| Literature DB >> 23226086 |
Phuong Dang Thai Phan1, Hiroki Kageyama, Ryo Ishikawa, Takashige Ishii.
Abstract
The Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon, has partial outcrossing behavior and shows high levels of genetic variation. To estimate an accurate outcrossing rate of annual form of O. rufipogon, two backcross lines (Lines R1 and R2) between Oryza sativa Nipponbare and O. rufipogon W630 were examined under field conditions. A chromosome survey confirmed that these lines had wild chromosomal segments at more than 92% of marker loci. As for the traits of glume, stamen and pistil, Line R1 showed similar floral morphology as that of O. rufipogon W630, whereas Line R2 had larger glumes. In 2005, 2006 and 2008, a total of 22 backcross plants were planted in the middle of wild rice plots. The successive progenies of each plant were examined using microsatellite markers that could clearly detect self-pollination and outcrossing. The outcrossing rates of Line R1 plants ranged from 4.04% to 25.50% with an average of 10.20%. This indicates that cross-pollination of wild rice is a chance event affected by many environmental factors. The outcrossing rates of Line R2 plants also varied, however, no significant difference was observed between the averages of Lines R1 and R2, suggesting that the glume sizes are not critical for outcrossing ability.Entities:
Keywords: Oryza rufipogon; backcross line; field condition; microsatellite marker; outcrossing rate; rice
Year: 2012 PMID: 23226086 PMCID: PMC3501943 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.62.256
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Fig. 1Field experimental design for the estimation of the outcrossing rate of wild rice. (A) Schematic layout of the plot. White and black circles represent the positions of the plants of O. rufipogon and the backcross line, respectively. (B) Overview of the plot one month after transplanting. (C) Flowering peak in the plot (two and half months after transplanting).
Marker genotypes of two backcrossed lines, Line R1 and Line R2, at 89 microsatellite loci
| Chr. | Locus | Genotype | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Line R1 | Line R2 | ||
| 1 | RM84 | 3 | 3 |
| RM220 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM1 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM243 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM23 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM35 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM9 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM5 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM237 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM246 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM212 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM265 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM315 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM14 | 3 | 3 | |
| 2 | RM211 | 3 | 3 |
| RM53 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM8 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM29 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM263 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM221 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM6 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM240 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM250 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM208 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM213 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM207 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM48 | 3 | 3 | |
| 3 | RM60 | 3 | 3 |
| RM22 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM231 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM7 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM232 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM251 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM16 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM49 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM55 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM227 | 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | RM261 | 3 | 3 |
| RM252 | 2 | 2 | |
| RM241 | 2 | 2 | |
| RM131 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM349 | 3 | 3 | |
| 5 | RM13 | 3 | 3 |
| RM164 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM26 | 3 | 3 | |
| 6 | RM204 | 3 | 3 |
| RM225 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM253 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM50 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM3 | 1 | 3 | |
| RM30 | 3 | 3 | |
| 7 | RM82 | 2 | 3 |
| RM214 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM2 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM11 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM10 | 2 | 3 | |
| RM234 | 1 | 3 | |
| RM18 | 1 | 3 | |
| RM248 | 3 | 3 | |
| 8 | RM25 | 3 | 3 |
| RM42 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM223 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM210 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM256 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM230 | 3 | 3 | |
| 9 | RM219 | 3 | 3 |
| RM242 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM201 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM215 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM245 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM205 | 3 | 3 | |
| 10 | RM222 | 3 | 3 |
| RM216 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM258 | 3 | 3 | |
| 11 | RM4B | 2 | 3 |
| RM20B | 2 | 3 | |
| RM167 | 2 | 3 | |
| RM202 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM209 | 3 | 1 | |
| RM229 | 3 | 1 | |
| RM21 | 3 | 1 | |
| RM206 | 3 | 1 | |
| RM224 | 3 | 3 | |
| 12 | RM20A | 3 | 3 |
| RM4A | 3 | 3 | |
| RM19 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM247 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM260 | 3 | 3 | |
| RM17 | 3 | 3 | |
Microsatellite markers were listed according to the map positions by Chen and Temnykh .
1: Homozygote of O. sativa Nipponbare alleles. 2: Heterozygote. 3: Homozygote of wild alleles.
Fig. 2Floral morphology of O. rufipogon W630 and two backcross lines (Line R1 and Line R2). Glumes before flowering (A) and after flowering (B). Npb: O. sativa Nipponbare, W630: O. rufipogon W630.
Floral traits measured for O. rufipogon W630, O. sativa Nipponbare and two backcross lines. Value indicates mean ± s.d. The mean values of two lines are compared with that of O. rufipogon W630 by t-test
| Accession | Lemma length (mm) | Palea length (mm) | Lemma thickness (mm) | Palea thickness (mm) | Lemma width (mm) | Palea width (mm) | Awn length (cm) | Anther length (mm) | Stigma length (mm) | Stigma breadth (mm) | Style length (mm) | Stigma exertion (%) | Opening angle (degree) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.23 ± 0.01 | 7.30 ± 0.02 | 1.06 ± 0.01 | 0.90 ± 0.04 | 2.06 ± 0.01 | 1.21 ± 0.01 | 8.92 ± 0.09 | 2.14 ± 0.01 | 1.17 ± 0.05 | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 100 ± 0.0 | 29.9 ± 1.2 | |
| Line R1 | 7.20 ± 0.04 | 7.32 ± 0.04 | 1.06 ± 0.01 | 0.91 ± 0.02 | 2.05 ± 0.03 | 1.21 ± 0.02 | 9.16 ± 0.43 | 2.14 ± 0.01 | 1.16 ± 0.03 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.02 | 100 ± 0.0 | 30.7 ± 1.1 |
| Line R2 | 7.32 ± 0.04 | 7.41 ± 0.06 | 1.13 ± 0.04 | 1.00 ± 0.05 | 2.13 ± 0.03 | 1.32 ± 0.06 | 9.15 ± 0.26 | 2.14 ± 0.02 | 1.16 ± 0.02 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 100 ± 0.0 | 29.6 ± 0.6 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| 6.57 ± 0.07 | 6.79 ± 0.10 | 1.25 ± 0.02 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 2.45 ± 0.02 | 1.60 ± 0.02 | n.a. | 1.94 ± 0.03 | 0.94 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.02 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 23.9 ± 1.1 | |
Significant at 1% level.
