| Literature DB >> 23226411 |
Xu Han1, Zhihui Cheng, Huanwen Meng.
Abstract
The garlic stalk is a byproduct ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23226411 PMCID: PMC3511307 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Basic characteristics of original soil and garlic stalk.
| Samples | pHvalue | EC value(µs • cm−1) | Totalnitrogen(g • kg−1) | Total organiccarbon(g • kg−1) | C/N | Organicmatter(g • kg−1) | Totalphosphorus(g • kg−1) | Totalpotassium(g • kg−1) | Cellulosecontent(%) |
| Original soil | 7.75 | 267.0 | 0.99 | 10.55 | 10.61 | 18.19 | 0.89 | 7.96 | 0 |
| Garlic stalk | 7.44 | 653.0 | 0.24 | 353.51 | 146.87 | 609.46 | 16.46 | 0.27 | 0.68 |
Figure 1Effects of the duration of garlic stalk decomposition on soil pH (A) and EC (B).
Error bars represent as the standard error of the mean. Different letters above the error bars indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test), n = 3.
Effects of different garlic stalk decomposition durations on dynamic changes in soil nutrients.
| Decomposingduration(days) | Totalnitrogen(g • kg−1) | Totalorganic carbon(g • kg−1) | C/N | Organicmatter(g • kg−1) | Total phosphorus(g • kg−1) | Totalpotassium(g • kg−1) |
| 0 | 0.99 e | 10.55 bc | 10.61 abc | 18.19 bc | 0.89 a | 7.96 b |
| 10 | 1.15 b | 14.06 a | 12.24 ab | 24.23 a | 0.90 a | 13.74 a |
| 20 | 1.12 bc | 15.20 a | 13.50 a | 26.20 a | 0.88 ab | 13.98 a |
| 30 | 1.01 e | 12.33 ab | 12.16 ab | 21.25 ab | 0.77 bc | 13.93 a |
| 40 | 1.10 c | 10.33 bc | 9.38 bc | 17.80 bc | 0.76 bc | 14.15 a |
| 50 | 1.06 d | 8.43 c | 7.93 c | 14.53 c | 0.70 c | 14.03 a |
| 60 | 1.21 a | 10.61 bc | 8.76 c | 18.30 bc | 0.85 ab | 13.97 a |
The data are presented as soil nutrient dynamics. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test), n = 3.
Figure 2Effects of duration of garlic stalk decomposition on soil enzyme activity.
Effects of different durations of garlic stalk decomposition on soil sucrase activity (A), soil urease activity (B) and soil alkaline phosphatase activity (C). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Different letters above the error bars indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test), n = 3.
Figure 3Effects of different garlic stalk decomposition temperatures on soil pH (A) and EC (B).
Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Different letters above the histograms indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test), n = 3.
Effects of different garlic stalk decomposition temperatures on dynamic changes in soil nutrients.
| Decomposing temperature(°C) | Totalnitrogen(g • kg−1) | Totalorganic carbon(g • kg−1) | C/N | Organicmatter(g • kg−1) | Total phosphorus(g • kg−1) | Totalpotassium(g • kg−1) |
| 10 | 0.86 c | 8.85 b | 10.59 a | 15.26 b | 0.58 a | 13.35 a |
| 25 | 0.90 b | 10.00 a | 11.17 a | 17.24 a | 0.59 a | 13.93 a |
| 40 | 0.97 a | 10.11 a | 10.42 a | 17.43 a | 0.44 a | 9.49 b |
The data are presented as soil nutrient dynamics. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test), n = 3.
Figure 4Effects of different garlic stalk decomposition temperatures on soil enzyme activities.
Effect of different decomposition temperature of garlic stalk on soil sucrase activity (A), soil urease activity (B) and soil alkaline phosphatase activity (C). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Different letters above the histograms indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test), n = 3.
Figure 5Effects of different concentrations of decomposed garlic stalk on soil pH (A) and EC (B).
Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Different letters above the error bars indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test), n = 3.
Effects of different concentrations of decomposed garlic stalk on dynamic changes in soil nutrients.
| Ratio of garlic stalk to soil | Totalnitrogen(g • kg−1) | Totalorganic carbon(g • kg−1) | C/N | Organicmatter(g • kg−1) | Total phosphorus(g • kg−1) | Totalpotassium(g • kg−1) |
| 0 ∶ 100 | 0.99 b | 10.55 b | 10.61 a | 18.19 b | 0.89 a | 7.96 b |
| 1 ∶ 100 | 0.94 c | 10.45 b | 11.10 a | 18.02 b | 0.82 ab | 13.18 a |
| 3 ∶ 100 | 1.01 b | 12.37 b | 12.20 a | 21.32 b | 0.77 b | 13.93 a |
| 5 ∶ 100 | 1.21 a | 15.09 a | 12.44 a | 26.01 a | 0.66 c | 13.11 a |
The data are presented as the soil nutrient dynamics. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test), n = 3.
Figure 6Effects of different concentrations of decomposed garlic stalk on soil enzyme activities.
Effects of different concentrations of decomposed garlic stalk on soil sucrase activity (A), soil urease activity (B) and soil alkaline phosphatase activity (C). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Different letters above the error bars indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test), n = 3.