Literature DB >> 23226709

Two new species of Tornidae (Caenogastropoda, Rissooidea) from Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Luiz Ricardo L Simone1.   

Abstract

Two new species of shallow water Tornidae are found in Espírito Santo state, Brazil, formally described herein. They belong to a complex group of tiny gastropods, in such the taxonomy is very confused. Cyclostremiscus mohicanussp. n. is characterized by three well-developed spiral, equidistant carinas, working as base of three series of tall, aligned periostracal rods. Episcinia itanhunasp. n. has as single sculpture a series of pustules in periphery, but the periostracum bears three series of peripheral fringes with irregular rods. The new species are compared with the allies, showing a close relation with Caribbean fauna, but possessing worthy differences. These similarities have raised misidentifications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brazil; Caenogastropoda; Espírito Santo; Tornidae; biodiversity; coastal waters

Year:  2012        PMID: 23226709      PMCID: PMC3496946          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.238.3884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The Tornidae Sacco, 1896 has also been called Vitrinellidae Bush, 1897. They normally are tiny (~2 mm), discoid gastropods living in coastal shallow waters, usually associated with other organisms, such as algae, worm galleries, etc. Possibly because of the minute size, the tornids are normally absent in faunal inventories. In collections, the few samples are normally poorly identified, and the draft identification, at least in Brazilian samples, is normally south expansions of North Atlantic or Caribbean species, resulting exceedingly wide distributed species. The PageBreaksame has reflected in the pertinent literature. This wide distribution contrasts with the minute size and the paucispiral protoconch, both normally indicating short or no planktonic phase, and low dispersion. On the other hand, this supposedly wide distribution does not resist to a close look, in such interesting and important differences appear confronting distant collected samples. This paper is just another example. It deals with two species so far identified as species described from Florida and North Carolina, which has been extended to Caribbean. However, some significant details have demonstrated that the Brazilian samples actually belong to different, undescribed species. The western Atlantic tornid fauna had an important improvement with a recent revision (Rubio et al. 2011), allowing a better analysis of samples. The genus Pilsbry & Olsson, 1945 (type species, OD, C.B. Adams, 1852, from Caribbean) has a worldwide, tropical distribution. It is mainly characterized by usually carina-bearing shell, normally with secondary sculpture in intervals of carinas, and a wide, opened umbilicus (Pilsbry and Olsson 1945: 266; Rubio et al. 2011: 83). The genus Mörch, 1875 (type species, M, d’Orbigny, 1842, from Caribbean), is restricted to Pacific and Atlantic coasts of Americas. It is mainly characterized by serrate peripheral keel, deep umbilicus, and spiral fringes with periostracal filaments (Rubio et al. 2011: 125). This paper deals with the formal descriptions of two species belonging to these genera, recently collected in sediment sorting by local researchers, as well as confrontation with type specimens.

Material and methods

The studied samples are only empty shells in all kinds of preservation levels, since specimens with periostracum to eroded shells. They are photographed in multi-focus dissecting microscope and in SEM (Laboratório de Microscopia Eletrônica do Museu de Zoologia da USP). Abbreviations of institutions are: MNRJ: Museu Nacional da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; MZSP, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo; USNM, National Museum of Natual History, Smithsonian Institution.

Systematics

Genus Pilsbry & Olsson, 1945

sp. n.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:FF9F3D9C-8BF9-4CAB-A236-8C143BA62A6F http://species-id.net/wiki/Cyclostremiscus_mohicanus Figs 1–15
Figures 1–15.

sp. n. types 1 holotype MZSP 106551 (W 2.8 mm), apical view 2 same, umbilical view 3 same, apertural view 4 same, apertural-slightly apical view 5, same, apertural-slightly umbilical view 6 paratype MZSP 106552 #1, apical view (W 1.8 mm) 7 same, umbilical view 8 #2, apical view (W 1.7 mm) 9 #1, apertural-slightly apical view 10 same, apertural view 11 #3, SEM, apertural-slightly apical view (W 1.7 mm) 12 same, apertural view 13 same, apertural-slightly umbilical view 14 #4, SEM, apical view (W 1.5 mm) 15 same, detail of apical region, scale 0.1 mm.

Types.

Holotype MZSP 106551 (Figs 1–5). Paratypes: 106552, 16 shells from type locality.PageBreak

Type locality.

