Literature DB >> 23230974

Correlation of age and HRT use with breast density as assessed by Quantra™.

Philippa Skippage1, Louise Wilkinson, Steven Allen, Nicola Roche, Mitch Dowsett, Roger A'hern.   

Abstract

Breast density is a significant predictor in the risk of developing breast cancer. Several methods are available for assessing breast density, but most are subject to intra-observer variability and are unable to assess the breast as a three-dimensional structure. Using Quantra(™) to quantify breast density, we have correlated this with risk factors to determine what impact these variables have on breast density. Women attending for full field digital mammography at the South West London Breast Screening Unit between December 2008 and March 2009 were invited to participate in the study by questionnaire. Consenting women returned the questionnaire allowing further data collection including demographics, menopausal status and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use. Data were correlated against breast density measurements to determine the degree of association. Mammograms were assessed on a Hologic(™) workstation and breast density calculated using Quantra(™). Quantra(™) is an automated algorithm for volumetric assessment of breast tissue composition from digital mammograms. Six-hundred and eighty-three women were invited to participate. Those with implants or mastectomy were excluded. Three-hundred and twenty questionnaires were fully completed and able to be assessed. The mean age of participants was 59 years (range 49-81). Mean density was 19.7% (range 8.5-48.5%). There was a decrease in density with age (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient -0.17). Correlation between density and HRT use showed a significant positive result (correlation coefficient 0.07). Quantra(™) has shown to be an accurate, reproducible tool for quantifying breast density, demonstrated by its correlation with lifestyle and demographic data. Given its ease of acquisition this may be the future of breast density quantification in the digital age.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23230974     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  13 in total

1.  A Longitudinal Study of the Association between Mammographic Density and Gene Expression in Normal Breast Tissue.

Authors:  Helga Bergholtz; Tonje Gulbrandsen Lien; Giske Ursin; Marit Muri Holmen; Åslaug Helland; Therese Sørlie; Vilde Drageset Haakensen
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis--a systematic review.

Authors:  E U Ekpo; M F McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Elisa Regini; Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Gianluca Ghione; Andrea Luparia; Pier Paolo Campanino; Caterina Chiara Bianchi; Laura Bergamasco; Paolo Fonio; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Full-field digital mammography image data storage reduction using a crop tool.

Authors:  Bong Joo Kang; Sung Hun Kim; Yeong Yi An; Byung Gil Choi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Type 2 diabetes and mammographic breast density among underserved women.

Authors:  Maureen Sanderson; Heather O'Hara; Nia Foderingham; William D Dupont; Xiao-Ou Shu; Neeraja Peterson; Alecia M Fair; Anthony C Disher
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Proton density water fraction as a reproducible MR-based measurement of breast density.

Authors:  Leah C Henze Bancroft; Roberta M Strigel; Erin B Macdonald; Colin Longhurst; Jacob Johnson; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Thomas A Sellers; John J Heine
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Mammography with a fully automated breast volumetric software as a novel method for estimating the preoperative breast volume prior to mastectomy.

Authors:  Jin Sung Kim; Kyoungkyg Bae; Eun Ji Lee; Minseo Bang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.

Authors:  Daniëlle van der Waal; Gerard J den Heeten; Ruud M Pijnappel; Klaas H Schuur; Johanna M H Timmers; André L M Verbeek; Mireille J M Broeders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Combined effects of endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density on postmenopausal breast cancer risk: results from the Breakthrough Generations Study.

Authors:  M J Schoemaker; E J Folkerd; M E Jones; M Rae; S Allen; A Ashworth; M Dowsett; A J Swerdlow
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.