Literature DB >> 23229259

Validation of ATP bioluminescence as a tool to assess antimicrobial effects of mouthrinses in an in vitro subgingival-biofilm model.

María-Carmen Sánchez1, Arancha Llama-Palacios, María-José Marín, Elena Figuero, Rubén León, Vanessa Blanc, David Herrera, Mariano Sanz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate whether the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence method is an appropriate tool to assess the efficacy of antiseptic mouthrinses in terms of quantitative reductions of total viable microbial counts in mixed biofilm populations in vitro. STUDY
DESIGN: Three mouthrinses, containing respectively, chlorhexidine and cetylpyridinium chloride (CHX/CPC), essential oils (EO) and amine fluoride/stannous fluoride (AFSF), as well as Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) used as control, were tested in an in vitro static biofilm model by ATP bioluminescence and compared to culture method. Biofilms were grown on saliva-coated hydroxyapatite disks for 72 hours and then exposed for 1 minute to the mouthrinse or control by immersion. The antibacterial effect of the rinses was tested by analysis of variance. The reliability of the ATP bioluminescence method was assessed by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficients when compared to the viable cell counts obtained by culture.
RESULTS: Using ATP bioluminescence, the antimicrobial activity of the tested mouthrinses was demonstrated when compared to the PBS control. The ATP bioluminescence values were significantly correlated (0.769, p<0.001) to the viable cell counts. CHX/CPC and AFSF showed similar antimicrobial activity, although AFSF had a less homogeneous effect, being both more effective than the EO rinse.
CONCLUSION: ATP bioluminescence viability testing may be considered a useful tool to assess the in vitro efficacy of antibacterial compounds. In the proposed model, CHX/CPC and AFSF containing mouthrinses demonstrated superior antimicrobial activity, as compared to EO rinses, in a multispecies biofilm model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23229259      PMCID: PMC3548652          DOI: 10.4317/medoral.18376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal        ISSN: 1698-4447


  27 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of viability of microorganisms employing fluorescence techniques.

Authors:  P Breeuwer; T Abee
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  Direct visualization of spatial and temporal patterns of antimicrobial action within model oral biofilms.

Authors:  Shoji Takenaka; Harsh M Trivedi; Audrey Corbin; Betsey Pitts; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Oral biofilms: emerging concepts in microbial ecology.

Authors:  S Filoche; L Wong; C H Sissons
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  In-vitro evidence for efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses.

Authors:  Pauline C Pan; Scott Harper; Danette Ricci-Nittel; Renate Lux; Wenyuan Shi
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses.

Authors:  John C Gunsolley
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Structure, viability and bacterial kinetics of an in vitro biofilm model using six bacteria from the subgingival microbiota.

Authors:  M C Sánchez; A Llama-Palacios; V Blanc; R León; D Herrera; M Sanz
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 4.419

7.  Application of adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence for quantification of plaque bacteria and assessment of oral hygiene in children.

Authors:  Shahram Fazilat; Rebecca Sauerwein; Jennifer McLeod; Tyler Finlayson; Emilia Adam; John Engle; Prashant Gagneja; Tom Maier; Curtis A Machida
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.874

Review 8.  Antimicrobial agents used in the control of periodontal biofilms: effective adjuncts to mechanical plaque control?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmier Teles; Flavia Rocha Fonseca Teles
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2009

9.  Effect of chlorhexidine/thymol and fluoride varnishes on dental biofilm formation in vitro.

Authors:  Yasuo Takeuchi; Bernhard Guggenheim; Anna Filieri; Pierre Baehni
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.612

10.  Effect of mouthrinses on Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilms in a hydrodynamic model.

Authors:  Isabelle Sliepen; Mark Van Essche; Marc Quirynen; Wim Teughels
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  11 in total

1.  Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Methods for Biofilm Growth: A Mini-review.

Authors:  Christina Wilson; Rachel Lukowicz; Stefan Merchant; Helena Valquier-Flynn; Jeniffer Caballero; Jasmin Sandoval; Macduff Okuom; Christopher Huber; Tessa Durham Brooks; Erin Wilson; Barbara Clement; Christopher D Wentworth; Andrea E Holmes
Journal:  Res Rev J Eng Technol       Date:  2017-10-24

2.  Effects of azithromycin, metronidazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole plus amoxicillin on an in vitro polymicrobial subgingival biofilm model.

Authors:  Geisla M S Soares; Flavia Teles; Jacqueline R Starr; Magda Feres; Michele Patel; Lynn Martin; Ricardo Teles
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Streptococcus oralis Employs Multiple Mechanisms of Salivary Mucin Binding That Differ Between Strains.

Authors:  Gurdeep Chahal; Macarena P Quintana-Hayashi; Meztlli O Gaytán; John Benktander; Medea Padra; Samantha J King; Sara K Linden
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.073

4.  Removal and killing of multispecies endodontic biofilms by N-acetylcysteine.

Authors:  Young-Suk Choi; Cheul Kim; Ji-Hoi Moon; Jin-Yong Lee
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 5.  Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Ranita Roy; Monalisa Tiwari; Gianfranco Donelli; Vishvanath Tiwari
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.882

6.  Comparison between Two Assessment Tests for Oral Hygiene: Adenosine Triphosphate + Adenosine Monophosphate Swab Test and Bacteria Number Counting by Dielectrophoretic Impedance Measurement.

Authors:  Yuki Iwawaki; Yuki Muraoka; Hiroaki Higashiyama; Takahiro Kishimoto; Lipei Liu; Takaharu Goto; Tetsuo Ichikawa
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-01

Review 7.  Helicobacter pylori Biofilm-Related Drug Resistance and New Developments in Its Anti-Biofilm Agents.

Authors:  Chong Hou; Fangxu Yin; Song Wang; Ailing Zhao; Yingzi Li; Yipin Liu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Optimization of a real-time high-throughput assay for assessment of Streptococcus mutans metabolism and screening of antibacterial dental adhesives.

Authors:  Fernando Luis Esteban Florez; Rochelle Denise Hiers; Yan Zhao; Justin Merritt; Adam Justin Rondinone; Sharukh Soli Khajotia
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 9.  Evolution of Antibacterial Drug Screening Methods: Current Prospects for Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Clara M Bento; Maria Salomé Gomes; Tânia Silva
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 10.  Classic vs. Novel Antibacterial Approaches for Eradicating Dental Biofilm as Adjunct to Periodontal Debridement: An Evidence-Based Overview.

Authors:  Ali Abdulkareem; Hayder Abdulbaqi; Sarhang Gul; Mike Milward; Nibras Chasib; Raghad Alhashimi
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.