Literature DB >> 23228282

Importance of patient-specific intraoperative guides in complex maxillofacial reconstruction.

Dennis Rohner1, Raquel Guijarro-Martínez, Peter Bucher, Beat Hammer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional maxillofacial reconstruction often leads to suboptimal results due to inaccurate planning or surgical difficulties in adjusting a free flap and osteosynthesis plates into a three-dimensional defect.
OBJECTIVES: To justify the importance of patient-specific intraoperative guides in complex maxillofacial reconstruction. CLINICAL EXAMPLE: A 40-year old patient underwent a left hemimaxillectomy for an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the palate. Six years later, massive recurrence required radical resection of the left orbit and reconstruction with cranial bone grafts and a free latissimus dorsi flap. Postoperative radiotherapy resulted in local osteoradionecrosis. Surgical revision and restoration of the maxillary defect with a prefabricated fibula flap was performed. The authors provide ample information on the application of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) and rapid prototyping at each reconstructive step. DISCUSSION: Stereolithographic models enable simulation of the resective and reconstructive phases, prebending of reconstruction plates and fabrication of surgical guides.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal restitution of complex maxillofacial defects requires meticulous planning of the surgical and prosthetic phases and effective transfer of the plan to the operating room through patient specific guides. CAD-CAM technology and stereolithographic models represent an effective strategy to achieve this. Improved patient outcomes and intraoperative efficiency certainly offset the inherent increase in costs.
Copyright © 2012 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23228282     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  19 in total

1.  The Application of Virtual Planning and Navigation Devices for Mandible Reconstruction and Immediate Dental Implantation.

Authors:  Chingiz R Rahimov; Ismayil M Farzaliyev; Hamid Reza Fathi; Mahammad M Davudov; Anar Aliyev; Emin Hasanov
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-11-19

2.  Evaluation of three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of renal tumors: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Hong-wei Ge; Ning-chen Li; Cheng-fan Yu; Hong-feng Guo; Shi-hua Jin; Jin-shun Liu; Yan-qun Na
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  3D printing in urology: Is it really promising?

Authors:  Berat Cem Özgür; Ali Ayyıldız
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-01-08

Review 4.  Oral and dental late effects in survivors of childhood cancer: a Children's Oncology Group report.

Authors:  Karen E Effinger; Cesar A Migliorati; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin P McMullen; Sue C Kaste; Kathy Ruble; Gregory M T Guilcher; Ami J Shah; Sharon M Castellino
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Aesthetic reconstruction of onco-surgical maxillary defects using free scapular flap with and without CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide.

Authors:  Mohamed Salah Alwadeai; Leena Ali Al-Aroomy; Mostafa Ibrahim Shindy; Ayman Abdel-Wahab Amin; Mohamed Hamdallah Zedan
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.030

6.  Usefulness of personalized three-dimensional printed model on the satisfaction of preoperative education for patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and their families.

Authors:  Jun Teishima; Yukihiro Takayama; Shogo Iwaguro; Tetsutaro Hayashi; Shogo Inoue; Keisuke Hieda; Shunsuke Shinmei; Ryoji Kato; Koji Mita; Akio Matsubara
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Integration of Perforator Vessels in CAD/CAM Free Fibula Graft Planning: A Clinical Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Goetze; Peer W Kämmerer; Bilal Al-Nawas; Maximilian Moergel
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-04-08

Review 8.  3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Jayanthi Parthasarathy
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01

9.  Statistical Analysis of Interactive Surgical Planning Using Shape Descriptors in Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibular Segments.

Authors:  Megumi Nakao; Shimpei Aso; Yuichiro Imai; Nobuhiro Ueda; Toshihide Hatanaka; Mao Shiba; Tadaaki Kirita; Tetsuya Matsuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  3D printing in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a nationwide survey among university and non-university hospitals and private practices in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Pabst; Elisabeth Goetze; Daniel G E Thiem; Alexander K Bartella; Lukas Seifert; Fabian M Beiglboeck; Juliane Kröplin; Jürgen Hoffmann; Alexander-N Zeller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.