has yet to be performed. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of revision surgery in elderly patients with recurrent or persistent back and leg pain.
METHODS: After reviewing their institutional database, the authors found 69 patients 65 years of age and older who had undergone revision decompression and instrumented fusion for back and leg pain associated with pseudarthrosis (17 patients), same-level recurrent stenosis (24 patients), or ASD (28 patients) and included them in this study. Total 2-year back-related medical resource utilization and health state values (quality-adjusted life years [QALYs], calculated from the EQ-5D, the EuroQol-5D health survey, with US valuation) were assessed. Two-year resource use was multiplied by unit costs based on Medicare national allowable payment amounts. The mean total 2-year cost per QALY gained after revision surgery was assessed.
RESULTS: The mean (± standard deviation) time between the index surgery and revision surgery was 3.51 ± 3.63 years. A mean cumulative 2-year gain of 0.35 QALY was observed after revision surgery. The mean total 2-year cost of revision surgery was $28,256 ± $3000 (ASD: $28,829 ± $3812, pseudarthrosis: $28,069 ± $2508, same-level recurrent stenosis: $27,871 ± $2375). Revision decompression and extension of fusion was associated with a mean 2-year cost of $80,594 per QALY gained.
CONCLUSIONS: Revision decompression and fusion provided a significant gain in health state utility for elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, same-level recurrent stenosis, or ASD, with a mean 2-year cost of $80,594 per QALY gained. When indicated, revision surgery for symptomatic ASD, same-level recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis is a valuable treatment option for elderly patients experiencing persistent back and leg pain. Findings in this study provided a value measure of surgery that can be compared with future cost-per-QALY-gained studies of medical management or alternative surgical approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23231358     DOI: 10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  6 in total

1.  Burden of disease of reoperations in instrumental spinal surgeries in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Jacob; Elena Annoni; Jennifer Scarlet Haas; Sebastian Braun; Michael Winking; Jörg Franke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the octogenarian population: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) data.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Alan S Hilibrand; Wenyan Zhao; Jon D Lurie; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert; James Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Cement discoplasty for managing lumbar spine pseudarthrosis in elderly patients: a less invasive alternative approach for failed posterior lumbar spine interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mahmoud Alkharsawi; Mootaz Shousha; Heinrich Boehm; Mohamed Alhashash
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Minimally invasive procedure reduces adjacent segment degeneration and disease: New benefit-based global meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Chuan Li; Chun-Ming Huang; Cheng-Fan Zhong; Rong-Wei Liang; Shao-Jian Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Analysis of single-position for revision surgery using lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation: feasibility and perioperative results.

Authors:  Chason Ziino; Alexander Arzeno; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

6.  The incidence and healthcare costs of persistent postoperative pain following lumbar spine surgery in the UK: a cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).

Authors:  Sharada Weir; Mihail Samnaliev; Tzu-Chun Kuo; Caitriona Ni Choitir; Travis S Tierney; David Cumming; Julie Bruce; Andrea Manca; Rod S Taylor; Sam Eldabe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.