BRAZIL. Espírito Santo; São Mateus, Guriri, 18°47'S, 32°39'W, 3 m depth.

Diagnosis.

Shell of about 2.5 mm; almost planispiral. Three carina-like spiral threads somewhat equidistant; superior surface smooth or with scanty spiral cords. Periphery smooth except threads. Peri-umbilical area with string spiral cords. Periostracum with aligned series of tall rods on spiral threads.

Description.

Shell. Up to ~2.5 mm, discoid; height ~52% of maximum width (Figs 3, 10, 12). Color pure white, weakly translucent (Figs 1, 2, 5, 6). Protoconch of 2 whorls, weakly-turbiform (Figs 4, 10, 11, 15); whorls of rounded profile, suture shallow; surface glossy, smooth; occupying ~10% of shell size; located almost central, weakly dislocated towards right. Transition protoconch-teleoconch unclear (Fig. 15). Spire weakly elevated, with ~45% of shell width; ~15% of shell height. Teleoconch up to 2.5 whorls, uniformly growing weakly planispiral, bearing three somewhat equidistant carinas (Figs 9, 10, 11, 12); peripheral carina as tallest, profile blunt, ~100°, located in middle level of last whorl, inflating ~15% shell width; inferior carina similar to peripheral carina, located midway between this and peri-umbilical slope (Figs 10, 12, 13); superior carina with ~half size as peripheral carina, located midway between this and adjacent suture (Figs 6, 8, 9, 11); between carinas somewhat planar surface, being weakly elevated in carina’s base. Sculpture superior to peripheral carina absent (Figs 11, 14) to series of narrow, low, obsolete spiral cords (Figs 6, 8), varying from zero (surface smooth, Fig. 14) to ~10 (Fig. 8); interspaces between spiral cords ~1/4 their width; sculpture inferior to peripheral carina absent (smooth). Umbilicum widely opened; maximum diameter ~30% shell width; flanking by strong, somewhat planar slope; sculptured from 1 to 5 spiral cords, with interspaces ~3 times their width (Figs 5, 7, 12, 13). Aperture weakly prosocline (Figs 4, 9, 11, 13); rounded, weakly pentangular, i.e., bearing somewhat equidistant blunt angles produced by three carinas and umbilical slope (Figs 10, 12); with ~35% shell width, ~70% of shell height. Callus practically absent, weakly covering adjacent whorl in apertural implantation. Periostracum (Figs 1–5). Opaque, transparent, color pale beige. Series of tall rods aligned on three carinas; rods of peripheral carina augmenting ~10% shell width (Figs 1, 2), about twice taller than wide, tip rounded, slightly broader than base; rods of superior carina similar to those of peripheral carina, with ~80% of their size (Figs 3, 4); rods of inferior carina also similar to those of peripheral carina, with ~30% their height and ~60% their width (Figs 3, 5). Each rod blade-like, flexible, located close to each other from same carina, forming tall flexible ridge on each carina. Periostracum ridge on three carinas suddenly finishing at apertural level. On aperture, region between ridge of superior carina and insertion of outer lip in adjacent preceding whorl a small region with ridge of peripheral ridge reabsorbed, forming anal notch with ~1/5 of aperture size (Figs 1, 2, 5). Measurements (in mm). Holotype: 2.8 by 0.9; paratype 106552 (Fig. 10): 1.7 by 0.8. sp. n. types 1 holotype MZSP 106551 (W 2.8 mm), apical view 2 same, umbilical view 3 same, apertural view 4 same, apertural-slightly apical view 5, same, apertural-slightly umbilical view 6 paratype MZSP 106552 #1, apical view (W 1.8 mm) 7 same, umbilical view 8 #2, apical view (W 1.7 mm) 9 #1, apertural-slightly apical view 10 same, apertural view 11 #3, SEM, apertural-slightly apical view (W 1.7 mm) 12 same, apertural view 13 same, apertural-slightly umbilical view 14 #4, SEM, apical view (W 1.5 mm) 15 same, detail of apical region, scale 0.1 mm.

Distribution.

Only known from type locality.

Habitat

. Sandy bottoms, 3 m depth (no living specimens).

Material examined.

Types.