Fig. 3An example of the determination of outcross events among the progenies of the backcross line. (A) Backcross Line R1 has homozygous Nipponbare alleles at the RM3 microsatellite locus on chromosome 6 in the genetic background of O. rufipogon. Two different genotypes at RM3 were generated among the successive progenies by self-pollination and outcrossing. (B) Marker genotypes of the progenies (nos. 1–14) are clearly distinguished by electrophoretic band patterns. Nos. 2, 7 and 8: Outcrossed progenies showing heterozygous band patterns at RM3.
Outcrossing rates of two backcross lines based on the number of the outcrossed progenies against total number of progenies in 2005, 2006 and 2008
| (A) Results in 2005 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Plant no. | Number of progenies examined | Outcrossing rate (%) | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Collection date | Total | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| 30-Aug | 2-Sep | 6-Sep | 9-Sep | ||||||
| Line R1 | |||||||||
| 05-R1-1 | 44 (9) | 31 (11) | 35 (8) | 4 (1) | 114 (29) | 25.44 | |||
| 05-R1-2 | 56 (7) | 40 (9) | 51 (19) | 6 (4) | 153 (39) | 25.50 | |||
| 05-R1-3 | 36 (10) | 58 (6) | 45 (3) | 9 (0) | 148 (19) | 12.84 | |||
| Line R2 | |||||||||
| 05-R2-1 | 19 (1) | 32 (5) | 27 (0) | 0 (0) | 78 (6) | 7.69 | |||
| 05-R2-2 | 23 (1) | 34 (0) | 21 (2) | 0 (0) | 78 (3) | 3.85 | |||
| 05-R2-3 | 50 (5) | 46 (4) | 44 (4) | 12 (3) | 152 (16) | 10.53 | |||
|
| |||||||||
| (B) Results in 2006 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Plant no. | Number of progenies examined | Outcrossing rate (%) | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Collection date | Total | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| 1-Sep | 5-Sep | 9-Sep | 12-Sep | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Line R1 | |||||||||
| 06-R1-1 | 17 (2) | 23 (1) | 17 (2) | 9 (0) | 66 (5) | 7.58 | |||
| 06-R1-2 | 23 (1) | 40 (2) | 8 (0) | 3 (0) | 74 (3) | 4.05 | |||
| 06-R1-3 | 29 (5) | 18 (0) | 6 (0) | 5 (0) | 58 (5) | 8.62 | |||
| 06-R1-4 | 29 (1) | 17 (3) | 4 (0) | 6 (0) | 56 (4) | 7.14 | |||
| Line R2 | |||||||||
| 06-R2-1 | 25 (0) | 95 (7) | 129 (5) | 33 (1) | 282 (13) | 4.61 | |||
| 06-R2-2 | 72 (0) | 141 (1) | 128 (3) | 28 (2) | 369 (6) | 1.63 | |||
| 06-R2-3 | 53 (0) | 118 (1) | 62 (3) | 20 (1) | 253 (5) | 1.98 | |||
| 06-R2-4 | 48 (7) | 140 (4) | 77 (2) | 40 (0) | 305 (13) | 4.26 | |||
|
| |||||||||
| (C) Results in 2008 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Plant no. | Number of progenies examined | Outcrossing rate (%) | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Collection date | Total | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| 1-Sep | 3-Sep | 5-Sep | 7-Sep | 9-Sep | 11-Sep | 13-Sep | |||
|
| |||||||||
| Line R1 | |||||||||
| 08-R1-1 | 53 (0) | 23 (0) | 26 (1) | 46 (2) | 46 (5) | 30 (1) | 37 (4) | 261 (13) | 4.98 |
| 08-R1-2 | 55 (4) | 46 (3) | 39 (0) | 52 (2) | 47 (2) | 39 (1) | 19 (0) | 297 (12) | 4.04 |
| 08-R1-3 | 49 (9) | 47 (2) | 46 (1) | 38 (1) | 26 (1) | 39 (0) | 17 (2) | 262 (16) | 6.11 |
| 08-R1-4 | 68 (2) | 18 (3) | 42 (1) | 37 (1) | 33 (4) | 23 (2) | 18 (1) | 239 (14) | 5.86 |
| Line R2 | |||||||||
| 08-R2-1 | 43 (9) | 34 (1) | 90 (2) | 68 (1) | 37 (0) | 35 (1) | 33 (2) | 340 (16) | 4.71 |
| 08-R2-2 | 27 (1) | 48 (2) | 55 (5) | 64 (10) | 40 (8) | 48 (2) | 33 (5) | 315 (33) | 10.48 |
| 08-R2-3 | 50 (3) | 84 (2) | 81 (2) | 27 (1) | 38 (1) | 47 (0) | 29 (2) | 356 (11) | 3.09 |
| 08-R2-4 | 10 (0) | 25 (1) | 33 (1) | 34 (2) | 21 (3) | 27 (5) | 9 (1) | 159 (13) | 8.18 |
Number of the outcrossed progenies is given in parenthesis.