| Literature DB >> 23226155 |
Geneva M Stein1, Coleen T Murphy.
Abstract
Our understanding of the molecular and genetic regulation of aging and longevity has been greatly augmented through studies using the small model system, C. elegans. It is important to test whether mutations that result in a longer life span also extend the health span of the organism, rather than simply prolonging an aged state. C. elegans can learn and remember both associated and non-associated stimuli, and many of these learning and memory paradigms are subject to regulation by longevity pathways. One of the more distressing results of aging is cognitive decline, and while no gross physical defects in C. elegans sensory neurons have been identified, the organism does lose the ability to perform both simple and complex learned behaviors with age. Here we review what is known about the effects of longevity pathways and the decline of these complex learned behaviors with age, and we highlight outstanding questions in the field.Entities:
Keywords: C. elegans; aging; behavior; insulin signaling; learning; longevity; memory; neurons
Year: 2012 PMID: 23226155 PMCID: PMC3509946 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Figure 1Age-related changes in neuron morphology and behavior. Behaviors based on sensory perception (A) decline rapidly with age, preceding accumulation of most identified neuronal defects (B), long before worms start to die [solid black line in (A,B)]. Complex sensory behaviors, such as long-term associative memory, decline prior to mechanosensory behaviors, such as locomotion. References: (1) Kauffman et al., 2010, (2) Hsu et al., 2009, (3) Beck and Rankin, 1993, (4) Murakami and Murakami, 2005, (5) Glenn et al., 2004, (6) Luo et al., 2009, (7) Tank et al., 2011, (8) Toth et al., 2012, (9) Pan et al., 2011.
Longevity pathway mutant phenotypes compared to wild-type worms.
| Phenotype with respect to wild-type | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuron integrity (Pan et al., | n/d | + | n/d | − | No change | + |
| Positive associative thermotaxis (Murakami and Murakami, | No change | + | + | − | + | + |
| Negative associative thermotaxis (Murakami and Murakami, | − | + | + | − | No change | No change |
| Salt learning (Tomioka et al., | − | − | − | − | Naïve defect | n/d |
| Olfactory adaptation (Chalasani et al., | − | + | n/d | n/d | n/d | n/d |
| Massed positive olfactory learning (Kauffman et al., | No change | No change | n/d | − | No change | n/d |
| Short-term associative memory (Kauffman et al., | n/d | + | n/d | − | No change | n/d |
| Spaced olfactory learning (Kauffman et al., | n/d | No change | n/d | − | No change | n/d |
| Long-term associative memory (Kauffman et al., | n/d | + | n/d | − | − | n/d |
| Olfactory avoidance learning (Lin et al., | − | − | − | n/d | n/d | n/d |
Mutants listed have been tested in at least two learning and memory paradigms reviewed here, or for neuron aging phenotypes and one learning and memory paradigm reviewed here.
(+), Aqua: increased compared to wild-type. (−), Yellow: defective compared to wild-type. (no change) The same as wild-type. (n/d) Not determined. (naïve defect) Chemotaxis defect before training.