Discussion.

is similar to (Fischer, 1857) (Rosenberg et al. 2009; Rubio et al. 2011) from Florida and Caribbean. It differs by the smoother superior surface, lacking so developed spiral cords, the contrary happens in the umbilicum, in such that of has a series of spiral cords, while PageBreak has only growth lines; the size is also different, as has about 3 mm, while reaches 9-10 mm. also resembles (Gabb, 1873), also from Caribbean, it differs by the more developed spiral sculpture in the superior shell surface, by the peri-umbilical spiral sculpture, in being slightly taller (height/width tax= ~52% against ~48% of ), and in having the peripheral carina slightly more elevated. has been referred as occurring in south Brazil (Rios 2009: 59, in Porto Belo, Santa Catarina; Rubio et al. 2011: 91); as that material was not found, this record is here considered doubtful, but possibly they are of . Another important difference between and is the protoconch, it has ~2 whorls (Fig. 15), while that of is ~0.5 whorl longer (Rubio et al. 2011, fig. 46F). is also somewhat similar to (Bursh, 1885), sharing the size and the carinas shape; however, it differs from that species in lacking the microtubercles on the protoconch, in having spiral sculpture in surface between suture and superior carina, and in being taller (height/width tax= ~52% against ~42% of ). The periostracum bearing expansions are relatively common in living and fresh-died specimens of tornids. However, a periostracum with the arrangement appears to be novelty. Nothing like that has been found in other congeneric species. clearly belongs to the “group 1” as defined by Rubio et al. (2011: 84), which encompasses carinate species of the genus, with 2 or 3 peripheral carinas. Possibly all carinas of those species are base of periostracal expansions like those of .

Genus Mörch, 1875

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:154F48BF-4FB0-44B1-B83A-62C1650CB74E http://species-id.net/wiki/Episcynia_itanhura Figs 16–27
Figures 16–27.

sp. n. types 16 holotype MZSP 106553, umbilical view (W 2.0 mm) 17 same, apical view 18 same, apertural view 19 paratype MZSP 106556#1, umbilical view (W 2.2 mm) 20 same, apertural view 21 #2, SEM, umbilical-slightly apertural view (W 2.5 mm) 22 #3, SEM, umbilical view (W 2.1 mm) 23 #4, SEM, apertural-slightly umbilical view (W 2.5 mm) 24 #5, SEM, apertural view (W 2.6 mm) 25 #4, SEM, apertural view 26 #6, SEM, apical view (W 1.0 mm) 27 #6, detail of protoconch (scale 50µm).

Episcinia inornata : Episcinia inornata form Holotype MZSP 106553 (Figs 16-18). Paratypes: 106556, 18 shells, MNRJ, 3 shells, USNM, 3 shells, all from type locality. BRAZIL. Espírito Santo; São Mateus, Guriri, 18°47'S, 32°39'W, 3 m depth. Shell relatively trochoid. Periostracum with 3 series of peripheral fringes constituted of irregular rods. Surface smooth except for peripheral line of pustules. Peripheral carina wanting (profile rounded). Shell. Up to ~2.5 mm, discoid (Figs 18, 24) to trochiform (Figs 20, 25); height ~57-68% of maximum width (Figs 18, 20, 24, 25). Color white, PageBreakweakly translucent (Figs 16–20). Protoconch of 1 whorl, ~90 µm, weakly-turbiform (Figs 26, 27); whorl of rounded profile, suture shallow; surface glossy, smooth; occupying ~7% of shell size; located almost central, weakly dislocated towards right (Fig. 17). Transition protoconch-teleoconch clear, orthocline (Figs 26, 27). Spire dome-shaped to elevated, with ~66% of shell width; ~60–64% of shell height. TePageBreakleoconch up to 4 whorls, uniformly growing inferiorly; last whorl with rounded profile, lacking peripheral carina. Sculpture practically absent, except for growth lines looking undulations and aligned set of small pustules located just superiorly to suture and in middle level of past whorl periphery; each pustule rounded, separated from neighboring pustules by space equivalent to half its width; 2 to 4 equidistant, very weak spiral cords present in ~50% of specimens located in superior region of each whorl (Figs 20, 25); inferior region of body whorl only with growth lines (Figs 19, 22). Umbilicum widely opened; maximum diameter ~30% shell width; flanking by strong, somewhat planar slope, beating only growth lines; weak angulation marking periphery of umbilicum (Figs 19, 23, 24, 25). Aperture slightly prosocline (Figs 21, 22, 23); elliptical (longer axis vertical) (Figs 24, 25); with ~36% shell width, ~40–43% of shell height. Callus practically absent, weakly covering adjacent whorl in apertural implantation (Figs 21, 23). Periostracum (Figs 16–18). Opaque, transparent, color yellowish beige (Figs 16–18). Three series of rods running on periphery (Fig. 18); central fringe running on pustule lines; other 2 fringes running above and below central fringe, distance between fringes equivalent to ~1/3 of whorl height; periostracum rods located on fringes not uniformly distributed and sized; longer rods extending ~10% shell width, weakly coiled, distantly separated from neighbor rods. Measurements (in mm). Holotype (Fig. 18): 2.0 by 1.1; paratypes MZSP 106556 (Fig. 20)#1: 2.2 by 1.3; (Fig. 24)#5: 2.6 by 1.5; (Fig. 25)#4: 2.5 by 1.6. sp. n. types 16 holotype MZSP 106553, umbilical view (W 2.0 mm) 17 same, apical view 18 same, apertural view 19 paratype MZSP 106556#1, umbilical view (W 2.2 mm) 20 same, apertural view 21 #2, SEM, umbilical-slightly apertural view (W 2.5 mm) 22 #3, SEM, umbilical view (W 2.1 mm) 23 #4, SEM, apertural-slightly umbilical view (W 2.5 mm) 24 #5, SEM, apertural view (W 2.6 mm) 25 #4, SEM, apertural view 26 #6, SEM, apical view (W 1.0 mm) 27 #6, detail of protoconch (scale 50µm). Brazil, from Bahia to São Paulo.

