BACKGROUND: Day care attendance is a major risk factor for respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses in preschool children. In this study, we describe the results of a hygiene intervention cohort trial at day care centres (DCCs) on the rates of febrile, respiratory, and gastrointestinal illnesses in preschool children. METHODS: Thirty DCCs in 2 communities were included. The number of illness episodes was registered for each child every 6 months, as well as potential risk factors. The hygiene intervention was introduced in half of the DCCs and the results analysed using a multivariate mixed effects hierarchical Poisson regression model. RESULTS: The study lasted 2.5 y, of which the hygiene intervention lasted 1.5 y. Two thousand three hundred and forty-nine children participated, delivering 2832 person-y. Adjusted incidence rate ratios of the illnesses at the intervention and non-intervention DCCs were not significantly different for any of the illnesses. The intervention was not more effective in children less than 3 y of age than in older children and no significant effects were seen with time. Compliance with the hygiene protocol was good as measured by the use of hygiene products and by a survey among the staff at the DCCs. CONCLUSIONS: The most likely explanation for the lack of effects of the intervention is that the baseline standard of hygiene at the DCCs was probably too high for the intervention to demonstrate significant results, but recall bias cannot be excluded. Even though hygiene is important for minimizing the spread of microbes at DCCs, other risk factors need to be studied.
BACKGROUND: Day care attendance is a major risk factor for respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses in preschool children. In this study, we describe the results of a hygiene intervention cohort trial at day care centres (DCCs) on the rates of febrile, respiratory, and gastrointestinal illnesses in preschool children. METHODS: Thirty DCCs in 2 communities were included. The number of illness episodes was registered for each child every 6 months, as well as potential risk factors. The hygiene intervention was introduced in half of the DCCs and the results analysed using a multivariate mixed effects hierarchical Poisson regression model. RESULTS: The study lasted 2.5 y, of which the hygiene intervention lasted 1.5 y. Two thousand three hundred and forty-nine children participated, delivering 2832 person-y. Adjusted incidence rate ratios of the illnesses at the intervention and non-intervention DCCs were not significantly different for any of the illnesses. The intervention was not more effective in children less than 3 y of age than in older children and no significant effects were seen with time. Compliance with the hygiene protocol was good as measured by the use of hygiene products and by a survey among the staff at the DCCs. CONCLUSIONS: The most likely explanation for the lack of effects of the intervention is that the baseline standard of hygiene at the DCCs was probably too high for the intervention to demonstrate significant results, but recall bias cannot be excluded. Even though hygiene is important for minimizing the spread of microbes at DCCs, other risk factors need to be studied.
Authors: T P Zomer; V Erasmus; C W Looman; A Tjon-A-Tsien; E F Van Beeck; J M De Graaf; A H E Van Beeck; J H Richardus; H A C M Voeten Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Emily T Martin; Jane Kuypers; Helen Y Chu; Sydney Foote; Andrew Hashikawa; Mary P Fairchok; Janet A Englund Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Tizza P Zomer; Vicki Erasmus; Nico Vlaar; Ed F van Beeck; Aimée Tjon-A-Tsien; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Hélène A C M Voeten Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: T P Zomer; V Erasmus; C W Looman; E F VAN Beeck; A Tjon-A-Tsien; J H Richardus; H A C M Voeten Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 2.451