Literature DB >> 23228925

Safety, long-term results, and predictors of recurrence after complete endocardial ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation in patients with previous myocardial infarction.

Ángel Arenal1, Jesús Hernández, David Calvo, Cecilia Ceballos, Leonardo Atéa, Tomás Datino, Felipe Atienza, Esteban González-Torrecilla, Gabriél Eídelman, Ángel Miracle, Pablo Avila, Javier Bermejo, Francisco Fernández-Avilés.   

Abstract

Conduction channels and electrograms with isolated component/late potentials are sensitive markers of the substrate of post-myocardial infarction sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Ablation of all conduction channels and isolated component/late potentials (complete endocardial VT substrate ablation [CEVTSA]) during sinus rhythm could simplify and facilitate the ablation procedure, mainly in patients without references for clinical VT substrate identification. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy, and predictors of VT recurrence after CEVTSA. Electroanatomic mapping and CEVTSA were performed in 59 post-myocardial infarction patients (mean age 67 ± 9 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 30 ± 11%), 24 of whom did not have clinical VT substrate references. The mean areas of scar (≤1.5 mV) and dense scar (≤0.5 mV) were 76 ± 42 and 34 ± 24 cm(2), respectively; isolated component/late potentials and conduction channels were identified and ablated in 97% and 83% of patients (mean ablation area 14 ± 10 cm(2)). No life-threatening complications occurred during the procedure. After 1 year and at the end of follow-up (mean 39 ± 21 months), 81% and 58% of patients were free of VT. No differences were observed between patients with and without specific clinical VT substrate identification. Univariate analysis identified the left ventricular ejection fraction, VT cycle length (VTCL), infarct location (inferior vs anterior), and dense scar area as predictors of VT recurrence, and Cox analysis identified VTCL (hazard ratio 0.42, p <0.001) and dense scar area (hazard ratio 2.65, p <0.0006) as independent predictors. No patients with dense scar area ≤25 cm(2) and VTCL >350 ms had recurrences. In conclusion, CEVTSA is safe and effective, even in patients without clinical VT substrate identification. Scar area and VTCL are valuable predictors of VT recurrence.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23228925     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Complications and emergency situations].

Authors:  Kristina Wasmer; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: Lessons learned from past clinical trials and implications for future clinical trials.

Authors:  Sean D Pokorney; Daniel J Friedman; Hugh Calkins; David J Callans; Emile G Daoud; Paolo Della-Bella; Kevin P Jackson; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Samir Saba; John Sapp; William G Stevenson; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 3.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Ventricular Arrhythmia Therapies in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Kivanc Yalin; Ebru Golcuk; Tolga Aksu
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-06-30

4.  Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation - The Right Approach for the Right Patient.

Authors:  Mouhannad M Sadek; Robert D Schaller; Gregory E Supple; David S Frankel; Michael P Riley; Mathew D Hutchinson; Fermin C Garcia; David Lin; Sanjay Dixit; Erica S Zado; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-11-29

5.  The prognostic value of J-wave pattern for recurrence of ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Naruse; Marta de Riva; Masaya Watanabe; Adrianus P Wijnmaalen; Jeroen Venlet; Marnix Timmer; Martin J Schalij; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Epicardial access and ventricular tachycardia ablation in a postmyocarditis patient using a nonfluoroscopic catheter visualization system.

Authors:  Akiko Ueda; Mika Nagaoka; Kyoko Soejima; Yosuke Miwa; Noriko Matsushita
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-29

Review 7.  Substrate Mapping and Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients with Structural Heart Disease: How to Identify Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate.

Authors:  Takeshi Kitamura; Claire A Martin; Konstantinos Vlachos; Ruairidh Martin; Antonio Frontera; Masateru Takigawa; Nathaniel Thompson; Ghassen Cheniti; Gregoire Massouille; Anna Lam; Felix Bourier; Josselin Duchateau; Thomas Pambrun; Arnaud Denis; Nicolas Derval; Meleze Hocini; Michel HaÏssaguerre; Hubert Cochet; Pierre JaÏs; Frédéric Sacher
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2019-03-15

Review 8.  Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Functional Substrate Mapping: Practices and Outcomes.

Authors:  Sara Vázquez-Calvo; Ivo Roca-Luque; Andreu Porta-Sánchez
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-30

9.  Pre-procedural image-guided versus non-image-guided ventricular tachycardia ablation-a review.

Authors:  A A Hendriks; Z Kis; M Glisic; W M Bramer; T Szili-Torok
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Clinical, procedural and long-term outcome of ischemic VT ablation in patients with previous anterior versus inferior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristina Wasmer; Holger Reinecke; Marius Heitmann; Dirk G Dechering; Florian Reinke; Philipp S Lange; Gerrit Frommeyer; Simon Kochhäuser; Patrick Leitz; Lars Eckardt; Julia Köbe
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.460

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.