Habitat.

Sandy bottoms, ~3 m depth (no living specimens collected). Types. Additional material: MZSP 106571, 90 shells from type locality. BRAZIL. Bahia; Salvador, Itapoã beach, MZSP 53439, 1 shell (C.M. Cunha col.). Rio de Janeiro; Cabo Frio, MZSP 57159, 2 shells (17/ii/1970). São Paulo; off Ubatuba, MZSP 88431, 1 shell (Veliger II, sta. PI-15; 21/i/1986); 23°33'978"S, 45°09'821"W, 12.3 m depth, MZSP 42087, 1 shell (Biota sta. 145i; 16/iv/2002). N.B. These samples are not part of the type material because of low quality of the shell preservation.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is derived from the Paritintin word Itanhura’mbi – chain used as necklace (Betts 1981), an allusion to the peripheral ornamentation of the shell. is similar to (d’Orbigny, 1842), from Florida and Caribbean, differing in lacking so developed peripheral carina, the profile of each whorl is rounded while that of is bluntly pointed (Rubio et al. 2011, Figs 68B, 69); has a more developed axial undulation, almost sculpture (e.g., Figs 20, 25), this is rare in , in such the surface is smoother and glossy. The size of the protoconch of has been referred as 190 µm (Rubio et al. 2011), while that of is about half that size (~90 µm, Figs 26, 27). The periostracum rods are organized in 3 fringes in (Fig. 18), while a single pair is found in (Andrews 1971: 68; Abbott 1974: 86). The 3 fringes are also found in (Dall 1889), from North Carolina PageBreakto north Caribbean, differs in having periostracum rods more sparsely and less uniformly developed, by the deeper suture, and by the straighter profile of spire. The differences between Caribbean and Brazilian specimens have been pointed in literature (Rubio et al. 2011, fig. 68D), however, the differences obviously did not influenced the specific separation. Nevertheless, some doubt still remains in relation to the specimen figures in that paper (Rubio et al. 2011), because that illustrated specimen has whorls with almost squared profile, possibly it belong to another undescribed specimen. No specimen with such features has been examined herein. Additionally, there is some uncertainties respect to the possible synonymy between and (Dall 1889), described from North Carolina. Dall (1889: 392-393) clearly stated a specimen with four to five carinas per whorl. This feature is not found in or allied species; this can demonstrate a valid entity. Moreover, Dall still described a more richness of sculpture, a lack of periostracal fringe in peripheral carina, and color yellow, whose can be extra indicative of specific differentiation. Despite further studies are necessary to clarify the question, cannot be confused with .

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.