Literature DB >> 23228499

Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up.

Ulla Pallesen1, Jan W V van Dijken, Jette Halken, Anna-Lena Hallonsten, Ruth Höigaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate in a prospective follow up the longevity of posterior resin composites (RC) placed in permanent teeth of children and adolescents attending Public Dental Health Service.
METHODS: All posterior RC placed, in the PDHS clinics in the cities of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg in Denmark between November 1998 and December 2002, in permanent teeth of children and adolescents up to 18 years, were evaluated in an up to 8 years follow up. The endpoint of each restoration was defined, when repair or replacement was performed. Survival analyses were performed between subgroups with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The individual contribution of different cofactors to predict the outcome was performed with Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: Totally 2881 children with a mean age of 13.7 years (5-18) received 4355 RC restorations placed by 115 dentists. Eighty percent were placed in molars and 49% were Class I. Two percent of restorations with base material and 1% of the restorations without base material showed postoperative sensitivity (n.s.). Replacements were made in 406 and repairs in 125 restorations. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative survival at 8 years of 84.3%, resulting in an annual failure rate of 2%. Lower patient age, more than one restoration per patient, placement of a base material and placement of RC: in molars, in cavities with high number of surfaces, in lower jaw teeth, showed all significant higher failure rates. Five variables had significant importance for the end point, replacement/repair of the resin composite restorations: age of patient, age of operator, jaw, tooth type and cavity size. SIGNIFICANCE: Posterior RC restorations placed in children and adolescents in Public Dental Health clinics showed an acceptable durability with annual failure rates comparable with those of randomized controlled RC studies in adults.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23228499     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  28 in total

1.  Five-year evaluation of a low-shrinkage Silorane resin composite material: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Malene Schmidt; Irene Dige; Lise-Lotte Kirkevang; Michael Vaeth; Preben Hørsted-Bindslev
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Luciano Casagrande; Alejandra Tejeda Seminario; Marcos Britto Correa; Stefanie Bressan Werle; Marisa Maltz; Flávio Fernando Demarco; Fernando Borba de Araujo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Caries risk and number of restored surfaces have impact on the survival of posterior composite restorations.

Authors:  Ben Balevi
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2014-12

4.  Clinical cross-polarization optical coherence tomography assessment of subsurface enamel below dental resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Patricia Lenton; Joel Rudney; Alex Fok; Robert S Jones
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-05-07

5.  The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 2: Amalgam restorations - time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth.

Authors:  F J T Burke; P S K Lucarotti
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Teaching posterior resin composites in UK and Ireland dental schools: do current teaching programmes match the expectation of clinical practice arrangements?

Authors:  C D Lynch; I R Blum; R J McConnell; K B Frazier; P A Brunton; N H F Wilson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  No more amalgams: Use of amalgam and amalgam alternative materials in primary dental care.

Authors:  C D Lynch; D J J Farnell; H Stanton; I G Chestnutt; P A Brunton; N H F Wilson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Effect of Bioactive Primers on Bacterial-Induced Secondary Caries at the Tooth-Resin Interface.

Authors:  G E Kim; A A Leme-Kraus; R Phansalkar; G Viana; C Wu; S-N Chen; G F Pauli; Akb Bedran-Russo
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.440

9.  Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph L Riley; D Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey L Fellows; Deborah A Dilbone; Solomon G Brotman; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.634

10.  Restoration outcomes after restoring vital teeth with advanced caries lesions: a practice-based retrospective study.

Authors:  Falk Schwendicke; Hannes Krüger; Peter Schlattmann; Sebastian Paris
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.